Literature DB >> 11497139

The interpretation of train-of-four monitoring in intensive care: what about the muscle site and the current intensity?

F Lagneau1, L Benayoun, B Plaud, F Bonnet, J Favier, J Marty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of current intensity and choice of the stimulated muscle group on train-of-four (TOF) interpretation in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Intervention study in a surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: 13 ventilated patients requiring prolonged muscle relaxation. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Prior to blockade TOF responses of left and right orbicularis oculi, adductor pollicis, and plantar flexors were recorded by setting the current intensity at 20, 40, 60, and 80 mA. The minimal current intensity (MCI) providing a supramaximal response was then identified for each muscle. Cisatracurium was then infused aiming to continuously observe a TOF at 2/4 on the left orbicularis oculi at 40 mA. The responses to TOF on all the muscle sites were further recorded at 40, 60, and 80 mA when the endpoint was reached for the first time, and after a 48-h infusion. After cessation of infusion the delay to observe 4/4 responses at TOF was recorded at each site at 40 mA or at MCI if MCI was above 40 mA. MCI did not differ between muscle groups. When the fixed endpoint was reached for the first time on left orbicularis oculi, the TOF response at 40 mA on right orbicularis oculi differed significantly. In contrast, no difference was observed between left and right sides at 40 mA at the other sites, nor at any sites at 60 and 80 mA. The TOF response on orbicularis oculi (left and right sides together) was different at 40 mA, compared to 60 and 80 mA. TOF responses at orbicularis oculi at 60 or 80 mA significantly differed from responses on adductor pollicis or plantar flexor, orbicularis oculi being less sensitive to cisatracurium than adductor pollicis or plantar flexor. After a 48-h infusion the same differences in sensitivities were observed between the muscle groups. At any current intensity the recovery was slower at adductor pollicis than at orbicularis oculi or plantar flexor.
CONCLUSIONS: For a good TOF interpretation in the ICU the current intensity should be tested before onset of blockade. The orbicularis oculi is less sensitive to cisatracurium than adductor pollicis and plantar flexor both at onset and after a prolonged infusion. The recovery from relaxation is faster on orbicularis oculi and plantar flexor than on adductor pollicis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497139     DOI: 10.1007/s001340100964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  5 in total

1.  How to reduce cisatracurium consumption in ARDS patients: the TOF-ARDS study.

Authors:  Sami Hraiech; Jean-Marie Forel; Christophe Guervilly; Romain Rambaud; Samuel Lehingue; Mélanie Adda; Pierre Sylla; Sabine Valera; Julien Carvelli; Marc Gainnier; Laurent Papazian; Jérémy Bourenne
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 6.925

2.  Clinical assessment and train-of-four measurements in critically ill patients treated with recommended doses of cisatracurium or atracurium for neuromuscular blockade: a prospective descriptive study.

Authors:  Pierre Bouju; Jean-Marc Tadié; Nicolas Barbarot; Julien Letheulle; Fabrice Uhel; Pierre Fillatre; Guillaume Grillet; Angélique Goepp; Yves Le Tulzo; Arnaud Gacouin
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 3.  Neuromuscular blockade management in the critically Ill patient.

Authors:  J Ross Renew; Robert Ratzlaff; Vivian Hernandez-Torres; Sorin J Brull; Richard C Prielipp
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-05-24

Review 4.  Neuromuscular blockade in patients with ARDS: a rapid practice guideline.

Authors:  Waleed Alhazzani; E Belley-Cote; M H Møller; D C Angus; L Papazian; Y M Arabi; G Citerio; B Connolly; L Denehy; A Fox-Robichaud; C L Hough; J H Laake; F R Machado; M Ostermann; T Piraino; S Sharif; W Szczeklik; P J Young; A Gouskos; K Kiedrowski; K E A Burns
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of Train of Four Measurements with Kinemyography NMT DATEX and Accelerography TOFscan.

Authors:  Cyrus Motamed; Migena Demiri; Nora Colergrave
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.