Literature DB >> 35146617

Methods and Applications of 3D Patient-Specific Virtual Reconstructions in Surgery.

Jordan Fletcher1.   

Abstract

3D modelling has been highlighted as one of the key digital technologies likely to impact surgical practice in the next decade. 3D virtual models are reconstructed using traditional 2D imaging data through either direct volume or indirect surface rendering. One of the principal benefits of 3D visualisation in surgery relates to improved anatomical understanding-particularly in cases involving highly variable complex structures or where precision is required.Workflows begin with imaging segmentation which is a key step in 3D reconstruction and is defined as the process of identifying and delineating structures of interest. Fully automated segmentation will be essential if 3D visualisation is to be feasibly incorporated into routine clinical workflows; however, most algorithmic solutions remain incomplete. 3D models must undergo a range of processing steps prior to visualisation, which typically include smoothing, decimation and colourization. Models used for illustrative purposes may undergo more advanced processing such as UV unwrapping, retopology and PBR texture mapping.Clinical applications are wide ranging and vary significantly between specialities. Beyond pure anatomical visualisation, 3D modelling offers new methods of interacting with imaging data; enabling patient-specific simulations/rehearsal, Computer-Aided Design (CAD) of custom implants/cutting guides and serves as the substrate for augmented reality (AR) enhanced navigation.3D may enable faster, safer surgery with reduced errors and complications, ultimately resulting in improved patient outcomes. However, the relative effectiveness of 3D visualisation remains poorly understood. Future research is needed to not only define the ideal application, specific user and optimal interface/platform for interacting with models but also identify means by which we can systematically evaluate the efficacy of 3D modelling in surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-modelling; Segmentation; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35146617     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87779-8_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  35 in total

1.  Midfacial reconstruction using virtual planning, rapid prototype modeling, and stereotactic navigation.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Rhonda F Jacob; Luc Bidaut; Geoffrey L Robb; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Systematic review of augmented reality in urological interventions: the evidences of an impact on surgical outcomes are yet to come.

Authors:  Riccardo Bertolo; Andrew Hung; Francesco Porpiglia; Pierluigi Bove; Mary Schleicher; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Three-Dimensional Printing and Its Applications in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Trevor D Crafts; Susan E Ellsperman; Todd J Wannemuehler; Travis D Bellicchi; Taha Z Shipchandler; Avinash V Mantravadi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Multiple application of three-dimensional soft kidney models with localized kidney cancer: A pilot study.

Authors:  Peter Vitalevich Glybochko; Leonid Mikhailovich Rapoport; Yuri Gennadevich Alyaev; Eugene Sergeevich Sirota; Eugene Alexeevich Bezrukov; Dmitry Nikolaevich Fiev; Ildar Shamilevich Byadretdinov; Mikhail Dmitrievich Bukatov; Alexander Vasilevich Letunovskiy; Dmitry Olegovich Korolev
Journal:  Urologia       Date:  2018-03-27

5.  Clinical effects of 3-D printing-assisted personalized reconstructive surgery for blowout orbital fractures.

Authors:  Bin Fan; Han Chen; Ying-Jian Sun; Bei-Fen Wang; Lin Che; Shu-Yan Liu; Guang-Yu Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Stereotactic neurosurgery and computerized tomographic scanning.

Authors:  P L Gildenberg
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1983

7.  Efficacy of 3D Printed Models on Resident Learning and Understanding of Common Acetabular Fracturers.

Authors:  Omer A Awan; Maunil Sheth; Ian Sullivan; Jafar Hussain; Padmaja Jonnalagadda; Stephen Ling; Sayed Ali
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Applications of Computer Technology in Complex Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Kyle S Gabrick; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Augmenting Microsoft's HoloLens with vuforia tracking for neuronavigation.

Authors:  Taylor Frantz; Bart Jansen; Johnny Duerinck; Jef Vandemeulebroucke
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Impact of Preoperative Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Cholangiography on Postoperative Resection Margin Status in Patients Operated due to Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Andert; P Bruners; C Heidenhain; F Ulmer; C D Klink; P H Alizai; C Kuhl; U P Neumann; M Binnebösel
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.