Literature DB >> 28752570

A preliminary comparison of two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography and pressure-volume loop analysis in patients with Fontan physiology: The role of ventricular morphology.

David Steflik1, Ryan J Butts2, George H Baker1, Varsha Bandisode1, Andrew Savage1, Andrew M Atz1, Shahryar M Chowdhury1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) may be a useful modality for assessing ventricular performance in patients with single ventricle physiology. However, STE's ability to accurately assess ventricular performance in this population is unknown. The objective of this study was to perform a preliminary comparison of STE measures of myocardial deformation to reference standard measures of function derived from pressure-volume loop (PVL) analysis.
DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study investigating PVLs in patients with Fontan physiology. PVLs were recorded using microconductance catheters. PVL indices included end-systolic elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), ventriculo-arterial coupling (Ea/Ees), and the isovolumic relaxation time constant (tau). Patients were included if they had an echocardiogram within 1 month of their catheterization. STE was performed retrospectively using vendor independent software.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients had echocardiograms available for analysis, 12 were right ventricular (RV) dominant. The median age was 8 years (IQR 5-17 years). Circumferential strain (r=-.72, P≤.01) and strain rate (r=-.61, P=.04) correlated with Ea/Ees in those with RV-dominant morphology. Longitudinal strain rate correlated with Ees in those with LV-dominant morphology (r=-.98, P≤.01). Longitudinal EDSR correlated with tau in those with LV-dominant morphology (r=-.90, P=.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In this limited sample, circumferential measures of deformation correlated with PVL measures better in patients with RV morphology, while longitudinal measures correlated better with PVL measures in patients with LV morphology. Further validation and investigation into the clinical usefulness of these measures are warranted.
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fontan; pressure-volume loop; speckle tracking echocardiography; ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28752570      PMCID: PMC5607109          DOI: 10.1111/echo.13641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  21 in total

1.  Single-beat estimation of end-systolic elastance using bilinearly approximated time-varying elastance curve.

Authors:  T Shishido; K Hayashi; K Shigemi; T Sato; M Sugimachi; K Sunagawa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantitative echocardiographic assessment of the performance of the functionally single right ventricle after the Fontan operation.

Authors:  W T Mahle; P D Coon; G Wernovsky; J Rychik
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.093

3.  Assessment of myocardial deformation in children using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data and vendor independent speckle tracking software.

Authors:  Laurens P Koopman; Cameron Slorach; Cedric Manlhiot; Brian W McCrindle; Edgar T Jaeggi; Luc Mertens; Mark K Friedberg
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Contraction pattern of the systemic right ventricle shift from longitudinal to circumferential shortening and absent global ventricular torsion.

Authors:  Eirik Pettersen; Thomas Helle-Valle; Thor Edvardsen; Harald Lindberg; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Bjarne Smevik; Otto A Smiseth; Kai Andersen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The influence of angle of insonation and target depth on speckle-tracking strain.

Authors:  Daniel Forsha; Niels Risum; Sudarshan Rajagopal; Stephen Dolgner; Christoph Hornik; Huiman Barnhart; Joseph Kisslo; Piers Barker
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Interpreting measurements of cardiac function using vendor-independent speckle tracking echocardiography in children: a prospective, blinded comparison with catheter-derived measurements.

Authors:  Suma P Goudar; G Hamilton Baker; Shahryar M Chowdhury; Kimberly J Reid; Girish Shirali; Mark A Scheurer
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Echocardiographic evaluation before bidirectional Glenn operation in functional single-ventricle heart disease: comparison to catheter angiography.

Authors:  Kenan W D Stern; Doff B McElhinney; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Tal Geva; David W Brown
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Factors influencing early and late outcome following the Fontan procedure in the current era. The 'Two Commandments'?

Authors:  Riad B M Hosein; Andrew J B Clarke; Simon P McGuirk; Massimo Griselli; Oliver Stumper; Joseph V De Giovanni; David J Barron; William J Brawn
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Effect of Sildenafil on Pressure-Volume Loop Measures of Ventricular Function in Fontan Patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Butts; Shahryar M Chowdhury; George H Baker; Varsha Bandisode; Andrew J Savage; Andrew M Atz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Left ventricular function and functional recovery early and late after myocardial infarction: a prospective pilot study comparing two-dimensional strain, conventional echocardiography, and radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shemy Carasso; Yoram Agmon; Ariel Roguin; Zohar Keidar; Ora Israel; Haim Hammerman; Jonathan Lessick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Children.

Authors:  Bibhuti Das; Shriprasad Deshpande; Jyothsna Akam-Venkata; Divya Shakti; William Moskowitz; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 1.838

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.