David M Buchner1, Eileen Rillamas-Sun2, Chongzhi Di2, Michael J LaMonte3, Stephen W Marshall4, Julie Hunt2, Yuzheng Zhang2, Dori E Rosenberg5, I-Min Lee6, Kelly R Evenson4, Amy H Herring7, Cora E Lewis8, Marcia L Stefanick9, Andrea Z LaCroix10. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois. 2. Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo of The State University New York, Buffalo, New York. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Kaiser Permanente Washinton Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. 6. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 8. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 9. Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 10. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) measured using accelerometry is associated with incident falls and whether associations differ according to physical function or history of falls. DESIGN: Prospective study with baseline data collection from 2012 to 2014 and 1 year of follow-up. SETTING: Women's Health Initiative participants living in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory women aged 63 to 99 (N = 5,545). MEASUREMENTS: Minutes of MVPA per day measured using an accelerometer, functional status measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), fall risk factors assessed using a questionnaire, fall injuries assessed in a telephone interview, incident falls ascertained from fall calendars. RESULTS: Incident rate ratios (IRRs) revealed greater fall risk in women in the lowest quartile of MVPA compared to those in the highest (IRR = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.38), adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and fall risk factors. Fall rates were not significantly associated with MVPA in women with high SPPB scores (9-12) or one or fewer falls in the previous year, but in women with low SPPB scores (≤ 8) or a history of frequent falls, fall rates were higher in women with lower MVPA levels than in those with higher levels (interaction P < .03 and < .001, respectively). Falls in women with MVPA above the median were less likely to involve injuries requiring medical treatment (9.9%) than falls in women with lower MVPA levels (13.0%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that falls are not more common or injurious in older women who engage in higher levels of MVPA. These findings support encouraging women to engage in the amounts and types of MVPA that they prefer. Older women with low physical function or frequent falls with low levels of MVPA are a high-risk group for whom vigilance about falls prevention is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) measured using accelerometry is associated with incident falls and whether associations differ according to physical function or history of falls. DESIGN: Prospective study with baseline data collection from 2012 to 2014 and 1 year of follow-up. SETTING: Women's Health Initiative participants living in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory women aged 63 to 99 (N = 5,545). MEASUREMENTS: Minutes of MVPA per day measured using an accelerometer, functional status measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), fall risk factors assessed using a questionnaire, fall injuries assessed in a telephone interview, incident falls ascertained from fall calendars. RESULTS: Incident rate ratios (IRRs) revealed greater fall risk in women in the lowest quartile of MVPA compared to those in the highest (IRR = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.38), adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and fall risk factors. Fall rates were not significantly associated with MVPA in women with high SPPB scores (9-12) or one or fewer falls in the previous year, but in women with low SPPB scores (≤ 8) or a history of frequent falls, fall rates were higher in women with lower MVPA levels than in those with higher levels (interaction P < .03 and < .001, respectively). Falls in women with MVPA above the median were less likely to involve injuries requiring medical treatment (9.9%) than falls in women with lower MVPA levels (13.0%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that falls are not more common or injurious in older women who engage in higher levels of MVPA. These findings support encouraging women to engage in the amounts and types of MVPA that they prefer. Older women with low physical function or frequent falls with low levels of MVPA are a high-risk group for whom vigilance about falls prevention is warranted.
Authors: Katherine S Hall; Miriam C Morey; Chhanda Dutta; Todd M Manini; Arthur L Weltman; Miriam E Nelson; Amy L Morgan; Jane G Senior; Chris Seyffarth; David M Buchner Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Cynthia A Thomson; Robert B Wallace; Chunyuan Wu; Rebecca A Seguin; Scott B Going; Andrea LaCroix; Charles Eaton; Judith K Ockene; Michael J LaMonte; Rebecca Jackson; W Jerry Mysiw; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Lucy Yardley; Jolanda C M van Haastregt; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Nina Beyer; Klaus Hauer; Chris Todd Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Theodore K Courtney; Wen-Ruey Chang; David A Lombardi; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Melanye J Brennan; Melissa J Perry; Jeffrey N Katz; David C Christiani; Santosh K Verma Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: S Gawler; D A Skelton; S Dinan-Young; T Masud; R W Morris; M Griffin; D Kendrick; S Iliffe Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: William E Kraus; Kenneth E Powell; William L Haskell; Kathleen F Janz; Wayne W Campbell; John M Jakicic; Richard P Troiano; Kyle Sprow; Andrea Torres; Katrina L Piercy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Benjamin T Schumacher; John Bellettiere; Michael J LaMonte; Kelly R Evenson; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; David A Sleet; Charles B Eaton; Cora E Lewis; Karen L Margolis; Lesley F Tinker; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 2.109
Authors: Dori E Rosenberg; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; John Bellettiere; Michael LaMonte; David M Buchner; Chongzhi Di; Julie Hunt; Stephen Marshall; Marcia Stefanick; Yuzheng Zhang; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 5.562