| Literature DB >> 28768517 |
Marie-Pierre Jolly1, Jennifer H Jordan2, Giselle C Meléndez2,3, Gary R McNeal4, Ralph B D'Agostino5, W Gregory Hundley6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with cancer receiving potentially cardio-toxic chemotherapy, measurements of left ventricular (LV) circumferential or longitudinal strain are often used clinically to identify myocardial dysfunction. Using a new software algorithm, we sought to determine in individuals receiving treatment for cancer the association between automated assessments of LV mean mid-wall circumferential strain and conventional measures of LV ejection fraction (EF) both obtained from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine balanced steady-state free-precession (bSSFP) white-blood acquisitions.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer therapy cardiotoxicity; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Chemotherapy; Strain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28768517 PMCID: PMC5541737 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0373-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Automatic algorithm to segment the LV blood pool cavity and myocardium. Each box shows a step in the algorithm. 1) Detection of the blood pool as the bright moving object. 2) Detection of the mitral valve anchor points in the long axis images and fitting of the mitral valve base plane over time. 3) Registration of neighboring frames to establish deformation fields between the first frame and any other frame in the time series. 4) Histogram analysis to determine the major regions in the image, namely, blood, myocardium, and lungs. 5) Shortest path algorithm to recover a contour, endocardium or epicardium in polar space
Fig. 2Description of the automatic process to calculate left ventricular (LV) volume and strain. As shown, a) the LV endocardium and epicardium are automatically contoured on the LV short axis slices. The mitral valve base plane is detected on the long axis slices of the left ventricle and projected onto the LV short axis slices. b To calculate the LV volumes, slices are stacked and contoured areas are summed up. At the same time, the mitral valve base plane is intersected with the stack of slices to remove portions of the volume that are above the base plane and inside the left atrium
Fig. 3Mid-ventricular mid-myocardial circumferential strain calculations: These panels display a) images over time with contours; b) images over time with strain on mid-myocardial pixels; c) average values of the circumferential strain for the images; and d) the average mid-ventricular mid-myocardial circumferential strain over the 60 frames of the cardiac cycle
Participant demographics
| Subjects ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53.8 ± 14.2 | |
| Men | 24 (33%) | |
| Hypertension | 26 (36%) | |
| Diabetes | 11 (15%) | |
| CAD | 4 (6%) | |
| Smoker | 8 (11%) | |
| Cancer Type | Breast | 28 (39%) |
| Lymphoma | 35 (49%) | |
| Sarcoma | 9 (12%) | |
| Chemotherapy type | Anthracycline | 49 (68%) |
| Antimicrotubule agents | 48 (67%) | |
| Alkylating agents | 56 (78%) | |
| Tyrasine-Kinase inhibitors | 28 (39%) | |
| Antimetabolites | 4 (6%) | |
| Receipt of cardio-protective medications | 24 (33%) | |
Changes in CMR metrics between the baseline and 3-month visit
| Baseline Pre-Chemotherapy | 3 Months After Chemotherapy | Change ( | Pearson correlation from difference in strain ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDV (ml) | 130.22 ± 37.7 | 124.0 ± 37.3 | −6.26 (0.024) | −0.34 (0.004) |
| ESV (ml) | 46.54 ± 20.03 | 48.18 ± 20.93 | 1.63 (0.25) | 0.09 (0.44) |
| EF (%) | 65.11 ± 6.57 | 62.11 ± 7.02 | −3.00 (0.0002) | −0.49 (<0.0001) |
| Strain | −18.81 ± 2.89 | −17.58 ± 3.08 | 1.23 (0.001) |
Abbreviations: EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EF ejection fraction
Pearson correlation coefficients, number of observations, and significance of association (p-values) for measures of left ventricular cine derived strain, tagged derived strain, and ejection fraction
| R ( | Cine derived strain | Tagged derived strain | Ejection fraction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cine derived strain | 1.0 (144) | 0.23 (125, 0.01) | −0.61 (144, <0.0001) |
| Tagged derived strain | 0.23 (125, 0.01) | 1.0 (125) | −0.09 (125, 0.30) |
| LVEF | −0.61 (144, <0.0001) | −0.09 (125, 0.30) | 1.0 (144) |
Fig. 4Correlation between 3-month change in strain and 3-month change in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (x-axis) versus the change in LV strain on the y-axis; each point represents data from 1 participant. The regression line and correlation are shown
Frequency of increase or decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and mean mid-wall circumferential strain derived from cine white blood images
| Frequency (percent) | Strain absolute increase | Strain absolute decrease | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEF decrease | 9 (12.5%) | 39 (54.2%) | Fisher’s Exact Test |
| LVEF increase | 12 (16.67%) | 12 (16.67%) |
|
Abbreviations: LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction
Pearson correlation coefficients, number of observations, and significance of association (p-values) for measures of LV cine derived strain and LVEF to age, changes in MLHFQ, change in troponin, and anthracycline dose
| R | Age | Change inMLHFQ | Change in troponin | Anthracycline Dose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in cine derived strain | 0.127 | −0.058 | −0.017 | 0.010 |
| Change in LVEF | −0.204 | −0.070 | 0.012 | −0.295 |
Abbreviations: MLHFQ Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
t-test associations between change in cine derived strain and change in ejection fraction compared to gender and risk factors
| Mean in each group | Gender | Hypertension | Diabetes | Coronary artery disease | Smoking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in cine derived strain | M: 1.21 | Yes: 1.10 | Yes: 1.11 | Yes: 1.34 | Yes: 1.63 |
| Change in ejection fraction | M: −3.97 | Yes: −3.16 | Yes: −3.35 | Yes: −10.3 | Yes: −4.04 |