Literature DB >> 28781144

Regulation of repair pathway choice at two-ended DNA double-strand breaks.

Atsushi Shibata1.   

Abstract

A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is considered to be a critical DNA lesion because its misrepair can cause severe mutations, such as deletions or chromosomal translocations. For the precise repair of DSBs, the repair pathway that is optimal for the particular circumstance needs to be selected. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) functions in G1/S/G2 phase, while homologous recombination (HR) becomes active only in S/G2 phase after DNA replication. DSB end structure is another factor affecting the repair pathway. For example, one-ended DSBs in S phase are mainly repaired by HR due to the lack of a partner DSB end for NHEJ. In contrast, two-ended DSBs, which are mainly induced by ionizing radiation, are repaired by either NHEJ or HR in G2 cells. Under the current model in terms of DSB repair pathway usage in G2 phase, NHEJ repairs ∼70% of two-ended DSBs, whereas HR repairs only ∼30%. Recent studies propose that NHEJ factors can bind all the DSB ends and are then either used to progress that pathway of DSB repair, or the repair proceeds by HR. In addition, molecular regulation by BRCA1 and 53BP1 has also been proposed. At DSB sites, BRCA1 functions to alleviate the 53BP1 barrier to resection by promoting 53BP1 dephosphorylation, followed by RIF1 release and 53BP1 repositioning. This timely 53BP1 repositioning may be important for the establishment of a chromatin environment that promotes the recruitment of EXO1 for resection in HR. This review summarizes current knowledge on factors regulating DSB repair pathway choice in terms of spatiotemporal regulation by focusing on the repair events at two-ended DSBs in G2 cells.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  53BP1; BRCA1; DSB; HR; NHEJ; Two-ended DSB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28781144     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  52 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the Histone DNA Repair Code: H4K20me2 Makes Its Mark.

Authors:  Karissa L Paquin; Niall G Howlett
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  Predicting the mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Felicity Allen; Luca Crepaldi; Clara Alsinet; Alexander J Strong; Vitalii Kleshchevnikov; Pietro De Angeli; Petra Páleníková; Anton Khodak; Vladimir Kiselev; Michael Kosicki; Andrew R Bassett; Heather Harding; Yaron Galanty; Francisco Muñoz-Martínez; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Stephen P Jackson; Leopold Parts
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Pathogenic Germline Mutations in DNA Repair Genes in Combination With Cancer Treatment Exposures and Risk of Subsequent Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Authors:  Na Qin; Zhaoming Wang; Qi Liu; Nan Song; Carmen L Wilson; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Kyla Shelton; John Easton; Heather Mulder; Dennis Kennetz; Michael N Edmonson; Michael C Rusch; James R Downing; Melissa M Hudson; Kim E Nichols; Jinghui Zhang; Leslie L Robison; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes.

Authors:  Lepakshi Ranjha; Sean M Howard; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  The MCM8/9 complex: A recent recruit to the roster of helicases involved in genome maintenance.

Authors:  Wezley C Griffin; Michael A Trakselis
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-05

6.  Homolog-Dependent Repair Following Dicentric Chromosome Breakage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jayaram Bhandari; Travis Karg; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  DNA damage and tissue repair: What we can learn from planaria.

Authors:  Paul G Barghouth; Manish Thiruvalluvan; Melanie LeGro; Néstor J Oviedo
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Nonhomologous End Joining Is More Important Than Proton Linear Energy Transfer in Dictating Cell Death.

Authors:  Scott J Bright; David B Flint; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Conor H McFadden; David S Yoon; Lawrence Bronk; Uwe Titt; Radhe Mohan; David R Grosshans; Pavel Sumazin; Simona F Shaitelman; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Reconsidering pathway choice: a sequential model of mammalian DNA double-strand break pathway decisions.

Authors:  Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 10.  Collaborations between chromatin and nuclear architecture to optimize DNA repair fidelity.

Authors:  Beata Mackenroth; Eric Alani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.