Literature DB >> 11255420

Physical activity and coronary heart disease in women: is "no pain, no gain" passé?

I M Lee1, K M Rexrode, N R Cook, J E Manson, J E Buring.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Physically active women have lower coronary heart disease (CHD) rates than inactive women. However, whether the association differs by intensity of activity or in women at high risk for CHD is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between physical activity, specifically investigating walking (a light-to-moderate activity depending on pace), and CHD among women, including those at high risk for CHD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study of 39 372 healthy female health professionals aged 45 years or older, enrolled throughout the United States between September 1992 and May 1995, with follow-up to March 1999. Recreational activities, including walking and stair climbing, were reported at study entry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation of CHD with energy expended on all activities, vigorous activities, and walking.
RESULTS: A total of 244 cases of CHD occurred. Adjusting for potential confounders, the relative risks (RRs) of CHD for less than 200, 200-599, 600-1499, and 1500 or more kcal/wk expended on all activities were 1.00 (referent), 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.12), 0.55 (95% CI, 0.37-0.82), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.50-1.12), respectively (P for linear trend =.03). Vigorous activities were associated with lower risk (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.38-1.04 comparing highest and lowest categories). Walking also predicted lower risk among women without vigorous activities. Among these women, the multivariate RRs for walking 1 to 59 min/wk, 1.0 to 1.5 h/wk, and 2 or more h/wk, compared with no regular walking, were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.57-1.29), 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.86), and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29-0.78), respectively. For walking paces of less than 3.2 km/h (2.0 mph), 3.2 to 4.7 km/h (2.0-2.9 mph), and 4.8 km/h (3.0 mph) or more, compared with no regular walking, RRs were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.32-0.97), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.47-1.05), and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30-0.90), respectively. When analyzed simultaneously, time spent walking (P for linear trend =.01) but not walking pace (P for linear trend =.55) predicted lower risk. The inverse association between physical activity and CHD risk did not differ by weight or cholesterol levels (P for interaction =.95 and.71, respectively), but there were significant interactions by smoking and hypertension status. Physical activity was inversely related to risk in current smokers but not hypertensive women (P for interaction =.01 and.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that even light-to-moderate activity is associated with lower CHD rates in women. At least 1 hour of walking per week predicted lower risk. The inverse association with physical activity was also present in women at high risk for CHD, including those who were overweight, had increased cholesterol levels, or were smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11255420     DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.11.1447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  105 in total

Review 1.  Exercise prescription for the elderly: current recommendations.

Authors:  R S Mazzeo; H Tanaka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults.

Authors:  Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Urban residential environments and senior citizens' longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces.

Authors:  T Takano; K Nakamura; M Watanabe
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  No pain, no gain? Thoughts on the Caerphilly study.

Authors:  I-M Lee
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data.

Authors:  John Pucher; Ralph Buehler; David R Bassett; Andrew L Dannenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Physical activity of moderate intensity in leisure time and the risk of all cause mortality.

Authors:  J Bucksch
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Comparison of lifestyle-based and traditional cardiovascular disease prediction in a multiethnic cohort of nonsmoking women.

Authors:  Nina P Paynter; Michael J LaMonte; JoAnn E Manson; Lisa W Martin; Lawrence S Phillips; Paul M Ridker; Jennifer G Robinson; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and exercise training in primary and secondary coronary prevention.

Authors:  Damon L Swift; Carl J Lavie; Neil M Johannsen; Ross Arena; Conrad P Earnest; James H O'Keefe; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair; Timothy S Church
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Relationship between Physical Inactivity and Long-term Outcome in Patients Aged≥80 Years with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Shijun Li; Salim Barywani; Michael Fu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

10.  Body mass index, physical activity, and the risk of decline in overall health and physical functioning in late middle age.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Z He; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.