| Literature DB >> 28770255 |
Tarvinder S Dhanjal1,2, Nicolas Lellouche2, Christopher J von Ruhland1, Guillaume Abehsira2, David H Edwards1,3, Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé2, Konstantinos Moschonas1, Emmanuel Teiger2, Alan J Williams1,3, Christopher H George1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study the authors determined the extent of cellular infiltration and dispersion, and regional vascularization in electrophysiologically (EP) defined zones in post-myocardial infarction (MI) swine ventricle.Entities:
Keywords: BZ, border zone; CI, critical isthmus; CM, cardiomyocytes; ECM, extracellular matrix; EP, electrophysiology; FB, fibroblasts; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LAD, left anterior descending; LAVA, local abnormal ventricular activity; MFB, myofibroblasts; MI, myocardial infarction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; VT; VT, ventricular tachycardia; Vim, vimentin; border zone; cTnT, cardiac troponin T; critical isthmus; iVT, inducible ventricular tachycardia; myocardial infarction; myofibroblasts; pig; vWF, von Willebrand factor; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770255 PMCID: PMC5527067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol ISSN: 2405-500X
Figure 1Electroanatomic Histological Overlay
(A) Epicardial markers (a, b, c) were sutured at the corresponding location on the (B) 3-dimensional electroanatomic map to identify functionally distinct electrophysiologically defined zones (see Methods). Purple dots, late and/or local abnormal ventricular activity; black and green dots, poor and good pace maps with <11 of 12 and ≥11 of 12 electrocardiographic leads matching the ventricular tachycardia, respectively.
Characterization of Post-MI Myocardium in Inducible and Noninducible VT Hearts
| Inducible VT (n = 6) | Noninducible VT (n = 6) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CARTO points | 393 ± 50 | 454 ± 112 | 0.34 |
| LV mass (g) | 145 ± 14 | 146 ± 3 | 0.87 |
| Voltage area bipolar <2 mV (cm2) | 26 ± 4 | 27 ± 12 | 0.52 |
| Voltage area bipolar <1 mV (cm2) | 10 ± 1 | 16 ± 7 | 0.005 |
| Border zone area (cm2) | 17 ± 3 | 11 ± 5 | 0.055 |
| Border zone area (% scar) | 64 ± 2 | 41 ± 3 | 0.004 |
Values are mean ± SE.
LV = left ventricular; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Significant difference between groups.
Figure 2Histological Assessments of Zones 1 to 4 in Post–Myocardial Infarction Ventricles
Ventricular sections were stained for cardiomyocytes (CM) (cardiac troponin T–positive) (brown; left panels), myofibroblasts (MFB) (α-smooth muscle actin–positive/von Willebrand factor–negative [α-SMA+/vWF−) (red), and endothelium and/or blood vessels (α-SMA+/vWF+) (co-incident red and black; middle panels), and fibroblasts (FB) (α-SMA−/vimentin-positive) (black; right panels). Light green and picromethylblue were used to visualize cellularity and connective tissue and/or the extracellular matrix, respectively (Online Appendix). Boxes outlined in white (0.15 mm2) are magnified in the middle and right panels. iVT = inducible ventricular tachycardia; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Figure 3Zonal Analysis of Cellularity and Vascularization in iVT and Non-VT Hearts
(A) The relative proportion of MFB, FB, and vessels in zones 1 to 4 in iVT and non-VT hearts. The diameter of the circle is directly proportional to the cumulative number of cells per square millimeter. Because CM were analyzed using a different method (percentage of area coverage), these data are omitted here. Quantification of (B) CM, (C) blood vessels, (D) FB, and (E) MFB in zones 1 to 4 in iVT (black) and non-VT (gray) hearts. *p < 0.05. Data are from 5 and 4 iVT and non-VT hearts, respectively (4 to 7 sections for each zone per heart). All parameters in zones 1 to 3 are significantly different from normal myocardium (zone 4) in iVT and non-VT hearts, and from hearts from sham-operated control pigs (p < 0.05). Sham data are from 2 pigs (8 to 10 sections for each zone per pig). ND = not determined due to the absence of zone 2 in non-VT hearts; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 4Cellular Distribution and MFB Alignment Does Not Correlate With VT Inducibility
(A) The spatial distribution of CM, MFB, FB, and blood vessels in zones 2 and 3 in iVT hearts and zone 3 in non-VT hearts was calculated (Online Figure 3). iVT (n = 5) and non-VT hearts (n = 4) and data are from the following number of sections: zone 2 iVT (29), zone 3 iVT (27), and zone 3 nonVT (23). *p < 0.05. (B) Conduits of directionally oriented MFB (arrow) in representative sections of zone 2 (iVT) and zone 3 (iVT and non-VT). (C) Relative axial alignment of MFB. Number of experiments is given in (A). ECM = extracelluar matrix; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 5Late/LAVA Potentials Exhibit Cellular Profile Intermediate Between CI and BZ Regions
(A) Substrate map of late and/or LAVA sites (pink dots) located within the superior aspect of the border zone (BZ). (B) The corresponding surface electrocardiographic leads (I, II and III) in sinus rhythm and local bipolar electrograms at 3 of these LAVA sites (left, middle, right panels). Arrows indicate late and/or LAVA potentials. Analysis of the abundances of (C) CM, (D) blood vessels, (E) MFB, and (F) FB in late and/or LAVA potential sites compared with zones 2 (VT critical isthmus [CI]) and 3 (BZ regions with poor pace map) in iVT hearts (data from Figure 3B to 3E). Seventeen sections obtained from 3 iVT hearts (pigs 4, 11, and 16) were analyzed. The single incidence of late and/or LAVA potentials in a non-VT heart (pig 6) was not analyzed. *p < 0.05. Abbreviations as Figures 1 and 2.