Literature DB >> 28780022

Inferring rooted species trees from unrooted gene trees using approximate Bayesian computation.

Ayed R A Alanzi1, James H Degnan2.   

Abstract

Methods for inferring species trees from gene trees motivated by incomplete lineage sorting typically use either rooted gene trees to infer a rooted species tree, or use unrooted gene trees to infer an unrooted species tree, which is then typically rooted using one or more outgroups. Theoretically, however, it has been known since 2011 that it is possible to consistently infer the root of the species tree directly from unrooted gene trees without assuming an outgroup. Here, we use approximate Bayesian computation to infer the root of the species tree from unrooted gene trees assuming the multispecies coalescent model. It is hoped that this approach will be useful in cases where an appropriate outgroup is difficult to find and gene trees do not follow a molecular clock. We use approximate Bayesian computation to infer the root of the species tree from unrooted gene trees. This approach could also be useful when there is prior information that makes a small number of root locations plausible in an unrooted species tree.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Identifiability; Midpoint rooting; Molecular clock; Multispecies coalescent; Outgroup; Sufficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28780022      PMCID: PMC5680165          DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  61 in total

1.  Algorithms for MDC-based multi-locus phylogeny inference: beyond rooted binary gene trees on single alleles.

Authors:  Yun Yu; Tandy Warnow; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) in practice.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Michael G B Blum; Oscar E Gaggiotti; Olivier François
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Dennis K Pearl; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Maximum tree: a consistent estimator of the species tree.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Dennis K Pearl
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Counting coalescent histories.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.

Authors:  Sebastien Roch; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  DO PHYLOGENETIC METHODS PRODUCE TREES WITH BIASED SHAPES?

Authors:  John P Huelsenbeck; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence.

Authors:  Laura S Kubatko; Bryan C Carstens; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships.

Authors:  Cuong Than; Derek Ruths; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modeling Hybridization Under the Network Multispecies Coalescent.

Authors:  James H Degnan
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Split Probabilities and Species Tree Inference Under the Multispecies Coalescent Model.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; James H Degnan; John A Rhodes
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Statistical inconsistency of the unrooted minimize deep coalescence criterion.

Authors:  Ayed A R Alanzi; James H Degnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiple genetic analyses to investigate the polymorphisms of Chinese Mongolian population with an efficient short tandem repeat panel.

Authors:  Yating Fang; Tong Xie; Qiong Lan; Xiaoye Jin; Yuxin Guo; Yongsong Zhou; Jiangwei Yan; Bofeng Zhu
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.351

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.