Literature DB >> 25869986

Mirror-Imaged Rapid Prototype Skull Model and Pre-Molded Synthetic Scaffold to Achieve Optimal Orbital Cavity Reconstruction.

Sung Woo Park1, Jong Woo Choi2, Kyung S Koh3, Tae Suk Oh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of traumatic orbital wall defects has evolved to restore the original complex anatomy with the rapidly growing use of computer-aided design and prototyping. This study evaluated a mirror-imaged rapid prototype skull model and a pre-molded synthetic scaffold for traumatic orbital wall reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent orbital wall reconstruction after trauma from 2012 to 2014. Patients were included by admission through the emergency department after facial trauma or by a tertiary referral for post-traumatic orbital deformity. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomogram-based mirror-imaged reconstruction images of the orbit and an individually manufactured rapid prototype skull model by a 3D printing technique were obtained for each case. Synthetic scaffolds were anatomically pre-molded using the skull model as guide and inserted at the individual orbital defect. Postoperative complications were assessed and 3D volumetric measurements of the orbital cavity were performed. Paired samples t test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred four patients with immediate orbital defect reconstructions and 23 post-traumatic orbital deformity reconstructions were included in this study. All reconstructions were successful without immediate postoperative complications, although there were 10 cases with mild enophthalmos and 2 cases with persistent diplopia. Reoperations were performed for 2 cases of persistent diplopia and secondary touchup procedures were performed to contour soft tissue in 4 cases. Postoperative volumetric measurement of the orbital cavity showed nonsignificant volume differences between the damaged orbit and the reconstructed orbit (21.35 ± 1.93 vs 20.93 ± 2.07 cm(2); P = .98). This protocol was extended to severe cases in which more than 40% of the orbital frame was lost and combined with extensive soft tissue defects.
CONCLUSION: Traumatic orbital reconstruction can be optimized and successful using an individually manufactured rapid prototype skull model and a pre-molded synthetic scaffold by computer-aid design and manufacturing.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25869986     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  19 in total

Review 1.  Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started.

Authors:  Don Hoang; David Perrault; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review.

Authors:  Suhani Ghai; Yogesh Sharma; Neha Jain; Mrinal Satpathy; Ajay Kumar Pillai
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-25

3.  Clinical effects of 3-D printing-assisted personalized reconstructive surgery for blowout orbital fractures.

Authors:  Bin Fan; Han Chen; Ying-Jian Sun; Bei-Fen Wang; Lin Che; Shu-Yan Liu; Guang-Yu Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Sunah Kang; Jaeyoung Kwon; Chan Joo Ahn; Bita Esmaeli; Guk Bae Kim; Namkug Kim; Ho-Seok Sa
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Shivam Patel; Tom Shokri; Kasra Ziai; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  Correction of a Posttraumatic Orbital Deformity Using Three-Dimensional Modeling, Virtual Surgical Planning with Computer-Assisted Design, and Three-Dimensional Printing of Custom Implants.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Paul M Phillips; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-04-03

7.  Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull.

Authors:  Jason S Naftulin; Eyal Y Kimchi; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Application of Rapid Prototyping Technique and Intraoperative Navigation System for the Repair and Reconstruction of Orbital Wall Fractures.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Cha; Yong Hae Lee; Wan Chul Ruy; Young Roe; Myung Ho Moon; Sung Gyun Jung
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-23

10.  Applications of Computer Technology in Complex Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Kyle S Gabrick; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.