Literature DB >> 28766019

A retrospective imaging study of surgical outcomes and range of motion in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Shunsuke Kanbara1, Shiro Imagama2, Keigo Ito3, Kenyu Ito1, Naoki Ishiguro1, Fumihiko Kato3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The K line was introduced in a previous study, but did not include the cervical range of motion (ROM) as a parameter for evaluating surgical outcomes for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and few reports have used both the K line and X-ray evaluations of the cervical ROM to describe the surgical outcomes in such patients.
METHODS: Double-door C2-C7 or C3-C7 laminoplasty was performed in 100 patients with cervical OPLL who were classified according to the K line [86 patients, K line (+) and 14 patients, K line (-)]. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate recovery rates. Preoperative and postoperative C2-C7 lordotic angles were measured using the Cobb method. In addition, preoperative and postoperative sagittal alignments in flexion and extension were studied, and the flexion values were calculated by subtracting the preoperative and postoperative flexion ROM from extension ROM.
RESULTS: The mean JOA scores recovery rate were 57.3% in the K line (+) and 37.7% in the K line (-) groups (p < 0.05), and the respective corresponding mean postoperative C2-C7 lordotic angles were 9.1° and -3.4° (p < 0.001). In the K line (+) group, the JOA score recovery rate for a postoperative flexion value >0 was significantly lower than that for a postoperative flexion value ≤0 (p < 0.01), and the mean JOA score recovery rate worsened with an increased signal intensity on 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: K line (+) patients exhibited sufficient neurological improvement after laminoplasty. However, even patients in this group had a low JOA score recovery rate if the postoperative flexion value was >0 and the 1-year postoperative increased signal intensity grade was 2 or 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexion value; K line; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL); Range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766019     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5246-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in dural sac and spinal cord cross-sectional area in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: cervical spine.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Makondo Mochizuki; Hiroaki Konishi; Atsuomi Aiba; Ryo Kadota; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Chikato Mannoji; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Toshikazu Tani; Takahiro Ushida; Kenji Ishida; Hiroyuki Iai; Takamasa Noguchi; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Trauma-induced myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Takashi Sakou; Kyoji Hayashi; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Masataka Hirotsu; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study.

Authors:  S Imagama; Y Matsuyama; Y Yukawa; N Kawakami; M Kamiya; T Kanemura; N Ishiguro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

6.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Liu; Yu Chen; Haisong Yang; Tiefeng Li; Bin Xu; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yutaka Masaki; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Masaaki Aramomi; Mitsuhiro Hashimoto; Masao Koda; Makondo Mochizuki; Hideshige Moriya
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-02

8.  Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Yang-Jin Lim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  K-line (-) in the Neck-Flexed Position in Patients With Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Is a Risk Factor for Poor Clinical Outcome After Cervical Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo; Taito Itabashi; Shunfu Chin; Kan-Ichiro Wada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Static versus dynamic factors for the development of myelopathy in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Junko Kawabe; Koichi Hayashi; Tomonori Endo; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modified K-line for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Approach in Patients with K-line (-) OPLL.

Authors:  Xizhe Liu; Bizhi Tan; Bin Xiao; Xuenong Zou; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.