| Literature DB >> 28770545 |
Sami Hraiech1,2, Jean-Marie Forel3, Christophe Guervilly3, Romain Rambaud3, Samuel Lehingue3, Mélanie Adda3, Pierre Sylla3, Sabine Valera3, Julien Carvelli4, Marc Gainnier4, Laurent Papazian3, Jérémy Bourenne4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) have been shown to improve the outcome of the most severely hypoxemic, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, the recommended dosage as well as the necessity of monitoring the neuromuscular block is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of a nurse-directed protocol of NMBA administration based on a train-of-four (TOF) assessment to ensure a profound neuromuscular block and decrease cisatracurium consumption compared to an elevated and constant dose regimen. A prospective open labeled study was conducted in two medical intensive care units of two French university hospitals. Consecutive ARDS patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 120 with a PEEP ≥5 cm H2O were included. Cisatracurium administration was driven by the nurses according to an algorithm based on TOF monitoring. The primary endpoint was cisatracurium consumption. The secondary endpoints included the quality of the neuromuscular block, the occurrence of adverse events, and the evolution of ventilatory and blood gas parameters.Entities:
Keywords: ARDS; Cisatracurium; Cost; Neuromuscular blockers; Train-of-four
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770545 PMCID: PMC5540745 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-017-0305-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intensive Care ISSN: 2110-5820 Impact factor: 6.925
Fig. 1Nurse-directed protocol of TOF monitoring and cisatracurium management
Patient characteristics at the time of inclusion
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 30 |
| Age (years) mean ± SD | 60 ± 16 |
| SAPS 2 score median (IQR) | 46 (38–53.5) |
| SOFA score median (IQR) | 8 (7–10) |
| Etiology of ARDS no./total no. (%) | Community acquired pneumonia 11/30 (37) |
| Ventilator associated pneumonia 10/30 (33) | |
| Aspiration pneumonia 6/30 (20) | |
| Extra pulmonary ARDS 3/30 (10) | |
| Topography of ARDS no./total no. (%) | Lobar ARDS 13/30 (43) |
| Diffuse ARDS 17/30 (57) | |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio median (IQR) | 102 (77–120) |
| Vt (mL) ± SD | 385 ± 76 |
| Vt mL/kg (PBW) | 6.1 ± 1.1 |
| Pplat median (IQR) | 25 (22–27) |
| PEEP median (IQR) | 10 (8–14) |
| FiO2 median (IQR) | 75 (60–100) |
| Other conditions no./total no. (%) | Septic shock 27/30 (90) |
| Renal replacement therapy 1/30 (3) | |
Evolution of ventilatory parameters and blood gas exchange from day 1 to day 4
| Days after inclusion | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 30 | 28 | 27 | 27 |
| Vt (mL) ± SD | 385 ± 76 | 384 ± 62 | 387 ± 68 | 387 ± 47 |
| Vt mL/kg (IBW) | 6.1 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 6.2 ± 0.7 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio median (IQR) | 102 (77–120) | 143 (112–207) | 161 (132–239) | 154 (134–227) |
| Pplat median (IQR) | 25 (22–27) | 25 (23–27) | 26 (24–27) | 26 (23–27) |
| Driving pressure cm H2O median (IQR) | 13 (11–16) | 13 (11–15) | 14 (12–16) | 14 (10–16) |
Fig. 2Mean daily cisatracurium dosage. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The constant horizontal bar represents the theoretical dosage that would have been used following the ACURASYS study protocol (37.5 mg/h). *p < 0.001 between ACURASYS and TOF-ARDS dosage
Fig. 3Cumulative cisatracurium doses received by the study patients compared to the theoretical dosage that would have been administered according to the ACURASYS study. The box plot limits represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the bars represent the 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is represented as a horizontal line. Extreme values are represented by circles
Fig. 4Cisatracurium dosage changes from day 1 to day 4. Each circle represents a patient. The total number of patients still receiving cisatracurium is given on the abscissa axis
Univariate analysis evaluating the factors associated with increase(s) in cisatracurium dosage
| Variables | No cisatracurium dosage increase | Cisatracurium dosage increases |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 64 (47–70) | 63 (53–76) | 0.54 |
| Female, | 5 (28) | 2 (17) | 0.67 |
| Height, cms | 170 (160–175) | 170 (161–174) | 0.66 |
| Weight, kgs | 74 (59–86) | 82 (68–110) | 0.14 |
| SAPS 2 | 47 (28–54) | 44 (41–53) | 0.78 |
| SOFA | 8 (7–12) | 8 (7–10) | 0.37 |
| Characteristics at day 1 | |||
| Vt, mL | 410 (380–420) | 390 (360–437) | 0.60 |
| Vt, mL/kg (PBW) | 6.2 (5.6–6.8) | 6.2 (5.4–6.78) | 0.85 |
| Respiratory rate | 26 (22–28) | 24 (20–27) | 0.25 |
| PEEP, cm H20 | 12 (10–14) | 8 (8–11.5) | 0.008 |
| Pplat, cm H20 | 25 (22–26) | 25 (22–27) | 0.92 |
| Driving pressure, cm H2O | 12 (10–15) | 15 (13–16) | 0.017 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio | 92 (70–119) | 107 (100–121) | 0.14 |
| Severe versus moderate ARDS, | 10 (55) | 3 (25) | 0.14 |
| pH | 7.32 (7.22–7.36) | 7.33 (7.30–7.42) | 0.49 |
| PaCO2, mmHg | 47 (39–57) | 44 (41–57) | 0.92 |
| Prone position, | 10 (55) | 3 (25) | 0.14 |
| Bicarbonates, mmol/L | 24 (21–29) | 27 (24–32) | 0.15 |
| Lactate, mmol/L | 1.28 (1.10–1.91) | 1.27 (0.97–2.22) | 0.87 |
| Vasopressor use, | 17 (94) | 10 (83) | 0.55 |
| Norepinephrine, mg/h | 1.1 (0.55–2.5) | 1 (0.0–1.7) | 0.32 |
| Body temperature, °C | 38.1 (37.5–38.6) | 38.1 (37.4–38.6) | 0.95 |
| Ketamine use, | 5 (28) | 4 (33) | 1 |
| Other organ failure, ( | 1/13/4/0 | 3/4/4/1 | 0.12 |
Variables are presented as the median ± interquartile range. ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, PBW predicted body weight, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, Pplat, end-inspiratory plateau pressure, SAPS 2 Simplified Acute Severity Score 2, SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Vt tidal volume, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure
Multivariate analysis evaluating the factors associated with increase(s) in cisatracurium dosage
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| First model with PEEP at day 1 | |||
| Weight, per 1 kg increase | 1.14 | 0.98–1.31 | 0.07 |
| Bicarbonates, per 1 mmol/L | 1.06 | 0.87–1.29 | 0.56 |
| PEEP day 1, per 1 cm H2O increase | 0.42 | 0.18–0.98 | 0.044 |
| Severe ARDS | 0.22 | 0.017–2.89 | 0.25 |
| Use of prone position | 1.73 | 0.14–22.06 | 0.67 |
| Other organ failure, per organ | 6.02 | 0.68–53.1 | 0.10 |
| Second model with driving pressure at day 1 | |||
| Weight, per 1 kg increase | 1.07 | 0.99–1.16 | 0.065 |
| Bicarbonates, per 1 mmol/L | 1.06 | 0.87–1.29 | 0.58 |
| Driving pressure day 1, per 1 cm H2O increase | 1.99 | 1.01–3.9 | 0.045 |
| Severe ARDS | 0.32 | 0.017–6.02 | 0.44 |
| Use of prone position | 6.98 | 0.32–153.4 | 0.22 |
| Other organ failure, per organ | 1.96 | 0.35–10.85 | 0.44 |
ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure