| Literature DB >> 28779068 |
Chang Liu1, Xiaojun Wei2, Feng Li3, Li Wang1, Xinjian Ruan1, Jia Jia1, Xia Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the present study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of epithelial membrane protein 1 (EMP-1) gene in patients diagnosed with laryngeal carcinoma (LC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with LC were enrolled in the present study. The expression levels of EMP-1 in tumor tissues and corresponding normal tissues collected from the LC patients were detected by semi-reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (semi-RT-PCR). Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between EMP-1 expression level and clinical characteristics. Survival analysis for the study population was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test. Additionally, Cox regression model was applied to evaluate the prognostic value of EMP-1 in LC patients. RESULTS 106 LC patients, including 55 men and 51 women, were enrolled in the present study. Semi-RT-PCR demonstrated that the expression level of EMP-1 was decreased in tumor tissues, compared with adjacent normal tissues (p<0.001). Moreover, the level was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, histological grade, and clinical stage (p<0.05 for all). In addition, low levels of EMP-1 was significantly correlated with poor survival rate (log rank test, p=0.020). Cox regression analysis indicated that EMP-1 was an independent marker for LC prognosis (HR=2.755, 95% CI=1.123-6.760, p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS The abnormal expression of EMP-1 may be associated with progression of LC and the gene may act as a prognostic marker for LC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28779068 PMCID: PMC5555703 DOI: 10.12659/msm.901161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Demographic characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristics | Case (n) | EMP-1 high expression group (n=64) | EMP-1 low expression group (n=42) | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.508 | 0.476 | |||
| Male | 55 | 35 | 20 | ||
| Female | 51 | 29 | 22 | ||
| Age (year) | 0.512 | 0.474 | |||
| >60 | 65 | 41 | 24 | ||
| ≤60 | 41 | 23 | 18 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.006 | 0.940 | |||
| >2 | 50 | 30 | 20 | ||
| ≤2 | 56 | 34 | 22 | ||
| Smoking history | 2.299 | 0.129 | |||
| Yes | 56 | 30 | 26 | ||
| No | 50 | 34 | 16 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 8.582 | 0.003 | |||
| Yes | 40 | 17 | 23 | ||
| No | 66 | 47 | 19 | ||
| Histological grade | 5.679 | 0.017 | |||
| G1/G2 | 53 | 38 | 15 | ||
| G3 | 55 | 26 | 27 | ||
| Clinical stage | 8.206 | 0.004 | |||
| I/II | 51 | 38 | 13 | ||
| III/IV | 55 | 26 | 29 |
Figure 1Relative expression of EMP-1 in tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (A) The expression level of EMP-1 was lower in LC tissues than in the corresponding normal tissues detected by semi-RT-PCR. ***: indicated p<0.001. (B) EMP-1 expression in protein levels measured by Western blotting was significant decreased in LC tissue specimens compared with the matched noncancerous tissue samples. β-actin was used as the reference.
Figure 2Overall survival analysis for LC patients according to EMP-1 expression. Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test was applied to evaluate overall survival for LC patients. Analysis results indicated that patients with high level of EMP-1 had a higher survival rate than those with low level (log rank test, p=0.020).
Prognosis analysis for laryngeal carcinoma patients by cox regression analysis.
| Characteristics | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | P | HR | 95%CI | P | |
| 2.755 | 1.123–7.670 | 0.027 | 2.755 | 1.123–7.670 | 0.027 | |
| Gender (Male | 0.940 | 0.412–2.149 | 0.884 | – | – | – |
| Age (>60 | 1.053 | 0.457–2.424 | 0.904 | – | – | – |
| Smoking history (Yes | 1.388 | 0.580–3.321 | 0.462 | – | – | – |
| Tumor size (>2 | 1.383 | 0.606–3.157 | 0.441 | – | – | – |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes | 1.917 | 0.845–4.350 | 0.119 | – | – | – |
| Histological stage (G3 | 1.192 | 0.522–2.718 | 0.677 | – | – | – |
| Clinical stage (III/IV | 2.168 | 0.890–5.283 | 0.089 | – | – | – |
‘–’ – Indicated no available data.