Literature DB >> 20419590

Offside decision making of assistant referees in the English Premier League: impact of physical and perceptual-cognitive factors on match performance.

Peter Catteeuw1, Bart Gilis, Johan Wagemans, Werner Helsen.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the accuracy of offside judgements of assistant referees in the English Premier League. The moment in the match, the position and movement speed of the assistant referee, attacker and second-last defender, together with the angle of view for the assistant referee were all considered to underlie incorrect decisions. The error rate was 17.5% (868 of 4960 situations). As the English assistant referees tended not to signal in doubtful situations (c = 0.91), there was an overall bias towards non-flag errors (773 non-flag errors vs. 95 flag errors). The flash-lag hypothesis could explain all flag errors, whereas the optical-error hypothesis could explain a proportion of the non-flag errors (45.4%). Fatigue, movement speed, and angle of view did not have a detrimental effect on offside decision making. In conclusion, there were fewer flag errors than in the 2002 and 2006 FIFA World Cups, whereas the number of non-flag errors rose. The increased awareness of factors involved in offside decision making and the instructions to give the benefit of the doubt to attackers could have contributed to this situation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419590     DOI: 10.1080/02640410903518184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

1.  Hydration: The New FIFA World Cup's Challenge for Referee Decision Making?

Authors:  Mohamed Houssein; Philippe Lopes; Bruno Fagnoni; Said Ahmaidi; Soubère Mahamoud Yonis; Pierre-Marie Leprêtre
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Football officials activities during matches: a comparison of activity of referees and linesmen in European, Premiership and Championship matches.

Authors:  Valter Di Salvo; Michael R Carmont; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 3.  Physical Load and Referees' Decision-Making in Sports Games: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Bloß; Jörg Schorer; Florian Loffing; Dirk Büsch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer).

Authors:  Frowin Fasold; Peter Wühr; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Evaluating erroneous offside calls in soccer.

Authors:  Stefanie Hüttermann; Benjamin Noël; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Running Performance and Position is Not Related to Decision-Making Accuracy in Referees.

Authors:  Amund Riiser; Vidar Andersen; Atle Sæterbakken; Einar Ylvisaker; Vegard Fusche Moe
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2019-08-16

7.  Match Analysis of Soccer Refereeing Using Spatiotemporal Data: A Case Study.

Authors:  Bruno Gonçalves; Diogo Coutinho; Bruno Travassos; João Brito; Pedro Figueiredo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Influence of Football Match-Play on Isometric Knee Flexion Strength and Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion in Football Referees and Assistant Referees.

Authors:  Vicente Fernández-Ruiz; Álvaro López-Samanes; Juan Del Coso; José Pino-Ortega; Javier Sánchez-Sánchez; Pablo Terrón-Manrique; Marco Beato; Víctor Moreno-Pérez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Soccer Offside Judgments in Laypersons with Different Types of Static Displays.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Frowin Fasold; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The elements of executive attention in top soccer referees and assistant referees.

Authors:  Przemysław Pietraszewski; Robert Roczniok; Anna Maszczyk; Paweł Grycmann; Tomasz Roleder; Arkadiusz Stanula; Olga Fidos-Czuba; Marcin Ponczek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.193

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.