Literature DB >> 17285045

An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.

Yutaka Masaki1, Masashi Yamazaki, Akihiko Okawa, Masaaki Aramomi, Mitsuhiro Hashimoto, Masao Koda, Makondo Mochizuki, Hideshige Moriya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical outcome of anterior decompression with spinal fusion (ASF) with the surgical outcome of laminoplasty for patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
METHODS: The study group comprised 19 ASF patients (A-group) and 40 laminoplasty patients (P-group) treated from 1993 to 2002 with 1 year or longer follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system was used to evaluate cervical myelopathy, and the recovery rate calculated 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean recovery rate was 68.4% in the A-group and 52.5% in the P-group (P<0.05). Fifteen patients had a recovery rate less than 40%: 2 in the A-group and 13 in the P-group. One P-group patient and none of the A-group patients developed postoperative aggravation of their neurologic status. The P-group was divided into 2 subgroups: a good outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was 40% or higher (n=27) and a poor outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was less than 40% (n=13). The mean age at surgery was 59.9 years in the good outcome group and 68.0 years in the poor outcome group (P<0.05). The mean range of intervertebral mobility at maximum cord compression level before surgery was 6.9 degrees in the good outcome group and 10 degrees in the poor outcome group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that the surgical outcome of ASF was superior to the surgical outcome of laminoplasty. Elderly patients treated with laminoplasty showed an especially poor surgical outcome. We suggest that hypermobility of vertebrae at the cord compression level is a risk factor for poor surgical outcome after laminoplasty. Based on these results, we recommend that ASF should be the first choice of treatment for patients with significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and a hypermobile cervical spine. When laminoplasty is used for such cases, the addition of posterior instrumented fusion would be desirable for stabilizing the spine and decreasing damage to the spinal cord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285045     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211260.28497.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  50 in total

1.  Neuroprotective therapy using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy, Part 1: a phase I and IIa clinical trial.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Hiroshi Takahashi; Kei Kato; Mitsuhiro Hashimoto; Koichi Hayashi; Takeo Furuya; Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Junko Kawabe; Chikato Mannoji; Ryo Kadota; Masayuki Hashimoto; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masao Koda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: factors affecting the effect of posterior decompression.

Authors:  Norihiro Nishida; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yoshihiko Kato; Yasuaki Imajo; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Junji Ohgi; Xian Chen; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  A review of prognostic factors for surgical outcome of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine.

Authors:  Hai Li; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Anterior surgery in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine: technical note.

Authors:  Xinwei Wang; Deyu Chen; Wen Yuan; Ying Zhang; Jianru Xiao; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

6.  Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Yu-Sheng Huang; Jian-Ting Chen; Zhao-Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Biomechanical analysis of the influence of static and dynamic factors.

Authors:  Norihiro Nishida; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yoshihiko Kato; Yasuaki Imajo; Yuichiro Yoshida; Syunichi Kawano; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuzhou Liu; Shaoxiong Min; Hui Zhang; Zhilai Zhou; Hehui Wang; Anmin Jin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Axonal damage is remarkable in patients with acutely worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy: biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid samples.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takahashi; Yasuchika Aoki; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Fumiaki Terajima; Masahiko Saito; Takuya Miyamoto; Keita Koyama; Keiichiro Yamamoto; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Seiji Ohtori; Masashi Yamazaki; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.