Literature DB >> 28785789

ACL reconstruction using 5- or 6-strand hamstring autograft provides graft's diameter bigger than 8 mm.

Vytautas Tutkus1,2, Karolis Kluonaitis3, Simona Silove4, Janina Tutkuviene4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to measure the diameters of 5- and 6-strand hamstring autografts and to evaluate the predictability of their thickness by other body size indices.
METHODS: Data were collected from 122 skeletally mature adult patients, who had undergone arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using only 5- or 6-strand hamstring autografts. The diameters of tibial and femoral ends of the grafts were measured with the precision of 0.5 mm. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between autograft's thickness and body size indices.
RESULTS: The diameter of the femoral end of the 5-strand graft in male/female patients on average was 8.9/8.3 mm, while the femoral end of the 6-strand graft-9.3/8.5 mm (respectively). In 98.4% of the cases, 5- or 6-strand hamstring autografts were significantly thicker than 8 mm. In 5-strand group, a significant positive correlation was detected between the diameter of autograft's femoral end and patient's height (r = 0.55; p < 0.001), weight (r = 0.60; p < 0.001) and BMI (r = 0.43; p < 0.01). The 6-strand group had statistically significant correlations between the femoral end of the graft and height (r = 0.53; p < 0.001), and femoral end of the graft and weight (r = 0.50; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring autografts were significantly thicker than 8 mm. Taller and heavier persons tended to have greater diameters of hamstring autografts; however, to better predict the diameter of autograft, body composition should be studied in relation to autograft's size. Preparation of 5- or 6-strand graft (using all the length of hamstring tendons) provides almost 100% of probability to obtain graft's diameter bigger than 8 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-strand; 6-strand; ACL reconstruction; Body size; Hamstring graft

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28785789     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4668-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  John P Goldblatt; Sean E Fitzsimmons; Ethan Balk; John C Richmond
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Registry data highlight increased revision rates for endobutton/biosure HA in ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: a nationwide cohort study from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Andreas Persson; Asle B Kjellsen; Knut Fjeldsgaard; Lars Engebretsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Jonas M Fevang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  S Thomas; R Bhattacharya; J B Saltikov; D J Kramer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Role of anthropometric data in the prediction of 4-stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sean Wei Loong Ho; Teong Jin Lester Tan; Keng Thiam Lee
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 5.  Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; James L Carey; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Prediction of semitendinosus-gracilis graft diameter in children and adolescents using anthropometric measures.

Authors:  Rafael Calvo R; Maximiliano Espinosa I; David Figueroa P; Rafael Calvo M
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Kristian Samuelsson; Ninni Sernert; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?

Authors:  D Gallagher; M Visser; D Sepúlveda; R N Pierson; T Harris; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; David C Flanigan; Joshua Mitchell; Angela D Pedroza; Morgan H Jones; Jack T Andrish; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  5 in total

1.  ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

Authors:  Sven Putnis; Thomas Neri; Samuel Grasso; James Linklater; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Five-Strand Hamstring Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John-Rudolph H Smith; Darby A Houck; Jessica A Hart; Armando F Vidal; Rachel M Frank; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-22

3.  Failure Rates of 5-Strand and 6-Strand vs Quadrupled Hamstring Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 413 Patients With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalil Attia; Hazem Nasef; Kareem Hussein ElSweify; Mohammed A Adam; Faris AbuShaaban; Kariyal Arun
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-26

4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictive Model Determines Hamstring Autograft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Under 18 Years Old.

Authors:  Benjamin Sherman; Kevin Kwan; John Schlechter
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-13

5.  Remnant Muscle Preservation on Hamstring Tendon Autograft During ACL Reconstruction Promotes Volumetric Increase With Biological and Regenerative Potential.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Z Funchal; Rafael Ortiz; Andrew Jimenez; Gabriella Di Giunta Funchal; Moises Cohen; Diego Costa Astur
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.