Literature DB >> 28753700

A new composite measure of colonoscopy: the Performance Indicator of Colonic Intubation (PICI).

Roland M Valori1, Sarah Damery2, Daniel R Gavin3, John T Anderson4, Mark T Donnelly5, J Graham Williams6, Edwin T Swarbrick7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Cecal intubation rate (CIR) is an established performance indicator of colonoscopy. In some patients, cecal intubation with acceptable tolerance is only achieved with additional sedation. This study proposes a composite Performance Indicator of Colonic Intubation (PICI), which combines CIR, comfort, and sedation. METHODS : Data from 20 085 colonoscopies reported in the 2011 UK national audit were analyzed. PICI was defined as the percentage of procedures achieving cecal intubation with median dose (2 mg) of midazolam or less, and nurse-assessed comfort score of 1 - 3/5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated possible associations between PICI and patient, unit, colonoscopist, and diagnostic factors. RESULTS : PICI was achieved in 54.1 % of procedures. PICI identified factors affecting performance more frequently than single measures such as CIR and polyp detection, or CIR + comfort alone. Older age, male sex, adequate bowel preparation, and a positive fecal occult blood test as indication were associated with a higher PICI. Unit accreditation, the presence of magnetic imagers in the unit, greater annual volume, fewer years' experience, and higher training/trainer status were associated with higher PICI rates. Procedures in which PICI was achieved were associated with significantly higher polyp detection rates than when PICI was not achieved. CONCLUSIONS : PICI provides a simpler picture of performance of colonoscopic intubation than separate measures of CIR, comfort, and sedation. It is associated with more factors that are amenable to change that might improve performance and with higher likelihood of polyp detection. It is proposed that PICI becomes the key performance indicator for intubation of the colon in colonoscopy quality improvement initiatives. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28753700     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-115897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

Review 1.  British society of gastroenterology Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme (EQIP): overview and progress.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Sara Koo; John Anderson; Mark McAlindon; Andrew M Veitch; Allan John Morris; Pradeep Bhandari; James E East; George Webster; Kofi W Oppong; Ian D Penman
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-18

Review 2.  Training in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Neil D Hawkes; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09

3.  Monitoring of colonoscopy quality indicators in an academic endoscopy facility reveals adherence to international recommendations.

Authors:  Stefanos Karamaroudis; Aliki Stamou; Stamatia C Vorri; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Vasilios Papadopoulos; Georgios Tziatzios; Aikaterini Karagouni; Panagiota Katsouli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

4.  Impact of a national basic skills in colonoscopy course on trainee performance: An interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Keith Siau; James Hodson; John T Anderson; Roland Valori; Geoff Smith; Paul Hagan; Marietta Iacucci; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 - 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru.

Authors:  Julio F León Moreno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-11-07

6.  Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas E Burr; Edmund Derbyshire; John Taylor; Simon Whalley; Venkataraman Subramanian; Paul J Finan; Matthew D Rutter; Roland Valori; Eva J A Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-11-13

7.  Self-assessment of Competence in Endoscopy: Challenges and Insights.

Authors:  Michael A Scaffidi; Rishad Khan; Samir C Grover; Nikko Gimpaya; Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.