Literature DB >> 26766421

Expression of MAGE-A1, -A9, -A11 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic significance: a retrospective clinical study.

Shenghui Liu1,2, Meixiang Sang1, Yuru Xu2, Lina Gu1, Fei Liu1, Baoen Shan1.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: The melanoma-associated antigens A1, -A9, -A11 (MAGE-A1, -A9, -A11) are relatively tumor-specific in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), and could be ideal antigens for LSCC immunotherapy. In addition, MAGE-A9 probably is a poor prognostic marker for LSCC patients.
OBJECTIVE: The MAGE-A family belongs to Cancer/testis antigens (CTA). However, the expression pattern of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, and MAGE-A11 in LSCC is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the expression and possible prognostic role of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, and MAGE-A11 in LSCC patients.
METHODS: The expression of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, and MAGE-A11 in LSCC specimens was investigated by immunohistochemistry, and the association of their expression and the clinical parameters and the survival of LSCC patients were analyzed by chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: The expression rates of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, and MAGE-A11 in LSCC were 54.7%, 46.2%, and 51.9%, respectively. The expression of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, and MAGE-A11 in LSCC was correlated with clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size. The overall survival of LSCC patients with positive MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, or MAGE-A11 expression was lower than the patients without MAGE-A1, MAGE-A9, or MAGE-A11 expression. Cox's multivariable analysis showed that MAGE-A9 expression was an independently poor prognostic factor for LSCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAGE-A1; MAGE-A11; MAGE-A9; laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC); prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26766421     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1126856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  7 in total

1.  Evolution of Melanoma Antigen-A11 (MAGEA11) During Primate Phylogeny.

Authors:  Christopher S Willett; Elizabeth M Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  The Prognostic Value of Epithelial Membrane Protein 1 (EMP-1) in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Xiaojun Wei; Feng Li; Li Wang; Xinjian Ruan; Jia Jia; Xia Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-08-05

3.  MAGE-A gene expression in peripheral blood serves as a poor prognostic marker for patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Lina Gu; Meixiang Sang; Danjing Yin; Fei Liu; Yunyan Wu; Shina Liu; Weina Huang; Baoen Shan
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Genetic variations in MAGE-A11 predict the risk and survival of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Shifeng Su; Qi Gu; Aiming Xu; Sipeng Shen; Shouyong Liu; Chao Zhang; Chengkui Miao; Chao Qin; Bianjiang Liu; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Developing Classifications of Laryngeal Dysplasia: The Historical Basis.

Authors:  Henrik Hellquist; Alfio Ferlito; Antti A Mäkitie; Lester D R Thompson; Justin A Bishop; Abbas Agaimy; Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Douglas R Gnepp; Stefan M Willems; Pieter J Slootweg; Alessandra Rinaldo
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Genome-wide identification of cancer/testis genes and their association with prognosis in a pan-cancer analysis.

Authors:  Vandeclecio Lira da Silva; André Faustino Fonseca; Marbella Fonseca; Thayna Emilia da Silva; Ana Carolina Coelho; José Eduardo Kroll; Jorge Estefano Santana de Souza; Beatriz Stransky; Gustavo Antonio de Souza; Sandro José de Souza
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-10

7.  Prognostic Value of Melanoma-Associated Antigen-A (MAGE-A) Gene Expression in Various Human Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 7428 Patients and 44 Studies.

Authors:  Manish Poojary; Padacherri Vethil Jishnu; Shama Prasada Kabekkodu
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.074

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.