| Literature DB >> 28782053 |
Bryna L Fitzgerald1, Sebabrata Mahapatra1, Delphine K Farmer2, Michael R McNeil1, Robert A Casero3, John T Belisle1.
Abstract
An untargeted metabolomics approach was utilized to determine urinary metabolites that could serve as small-molecule biomarkers for treatment response to standard tuberculosis treatment. However, the majority of metabolites that most accurately distinguishedEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28782053 PMCID: PMC5537715 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Processes required for structural identification of molecular features (MFs) detected via untargeted LC–MS-based metabolomics and the different levels of identification based on guidelines provided by the Metabolomics Standards Initiatives.[3,8] The accurate mass of an MF of interest is interrogated against existing databases, a match to one or more annotated metabolites provides a putative identification, level 3. MS/MS spectrum of a level 3 metabolite or MF with no matches to annotated metabolites still provides increased structural information. A direct match of the experimental MS/MS spectrum to that of an annotated metabolite provides a level 2 putative structural identification. A partial match of the experimental MS/MS spectrum to that associated with one or more annotated metabolites can be used to derive a hypothesis for the metabolite structure, and experimental approaches can be undertaken to further elucidate or confirm the structure. This can be an iterative approach. A direct match of the metabolite’s mass, MS/MS spectra, and RT to that of an authentic standard under identical analytical conditions provides for full confirmation of structural identification, level 1 identity. The inability to use experimental mass or MS/MS data to identify or elucidate a structure results in the MF being designated as an unknown compound, level 4.
Figure 2LC–MS and LC–MS/MS of MF 202.1326 to provide structural information. (A) Extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of m/z 203.1390 from LC–MS data of human urine spiked with leucyl-alanine standard. The peak at 3.7 min is MF 202.1326. The peak at 11.1 min is leucyl–alanine. (B) LC–MS/MS spectra of MF 202.1326 at three collision energies; 10 V (top), 20 V (middle), and 40 V (bottom). (C) LC–MS/MS spectrum of MF 202.1326 (top) compared to that of N1-acetylspermine (middle) and N1,N12-diacetylspermine (bottom). All spectra were obtained with a collision energy of 20 V. The fragment ions m/z 100.076, 72.045, and 58.066 are present in the spectra of all three compounds.
Figure 3MS3 analysis of the m/z 100.076 fragment ion of MF 202.1326 and N1-acetylspermine. (A) Structure of N1-acetylspermine and the predicted origin of the m/z 100.076 fragment ion based on theoretical fragmentation. (B) MS3 fragmentation of m/z 100.076 from MF 202.1326 (top) and N1-acetylspermine (bottom). (C) Theoretical fragmentation tree used to derive the structure of the m/z 100.076 fragment ion.
Figure 4Hypothesized structure of MF 202.1326, N1-acetylisoputreanine. Fragmentation at the proximal C–N bond would yield an m/z 100.076 fragment ion [M + H]+ attributed to an acetamidopropyl group, and a neutral loss of 103.0633 Da [M] can be attributed to a hypothesized GABA constituent.
Figure 5Enzymatic and chemical synthesis of N1-acetylisoputreanine. (A) Diagram of the method used for enzymatic formation of 3-acetamidopropanol (box, solid line) and the subsequent generation of N1-acetylisoputreanine by the addition of GABA (box, dotted line). Reactions were performed in a single tube with sequential addition of reagents. (B–D) EICs from LC–MS analyses at different stages of the reaction. The m/z values of 245.234, 146.166, 116.071, and 203.139 were used in the EIC to monitor for N1-acetylspermine, spermidine, 3-acetamidopropanol, and N1-acetylisoputreanine, respectively. (B) N1-acetylspermine before the addition of PAOX. (C) Analysis of products after incubation with PAOX. (D) Analysis of products after reaction with GABA.
Figure 6LC–MS and MS/MS confirmation of MF 202.1326 as N1-acetylisoputreanine. (A) EIC for m/z 203.1390 from patient urine, synthetic standard reaction mixture, and patient urine spiked with synthetic standard reaction mixture. (B) MS/MS spectra for MF 202.1326 and synthetic standard at collision energies of 10 V (top two panels) and 20 V (bottom two panels).
Figure 7LC–MS and MS/MS analysis of N1-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam in patient urine. (A) EIC for m/z 185.1285 and m/z 203.1390 (inset) from N1-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam synthetic standard, patient urine spiked with N1-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam synthetic standard, and patient urine. (B) MS/MS spectrum comparison for N1-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam from urine and synthetic standard.
Stability (24 h) of Endogenous N1-Acetylisoputreanine and N1-Acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam in Fresh Urine at Room Temperature
| peak
area | peak
area | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 24 h | RPD | 0 h | 24 h | RPD | |
| sample 1 | 8 502 132 | 7 852 119 | 7.95 | 17 655 963 | 17 096 067 | 3.22 |
| sample 2 | 6 413 762 | 6 056 531 | 5.73 | 13 723 175 | 13 838 616 | –0.84 |
| sample 3 | 10 029 551 | 9 573 870 | 4.65 | 17 114 405 | 16 497 977 | 3.67 |
| sample 4 | 2 053 592 | 1 954 062 | 4.97 | 4 566 251 | 4 488 474 | 1.72 |
Relative percent difference.
Figure 8Polyamine interconversion cycle including proposed pathways for the formation of N1-acetylisoputreanine and N1-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam. Adapted from ref (13).