Scott J Bright1, David B Flint2, Sharmistha Chakraborty3, Conor H McFadden1, David S Yoon1, Lawrence Bronk3, Uwe Titt1, Radhe Mohan1, David R Grosshans4, Pavel Sumazin5, Simona F Shaitelman6, Aroumougame Asaithamby7, Gabriel O Sawakuchi8. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Texas Children's Cancer Center and Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 8. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: gsawakuchi@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study seeks to identify biological factors that may yield a therapeutic advantage of proton therapy versus photon therapy. Specifically, we address the role of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) in the survival of cells in response to clinical photon and proton beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We irradiated HT1080, M059K (DNA-PKcs+/+), and HCC1937 human cancer cell lines and their isogenic counterparts HT1080-shDNA-PKcs, HT1080-shRAD51IND, M059J (DNA-PKcs-/-), and HCC1937-BRCA1 (BRCA1 complemented) to assess cell clonogenic survival and γ-H2AX radiation-induced foci. Cells were irradiated with either clinically relevant photons or 1 of 3 proton linear energy transfer (LET) values. RESULTS: Our results indicate that NHEJ deficiency is more important in dictating cell survival than proton LET. Cells with disrupted HR through BRCA1 mutation showed increased radiosensitivity only for high-LET protons whereas RAD51 depletion showed increased radiosensitivity for both photons and protons. DNA double strand breaks, assessed by γ-H2AX radiation-induced foci, showed greater numbers after 24 hours in cells exposed to higher LET protons. We also observed that NHEJ-deficient cells were unable to repair the vast majority of double strand breaks after 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 mutation significantly sensitizes cells to protons, but not photons. Loss of NHEJ renders cells hypersensitive to radiation, whereas the relative importance of HR increases with LET across several cell lines. This may be attributable to the more clustered damage induced by higher LET protons, which are harder to repair through NHEJ. This highlights the importance of tumor biology in dictating treatment modality and suggests BRCA1 as a potential biomarker for proton therapy response. Our data also support the use of pharmacologic inhibitors of DNA repair to enhance the sensitivity to different radiation types, although this raises issues for normal tissue toxicity.
PURPOSE: This study seeks to identify biological factors that may yield a therapeutic advantage of proton therapy versus photon therapy. Specifically, we address the role of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) in the survival of cells in response to clinical photon and proton beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We irradiated HT1080, M059K (DNA-PKcs+/+), and HCC1937 human cancer cell lines and their isogenic counterparts HT1080-shDNA-PKcs, HT1080-shRAD51IND, M059J (DNA-PKcs-/-), and HCC1937-BRCA1 (BRCA1 complemented) to assess cell clonogenic survival and γ-H2AX radiation-induced foci. Cells were irradiated with either clinically relevant photons or 1 of 3 proton linear energy transfer (LET) values. RESULTS: Our results indicate that NHEJ deficiency is more important in dictating cell survival than proton LET. Cells with disrupted HR through BRCA1 mutation showed increased radiosensitivity only for high-LET protons whereas RAD51 depletion showed increased radiosensitivity for both photons and protons. DNA double strand breaks, assessed by γ-H2AX radiation-induced foci, showed greater numbers after 24 hours in cells exposed to higher LET protons. We also observed that NHEJ-deficient cells were unable to repair the vast majority of double strand breaks after 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 mutation significantly sensitizes cells to protons, but not photons. Loss of NHEJ renders cells hypersensitive to radiation, whereas the relative importance of HR increases with LET across several cell lines. This may be attributable to the more clustered damage induced by higher LET protons, which are harder to repair through NHEJ. This highlights the importance of tumor biology in dictating treatment modality and suggests BRCA1 as a potential biomarker for proton therapy response. Our data also support the use of pharmacologic inhibitors of DNA repair to enhance the sensitivity to different radiation types, although this raises issues for normal tissue toxicity.
Authors: Nicole Grosse; Andrea O Fontana; Eugen B Hug; Antony Lomax; Adolf Coray; Marc Augsburger; Harald Paganetti; Alessandro A Sartori; Martin Pruschy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stefan C Genet; Junko Maeda; Hiroshi Fujisawa; Charles R Yurkon; Yoshihiro Fujii; Ashley M Romero; Paula C Genik; Akira Fujimori; Hisashi Kitamura; Takamitsu A Kato Journal: Oncol Rep Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Bhavana V Chapman; Diane Liu; Yu Shen; Oluwafikayo O Olamigoke; David S Lakomy; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Shane R Stecklein; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Scott J Bright; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Benjamin D Smith; Wendy A Woodward; George H Perkins; Karen E Hoffman; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; Banu K Arun; Simona F Shaitelman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-10-03 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Laura Vanderwaeren; Rüveyda Dok; Karin Voordeckers; Laura Vandemaele; Kevin J Verstrepen; Sandra Nuyts Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-05-14 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Klaudia Szymonowicz; Adam Krysztofiak; Jansje van der Linden; Ajvar Kern; Simon Deycmar; Sebastian Oeck; Anthony Squire; Benjamin Koska; Julian Hlouschek; Melanie Vüllings; Christian Neander; Jens T Siveke; Johann Matschke; Martin Pruschy; Beate Timmermann; Verena Jendrossek Journal: Cells Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 6.600