Literature DB >> 17978640

Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.

Kyung-Soo Suk1, Ki-Tack Kim, Jung-Hee Lee, Sang-Hun Lee, Yang-Jin Lim, Jin-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of laminoplasty on range of motion (ROM) and sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical laminoplasty is an effective procedure decompressing multilevel spinal cord compression. Preoperative lordosis of the cervical spine is a prerequisite for laminoplasty, and maintaining postoperative lordosis is also important for decompression of the spinal cord.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients who planned open door laminoplasty from C3-C7 were studied. Preoperative diagnosis included myelopathy cases associated with cervical spondylosis in 52, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in 29, and multilevel disc herniation in 4 cases. Cervical spine lateral radiography in neutral, flexion, and extension were taken before surgery and at 2-year follow-up. The cervical lordosis or kyphosis was measured by the Cobb's method. Diagnosis, degree of preoperative lordosis in the neutral position, and degree of preoperative sagittal alignment in flexion and extension were studied as risk factors for postoperative kyphosis.
RESULTS: ROM was decreased 30.5% after laminoplasty. The mean preoperative lordosis in the neutral position was 16.2 degrees and postoperative lordosis was 11.4 degrees. Kyphosis (mean, 12.2 degrees) was observed in 9 patients (10.6%) after surgery. All of them had been diagnosed as myelopathy cases associated with cervical spondylosis. The preoperative lordotic angle was significantly smaller in the kyphotic group than in the lordotic group. In the kyphotic group, preoperative flexion was 10.2 degrees larger and extension was 10.3 degrees smaller than in the lordotic group. The kyphotic group showed 19.3 degrees of kyphosis in flexion and 8.7 degrees of lordosis in extension before surgery.
CONCLUSION: ROM of the cervical spine decreased by 30.5% after laminoplasty. Kyphosis was developed in 10.6% of the patients. The preoperative factors affecting postoperative kyphosis are diagnosis of myelopathy cases associated with cervical spondylosis, a lordosis angle of <10 degrees, and a kyphotic angle during flexion that is larger than a lordotic angle during extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17978640     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158c573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Stavroula Pagkrati; Danilo Leonetti; Maria Teresa Miscione; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Impact of deep extensor muscle-preserving approach on clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Ken Nagahama; Akira Iwata; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Impact of the surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy on the preoperative cervical sagittal balance: a review of prospective comparative cohort between anterior decompression with fusion and laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kenichiro Sakai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Yoshiyasu Arai; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of cervical lordosis loss after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Jia Qi Li; Rui Jie Niu; Zhao Liu; Tong Tong; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Liu; Yu Chen; Haisong Yang; Tiefeng Li; Bin Xu; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Morio Matsumoto; Daisuke Ichihara; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hirokazu Fujiwara; Suketaka Momoshima; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Ogawa; Masahiko Watanabe; Takeshi Takahata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: impact on cervical spine function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Shigeki Ohshima; Yoshihiro Hojo; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Regression of Disc-Osteophyte Complexes Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Adedayo A Ashana; Akshay Sharma; William Sheppard; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

9.  A retrospective imaging study of surgical outcomes and range of motion in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kanbara; Shiro Imagama; Keigo Ito; Kenyu Ito; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Reoperation Rates Following Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty.

Authors:  John A Rodriguez-Feo; Daniel Leas; Susan M Odum; Marc Angerame; Mark Kurd; Bruce V Darden; R Alden Milam
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.