Literature DB >> 28782201

Cross-cultural adaptation, reproducibility and validation of the Italian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

Stefano Vercelli1, Giorgio Ferriero2, Elisabetta Bravini3, Valeria Stissi4, Matteo Ciceri5, Sara Rossetti6, Sara Bianchi7, Francesco Sartorio1.   

Abstract

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is one of the most robust instruments to assess scar quality, but there is no Italian version, and no other competing instruments are available in Italian. The aim of this study was to translate and validate an Italian version of POSAS (POSAS-I). POSASv2.0 was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric assessment included acceptability/feasibility, internal consistency, reproducibility, construct validity and sensitivity to change. Cultural equivalence of POSAS-I with the English version was confirmed. The validation study included 102 subjects with surgical scars. Both subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0·72-0·80). Reproducibility of the OSAS-I (ICCs = 0·93-0·94; SEM = 1·8 points; MDC95 = 5·1 points) was superior to that of PSAS-I (ICC = 0·65; SEM = 5·7 points; MDC95 = 15·7 points). OSAS-I showed moderate to good correlations with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) and PSAS-I. Sensitivity to change was large for PSAS-I (effect size = 1·08; standardised response mean = 0·96) and moderate to large for OSAS-I (ES = 0·69; SRM = 0·92). This study confirmed that POSAS-I can be used to assess patients with surgical scars in the Italian population. OSAS-I is useful for clinical and research purposes, while PSAS-I should be better used to capture patients' own opinions and symptoms in clinical settings.
© 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cicatrix; Evaluation; Reliability; Translation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28782201      PMCID: PMC7950069          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  24 in total

1.  Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.

Authors:  X Liu; P J Nelemans; M Van Winden; N W J Kelleners-Smeets; K Mosterd
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.

Authors:  Stefano Vercelli; Giorgio Ferriero; Francesco Sartorio; Valeria Stissi; Franco Franchignoni
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.

Authors:  Martijn B A van der Wal; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Esther Middelkoop; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Internet-based survey on current practice for evaluation, prevention, and treatment of scars, hypertrophic scars, and keloids.

Authors:  David B Lumenta; Eva Siepmann; Lars-Peter Kamolz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 5.  Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Vercelli; Giorgio Ferriero; Francesco Sartorio; Carlo Cisari; Elisabetta Bravini
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Helen M DeJong; Michael Phillips; Dale W Edgar; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Annekatrien L van de Kar; Leonard U M Corion; Mark J C Smeulders; Lieneke J Draaijers; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Translation of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) to French with cross-cultural adaptation, reliability evaluation and validation.

Authors:  Valérie Deslauriers; Dominique M Rouleau; Ghassan Alami; Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.

Authors:  Martijn B A van der Wal; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Monica C T Bloemen; Pauline D H M Verhaegen; Esther Middelkoop; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.

Authors:  Jin Kyung Chae; Jeong Hee Kim; Eun Jung Kim; Kun Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.444

View more
  6 in total

1.  Selective Enzymatic Debridement For The Management Of Acute Upper Limb Burns.

Authors:  M Cherubino; L Valdatta; T Baroni; I Pellegatta; F Tamborini; L Garutti; P Di Summa; R Adani
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  What Type of Incision for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery Involving Long Segments Can Bring Better Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes?

Authors:  Hyung Rae Lee; Dong-Ho Lee; Sang Yun Seok; Sehan Park; Jae Hwan Cho; Chang Ju Hwang; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Pedram Jawanrudi; Richard Bender; Dietmar Pennig; Berivan Taskin; Sebastian Schäller; Tarek Al-Malat; Lijo Mannil
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Translation and cultural adaptation of an Arabic version of the patient scar assessment scale for thyroidectomy patients.

Authors:  Turki Al-Drees; Ahmad Albosaily; Latifa Alanazi; Sami Alharethy; Ghada AlHindi; Ahmed Altuwaijri; Saleh Aldhahri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Extended rotation flap for reconstruction of partial thickness defects of the tip and nasal ala region: in search of better aesthetic results.

Authors:  Annachiara Cavaliere; Barbara Maisto; Tatiana Zaporojan; Ludovica Giordano; Luigi Sorbino; Antonio Zaffiro; Amalia Vozza; Simone La Padula; Francesco D'Andrea; Fabrizio Schonauer
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 6.  Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare?

Authors:  Amanda Min Hui Choo; Yee Siang Ong; Fadi Issa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.