Literature DB >> 18626701

Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis.

Jon C Gould1, Chirag Dholakia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a low-morbidity treatment option that may be effective for refractory symptoms in patients with gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology. During surgery to initiate GES, two electrodes are tunneled in the gastric antrum in a precise location. If these electrodes pass through the mucosa and into the gastric lumen (determined by endoscopy) they must be repositioned, often multiple times. During this procedure, extensive suturing to anchor the electrodes is necessary once properly placed. Robotic surgical systems may provide surgeons with several technical and ergonomic advantages during this procedure when compared with a standard laparoscopic approach.
METHODS: Over a 26-month period, 22 GES systems were implanted. The initial procedures were performed laparoscopically. After the first 15 laparoscopic cases, a technique for robotically implanting leads was developed and employed for the remainder of the series. Demographics, operative time, and endoscopically confirmed electrode mucosal perforations were quantified and compared based on operative approach.
RESULTS: Patients were similar demographically. Total operative time did not differ based on technique (152 +/- 40 min laparoscopic versus 158 +/- 38 min robotic placement; p = 0.6). Mucosal perforations on first attempt at electrode placement occurred more frequently with the laparoscopic than with the robotic technique (15/30 laparoscopic versus 1/14 robotic; p = 0.006). There were no procedure-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The robotic approach to GES electrode implantation is feasible and safe. Compared with standard laparoscopic techniques, the accurate insertion and anchoring of these leads can be accomplished more efficiently and comfortably using robotic techniques. Whether robotic GES electrode placement will result in significant clinical advantages for patients will require long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626701     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0063-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.

Authors:  L Chang; R M Satava; C A Pellegrini; M N Sinanan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Symptom responses, long-term outcomes and adverse events beyond 3 years of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Z Lin; I Sarosiek; J Forster; R W McCallum
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

4.  Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis.

Authors:  Thomas L Abell; Eric Van Cutsem; Hasse Abrahamsson; Jan D Huizinga; J W Konturek; Jean Paul Galmiche; Guy VoelIer; Ludo Filez; Bernt Everts; William E Waterfall; W Domschke; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Babajide O Familoni; Ivan M Bourgeois; Jozef Janssens; Gervais Tougas
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  S Abu-Abeid; A Keidar; N Gavert; A Blanc; A Szold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: occurrence and results after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Michel Suter; Vittorio Giusti; Eric Héraief; Jean-Marie Calmes
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis.

Authors:  Thomas Abell; Richard McCallum; Michael Hocking; Kenneth Koch; Hasse Abrahamsson; Isabelle Leblanc; Greger Lindberg; Jan Konturek; Thomas Nowak; Eammon M M Quigley; Gervais Tougas; Warren Starkebaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Gastric electrical stimulation is safe and effective: a long-term study in patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis in three regional centers.

Authors:  Curuchi Anand; Amar Al-Juburi; Babajide Familoni; Hani Rashed; Teresa Cutts; Nighat Abidi; William D Johnson; Anil Minocha; Thomas L Abell
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopy shortens length of stay in patients with gastric electrical stimulators.

Authors:  Amar Al-Juburi; Stephanie Granger; James Barnes; Guy Voeller; Derrick Beech; Hosein Amiri; Thomas L Abell
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  5 in total

1.  Robotic gastric electrical stimulator placement: technique and literature review.

Authors:  Shireesh Saurabh; Grant O Lee; Hui Sen Chong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

2.  Effectiveness and feasibility of robotic gastric neurostimulator placement in patients with refractory gastroparesis.

Authors:  Mia Mowzoon; Francisco Igor B Macedo; Jaskiran Kaur; Ramachandra Kolachalam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Tailored approach to gastroparesis significantly improves symptoms.

Authors:  Lauren E Arthur; Lauren Slattery; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pyloroplasty Combined with Gastric Electrical Stimulation Therapy in Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Brian R Davis; Irene Sarosiek; Mohammad Bashashati; Ben Alvarado; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Preoperative predictors of significant symptomatic response after 1 year of gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Sandeepa Musunuru; Gretchen Beverstein; Jon Gould
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.