Literature DB >> 24533174

Should the mechanical index be revised for ARFI imaging?

Charles C Church1, Cecille Labuda1, Kathryn Nightingale2.   

Abstract

The mechanical index (MI) quantifies the likelihood that exposure to diagnostic ultrasound will produce an adverse biological effect by a nonthermal mechanism. The current formulation of the MI is based on inertial cavitation thresholds in two liquids, water and blood, as calculated by a formalism assuming very short pulse durations. Although tissue contains a high proportion of water, it is not a liquid but a viscoelastic solid. Further, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging employs high-intensity pulses up to several hundred acoustic periods long. The effect of these differences was studied in water, blood and five representative tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARFI; Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging; MI; bioeffects; inertial cavitation; mechanical index

Year:  2012        PMID: 24533174      PMCID: PMC3924964          DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp        ISSN: 1948-5719


  7 in total

1.  Acoustic output upper limits proposition: should upper limits be retained?

Authors:  William D O'Brien; John G Abbott; Mel E Stratmeyer; Gerald R Harris; Mark E Schafer; Tariq A Siddiqi; Christopher R B Merritt; Francis A Duck; Phillip J Bendick
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R E Apfel; C K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue.

Authors:  Xinmai Yang; Charles C Church
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A simple viscoelastic model for soft tissues in the frequency range 6-20 MHz.

Authors:  Xinmai Yang; Charles C Church
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  New sonographic techniques for harmonic imaging--underlying physical principles.

Authors:  Christian Kollmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound: executive summary.

Authors:  J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Ultrasonic shear wave properties of soft tissues and tissuelike materials.

Authors:  E L Madsen; H J Sathoff; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Quantifying Image Quality Improvement Using Elevated Acoustic Output in B-Mode Harmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Gregg E Trahey; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Analyzing the Impact of Increasing Mechanical Index and Energy Deposition on Shear Wave Speed Reconstruction in Human Liver.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Manal F Abdelmalek; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.998

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.