Literature DB >> 24486280

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction or suspected or known coronary artery disease: a systematic review of prognostic studies.

Hamza El Aidi1, Arthur Adams2, Karel G M Moons3, Hester M Den Ruijter4, Willem P Th M Mali2, Pieter A Doevendans5, Eike Nagel6, Simon Schalla7, Michiel L Bots3, Tim Leiner2.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to review the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging findings for future cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) and patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). Although the diagnostic value of CMR findings is established, the independent prognostic association with future cardiovascular events remains largely unclear. Studies published by February 2013, identified by systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, were reviewed for associations between CMR findings (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], wall motion abnormalities [WMA], abnormal myocardial perfusion, microvascular obstruction, late gadolinium enhancement, edema, and intramyocardial hemorrhage) and hard events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, cardiac transplantation, and MI) or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (hard events and other cardiovascular events defined by the authors of the evaluated papers). Fifty-six studies (n = 25,497) were evaluated. For patients with recent MI, too few patients were evaluated to establish associations between CMR findings and hard events. LVEF (range of adjusted hazard ratios [HRs]: 1.03 to 1.05 per % decrease) was independently associated with MACE. In patients with suspected or known CAD, WMA (adjusted HRs: 1.87 to 2.99), inducible perfusion defects (adjusted HRs: 3.02 to 7.77), LVEF (adjusted HRs: 0.72 to 0.82 per 10% increase), and infarction (adjusted HRs: 2.82 to 9.43) were independently associated with hard events, and the presence of inducible perfusion defects was associated with MACE (adjusted HRs: 1.76 to 3.21). The independent predictor of future cardiovascular events for patients with a recent MI was LVEF, and the predictors for patients with suspected or known CAD were WMA, inducible perfusion defects, LVEF, and presence of infarction.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac magnetic resonance; prognosis; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486280     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  42 in total

1.  Early post-STEMI PET, a judicious investment?

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of myocardial necrosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correctly risk stratify patients with stable coronary artery disease: a multi-center all-comers trial.

Authors:  Dominik Buckert; Sebastian Kelle; Sebastian Buss; Grigorios Korosoglou; Rolf Gebker; Ralf Birkemeyer; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Hugo Katus; Burkert Pieske; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  T-Wave Alternans Is Linked to Microvascular Obstruction and to Recurrent Coronary Ischemia After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  V Floré; P Claus; M A Vos; B Vandenberk; S Van Soest; K R Sipido; T Adriaenssens; J Bogaert; W Desmet; R Willems
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Evaluation of myocardial viability in old myocardial infarcted patients with CHF: delayed enhancement MRI vs. low-dose dobutamine stress speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Chaofan Wang; Shuguang Han; Tongda Xu; Fengli Wang; Xiaoping Wang; Jing Chen; Chunfeng Hu; Dongye Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Value of MRI in medicine: More than just another test?

Authors:  Edwin J R van Beek; Christiane Kuhl; Yoshimi Anzai; Patricia Desmond; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Gong; Garry Gold; Vikas Gulani; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Tim Leiner; C C Tschoyoson Lim; James G Pipe; Scott Reeder; Caroline Reinhold; Marion Smits; Daniel K Sodickson; Clare Tempany; H Alberto Vargas; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Pharmacokinetics and microbiodistribution of 64Cu-labeled collagen-binding peptides in chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Sung-Jin Lee; Jin Su Kim; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Hong-Jun Cho; Samuel J Won; Eden Dejene; Zhengsheng Yao; Insook Kim; Chang H Paik; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  Association between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and coronary artery disease as well as its extent and severity.

Authors:  Lai-Jing Du; Ping-Shuan Dong; Jing-Jing Jia; Xi-Mei Fan; Xu-Ming Yang; Shao-Xin Wang; Xi-Shan Yang; Zhi-Juan Li; Hong-Lei Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial perfusion and diastolic function-reference control values for women.

Authors:  May Bakir; Janet Wei; Michael D Nelson; Puja K Mehta; Afsaneh Haftbaradaran; Erika Jones; Edward Gill; Behzad Sharif; Piotr J Slomka; Debiao Li; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Margo Minissian; Daniel S Berman; C Noel Bairey Merz; Louise E J Thomson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02

Review 10.  Clinical decision making with myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Paul Cremer; Rory Hachamovitch; Balaji Tamarappoo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.