Literature DB >> 28772298

Measurement of Gamma-Irradiated Corneal Patch Graft Thickness After Aqueous Drainage Device Surgery.

Regina A de Luna1, Ameera Moledina2, Jiangxia Wang3, Henry D Jampel1.   

Abstract

Importance: Exposure of the tube of an aqueous drainage device (ADD) through the conjunctiva is a serious complication of ADD surgery. Although placement of gamma-irradiated sterile cornea (GISC) as a patch graft over the tube is commonly performed, exposures still occur.
Objectives: To measure GISC patch graft thickness as a function of time after surgery, estimate the rate of graft thinning, and determine risk factors for graft thinning. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of graft thickness using anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was conducted at the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins Hospital. A total of 107 patients (120 eyes, 120 ADDs) 18 years or older who underwent ADD surgery at Johns Hopkins with GISC patch graft between July 1, 2010, and October 31, 2016, were enrolled. Intervention: Implantation of ADD with placement of GISC patch graft over the tube. Main Outcomes and Measures: Graft thickness vs time after ADD surgery and risk factors for undetectable graft.
Results: Of the 107 patients included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 64 (16.2) years, 49 (45.8%) were male, and 43 (40.2%) were African American. The mean time of measurement after surgery was 1.7 years (range, 1 day to 6 years). Thinner grafts were observed as the time after surgery lengthened (β regression coefficient, -60 µm per year since surgery; 95% CI, -80 µm to -40 µm). The odds ratio of undetectable grafts per year after ADD surgery was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.5-3.0; P < .001). Age, sex, race, type of ADD, quadrant of ADD placement, diagnosis of uveitis or dry eye, and prior conjunctival surgery were not correlated with the presence or absence of the graft. Conclusions and Relevance: Gamma-irradiated sterile corneal patch grafts do not always retain their integrity after ADD surgery. Data from this cross-sectional study showed that on average, the longer the time after surgery, the thinner the graft. These findings suggest that placement of a GISC patch graft is no guarantee against tube exposure, and that better strategies are needed for preventing this complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28772298      PMCID: PMC5710544          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.2628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  25 in total

1.  Use of amniotic membrane graft in glaucoma shunt surgery.

Authors:  Aashish Anand; Hosam Sheha; Christopher C Teng; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Celso Tello
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011 May-Jun

2.  A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage.

Authors:  M Fran Smith; J William Doyle; John W Ticrney
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Scleral patch grafts with Molteno setons.

Authors:  J Freedman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1987-07

4.  Fascia lata patch graft in glaucoma tube surgery.

Authors:  T M Tanji; D C Lundy; D S Minckler; D K Heuer; R Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The intraoperative impression and postoperative outcomes of gamma-irradiated corneas in corneal and glaucoma patch surgery.

Authors:  Yassine J Daoud; Ronald Smith; Tessie Smith; Esen K Akpek; Donald E Ward; Walter J Stark
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Evaluation of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation through a needle-generated scleral tunnel in Mexican children with glaucoma.

Authors:  Oscar Albis-Donado; Félix Gil-Carrasco; Rafael Romero-Quijada; Ravi Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma.

Authors:  R S Ayyala; D Zurakowski; J A Smith; R Monshizadeh; P A Netland; D W Richards; W E Layden
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas.

Authors:  D S Minckler; D K Heuer; B Hasty; G Baerveldt; R C Cutting; W E Barlow
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Tube shunt coverage with gamma-irradiated cornea allograft (VisionGraft).

Authors:  Feyzahan Ekici; Marlene R Moster; Victor Cvintal; Wanda D Hu; Michael Waisbourd
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-04

10.  Partial thickness corneal tissue as a patch graft material for prevention of glaucoma drainage device exposure.

Authors:  Oriel Spierer; Michael Waisbourd; Yitzhak Golan; Hadas Newman; Rony Rachmiel
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  3 in total

1.  Outcomes of the Shunt Tube Exposure Prevention Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hosam Sheha; Celso Tello; Lama A Al-Aswad; Mohamed S Sayed; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  The best thickness of cornea graft from SMILE surgery as patch graft in glaucoma drainage implant surgery.

Authors:  Yuhong Wang; Jinkun Liu; Weiyi Huang; Yazhang Xu; Meizhu Cheng; Zhengwei Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Assessing patient cosmetic satisfaction after glaucoma drainage device surgery for different patch grafts.

Authors:  Doaa S Milibari; Dalal Fatani; Abeer Ahmad; Ohoud Owaidhah; Saleh A AlObeidan; Faisal A Almobarak; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.