Literature DB >> 28764555

Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.

Jun Yin1, Xavier Paoletti2, Daniel J Sargent1, Sumithra J Mandrekar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase I trials are designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose of therapeutic agents for subsequent testing. The dose-finding paradigm has thus traditionally focused on identifying the maximum tolerable dose of an agent or combination therapy under the assumption that there is a non-decreasing relationship between dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle. A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile, was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades experienced in the first cycle. More recently, this was extended to a repeated measures design based on the total toxicity profile to account for longitudinal toxicities over multiple treatment cycles in the absence of within-patient correlation.
METHODS: In this work, we propose to extend the design in the presence of within-patient correlation. Furthermore, we provide a framework to detect a toxicity time trend (toxicity increasing, decreasing, or stable) over multiple treatment cycles. We utilize a linear mixed model in the Bayesian framework, with the addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment.
RESULTS: The performance of this design was evaluated using simulation studies and real data from a phase I trial. We demonstrated that using available toxicity data from all cycles of treatment improves the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose identification and allows for the detection of a time trend. The performance is consistent regardless of the strength of the within-patient correlation. In addition, the use of a quasi-continuous total toxicity profile score significantly increased the power to detect time trends compared to when binary data only were used.
CONCLUSION: The increased interest in molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies in oncology necessitates innovative phase I study designs. Our proposed framework provides a tool to tackle some of the challenges presented by these novel agents, specifically through the ability to understand patterns of toxicity over time, which is important in the cases of cumulative or late toxicities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-finding; adaptive; continual reassessment method; correlated toxicity; immunotherapy; maximum tolerated dose; molecularly targeted agents; phase I clinical trials; repeated measures; time trend

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28764555      PMCID: PMC5714674          DOI: 10.1177/1740774517723829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  33 in total

1.  Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes.

Authors:  Xavier Paoletti; Adélaïde Doussau; Monia Ezzalfani; Elisa Rizzo; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates.

Authors:  Julie R Brahmer; Charles G Drake; Ira Wollner; John D Powderly; Joel Picus; William H Sharfman; Elizabeth Stankevich; Alice Pons; Theresa M Salay; Tracee L McMiller; Marta M Gilson; Changyu Wang; Mark Selby; Janis M Taube; Robert Anders; Lieping Chen; Alan J Korman; Drew M Pardoll; Israel Lowy; Suzanne L Topalian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Challenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies.

Authors:  S Postel-Vinay; S Aspeslagh; E Lanoy; C Robert; J-C Soria; A Marabelle
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Phase I/II trial of tremelimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Luis H Camacho; Scott Antonia; Jeffrey Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Thomas F Gajewski; Bruce Redman; Dmitri Pavlov; Cecile Bulanhagui; Viviana A Bozon; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Steven O'Day; Walter Urba; John Powderly; Geoff Nichol; Michael Yellin; Jolie Snively; Evan Hersh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti; Elisa Rizzo; Christophe Massard; David Olmos; Camilla Fowst; Bernard Levy; Pierre Mancini; Denis Lacombe; Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Christophe Le Tourneau; Lillian L Siu; Stan B Kaye; Jaap Verweij; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Treatment Adherence and Its Impact on Disease-Free Survival in the Breast International Group 1-98 Trial of Tamoxifen and Letrozole, Alone and in Sequence.

Authors:  Jacquie H Chirgwin; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Alan S Coates; Karen N Price; Bent Ejlertsen; Marc Debled; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Ian Smith; Manuela Rabaglio; John F Forbes; Patrick Neven; István Láng; Marco Colleoni; Beat Thürlimann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen; Qian Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Proportional odds assumption for modeling longitudinal ordinal multiple toxicity outcomes in dose finding studies of targeted agents: A pooled analysis of 54 studies.

Authors:  Damien Drubay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-01-25

3.  phase1RMD: An R package for repeated measures dose-finding designs with novel toxicity and efficacy endpoints.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Yu Du; Rui Qin; Shihao Shen; Sumithra Mandrekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.