Helen M DeJong1, Michael Phillips2, Dale W Edgar3, Fiona M Wood4. 1. Perth Scar and Pain Clinic, Mt Pleasant, 6153, WA, Australia; Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan Universtiy, Joondaplup, 6027, WA, Australia; Harry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, Nedlands, 6009, WA, Australia; Fiona Wood Foundation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia. Electronic address: info@PerthSPC.com.au. 2. Harry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, Nedlands, 6009, WA, Australia; Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia; Royal Perth Hospital, Perth 6000, WA, Australia. 3. Fiona Wood Foundation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Node, The Universtiy of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, 6160, WA, Australia; State Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia. Electronic address: Dale.edgar@health.wa.gov.au. 4. Fiona Wood Foundation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Node, The Universtiy of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, 6160, WA, Australia; State Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia; Child and Adolescent Health Service of Western Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital, Subiaco, 6008, WA, Australia. Electronic address: Fiona.wood@health.wa.gov.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Scarring is a significant consequence for patients following a burn. Understanding how patients perceive the physiological scar and define scar severity may provide valuable information regarding how the scar influences quality of life after burn. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was the first scar assessment tool validated to include the patients' evaluation of the scars physical qualities, following a burn. Validation studies of this tool have previously been conducted for a discrete scar-site after burn. The aim of this study was to assess the structural validity of the POSAS to capture the patients' evaluation of the total area of burn scar(s). METHOD: Statistical analysis was based on 508 completed POSAS forms from 358 patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used initially to identify the number of factors within the tool, then confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modelling explored areas of misfit within each factor and whether the model provided a predicable structure to capture patient perception of scar severity. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The CFA analysis confirmed that a two dimensional model was superior to a unidimensional model when assessing the patient opinion of their total burn scar. The two dimensions were the physical scar (color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity) and the sensory scar (pain and itch). Further strain analysis of the two factor model identified additional domains. Independent factors influenced the perception of color forming a separate subdomain within the physical domain. Color is a visual characteristic, whereas the other three are predominantly tactile characteristics. A significant relationship between thickness and irregularity suggested they may form another subdomain, however further research is required to confirm this. Both pain and itch were recognized as independent, multidimensional latent variables, which require assessment tools with multidimensional structures. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing the entire burn scar, three independent dimensions influence patient perception: (1) the physical scar, (2) pain and (3) itch. Within the physical domain, color formed a visual subdomain separate to a tactile subdomain. Further development of these domains within a high-order multi-dimensional structure is recommended. Crown
INTRODUCTION: Scarring is a significant consequence for patients following a burn. Understanding how patients perceive the physiological scar and define scar severity may provide valuable information regarding how the scar influences quality of life after burn. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was the first scar assessment tool validated to include the patients' evaluation of the scars physical qualities, following a burn. Validation studies of this tool have previously been conducted for a discrete scar-site after burn. The aim of this study was to assess the structural validity of the POSAS to capture the patients' evaluation of the total area of burn scar(s). METHOD: Statistical analysis was based on 508 completed POSAS forms from 358 patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used initially to identify the number of factors within the tool, then confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modelling explored areas of misfit within each factor and whether the model provided a predicable structure to capture patient perception of scar severity. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The CFA analysis confirmed that a two dimensional model was superior to a unidimensional model when assessing the patient opinion of their total burn scar. The two dimensions were the physical scar (color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity) and the sensory scar (pain and itch). Further strain analysis of the two factor model identified additional domains. Independent factors influenced the perception of color forming a separate subdomain within the physical domain. Color is a visual characteristic, whereas the other three are predominantly tactile characteristics. A significant relationship between thickness and irregularity suggested they may form another subdomain, however further research is required to confirm this. Both pain and itch were recognized as independent, multidimensional latent variables, which require assessment tools with multidimensional structures. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing the entire burn scar, three independent dimensions influence patient perception: (1) the physical scar, (2) pain and (3) itch. Within the physical domain, color formed a visual subdomain separate to a tactile subdomain. Further development of these domains within a high-order multi-dimensional structure is recommended. Crown
Authors: Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Genoveva Friederike Aretz; Paul Christian Fuchs; Mahsa Bagheri; Martin Funk; Alexandra Schulz; Marc Daniels Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Rowan W Sanderson; Qi Fang; Andrea Curatolo; Aiden Taba; Helen M DeJong; Fiona M Wood; Brendan F Kennedy Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Inge Spronk; Anniek Stortelers; Cornelis H van der Vlies; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Anouk Pijpe Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 3.617