Literature DB >> 28776315

Early post-STEMI PET, a judicious investment?

Riemer H J A Slart1,2, Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28776315     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-017-1015-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Gilda Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Arkadiusz Sitek; Michael J Pencina; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?

Authors:  Esa Joutsiniemi; Antti Saraste; Mikko Pietilä; Maija Mäki; Sami Kajander; Heikki Ukkonen; Juhani Airaksinen; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  PET-determined hyperemic myocardial blood flow: further progress to clinical application.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction or suspected or known coronary artery disease: a systematic review of prognostic studies.

Authors:  Hamza El Aidi; Arthur Adams; Karel G M Moons; Hester M Den Ruijter; Willem P Th M Mali; Pieter A Doevendans; Eike Nagel; Simon Schalla; Michiel L Bots; Tim Leiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2013-02-01

7.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Guido Germano
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01

10.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study.

Authors:  Sergey V Nesterov; Emmanuel Deshayes; John O Prior; Juhani M Knuuti; Roberto Sciagrà; Leonardo Settimo; Jerome M Declerck; Xiao-Bo Pan; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Piotr J Slomka; Guido Germano; Chunlei Han; Ville Aalto; Adam M Alessio; Edward P Ficaro; Benjamin C Lee; Stephan G Nekolla; Kilem L Gwet; Robert A deKemp; Ran Klein; John Dickson; James A Case; Timothy Bateman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.