BACKGROUND: Adult studies demonstrate that echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function using speckle tracking correlate with invasive measurements, but such data in the pediatric population are sparse. Our aim was to compare speckle-derived measures of cardiac function to measurements routinely obtained by cardiac catheterization in children. METHODS: Echocardiograms were performed on the day of cardiac catheterization. Using Tomtec 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis, longitudinal strain (LS), longitudinal strain rate (LSR), early diastolic LSR, and ejection fraction (EF) for the right and left ventricle (RV and LV) were calculated via speckle tracking. Global LS and LSR were calculated for the LV. These results were compared to cardiac index, maximum ventricular dp/dt (max dp/dt), ventricular end-diastolic pressure (EDP), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) obtained by fluid-filled catheters. A blinded observer performed all echo measurements. RESULTS: Fifty studies were performed on 28 patients ages 4 months to 20 years old. Their diagnoses included cardiac transplant (48 studies), repaired AV septal defect (1), and dilated cardiomyopathy (1). RVEDP ranged from 2 to 22 mm Hg (median=6) and PCWP ranged from 6 to 32 mmHg (median 10). LV global LS and LV 2-chamber LSR by speckle-tracking negatively correlated with LV max dp/dt (LV global LS R=-.83, P=.001; LV 2-chamber LSR R=-.69, P=.009). RV LS weakly correlated with max dp/dt (R=.363, P=.002). Early diastolic strain rate did not correlate with EDP in either ventricle. CONCLUSION: Speckle-derived measurements of function in the LV have stronger correlation than the RV to catheter-derived measures. LV global LS has the strongest correlation with invasive function measures in children.
BACKGROUND: Adult studies demonstrate that echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function using speckle tracking correlate with invasive measurements, but such data in the pediatric population are sparse. Our aim was to compare speckle-derived measures of cardiac function to measurements routinely obtained by cardiac catheterization in children. METHODS: Echocardiograms were performed on the day of cardiac catheterization. Using Tomtec 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis, longitudinal strain (LS), longitudinal strain rate (LSR), early diastolic LSR, and ejection fraction (EF) for the right and left ventricle (RV and LV) were calculated via speckle tracking. Global LS and LSR were calculated for the LV. These results were compared to cardiac index, maximum ventricular dp/dt (max dp/dt), ventricular end-diastolic pressure (EDP), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) obtained by fluid-filled catheters. A blinded observer performed all echo measurements. RESULTS: Fifty studies were performed on 28 patients ages 4 months to 20 years old. Their diagnoses included cardiac transplant (48 studies), repaired AV septal defect (1), and dilated cardiomyopathy (1). RVEDP ranged from 2 to 22 mm Hg (median=6) and PCWP ranged from 6 to 32 mmHg (median 10). LV global LS and LV 2-chamber LSR by speckle-tracking negatively correlated with LV max dp/dt (LV global LS R=-.83, P=.001; LV 2-chamber LSR R=-.69, P=.009). RV LS weakly correlated with max dp/dt (R=.363, P=.002). Early diastolic strain rate did not correlate with EDP in either ventricle. CONCLUSION: Speckle-derived measurements of function in the LV have stronger correlation than the RV to catheter-derived measures. LV global LS has the strongest correlation with invasive function measures in children.
Authors: Neil L Greenberg; Michael S Firstenberg; Peter L Castro; Michael Main; Agnese Travaglini; Jill A Odabashian; Jeanne K Drinko; L Leonardo Rodriguez; James D Thomas; Mario J Garcia Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jaroslav Meluzin; Lenka Spinarova; Petr Hude; Jan Krejci; Helena Podrouzkova; Martin Pesl; Marek Orban; Ladislav Dusek; Jiri Jarkovsky; Josef Korinek Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2010-08-04
Authors: Ellen A ten Brinke; Matteo Bertini; Robert J Klautz; M Louisa Antoni; Eduard R Holman; Nico R van de Veire; Jeroen J Bax; Paul Steendijk Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Laurens P Koopman; Cameron Slorach; Cedric Manlhiot; Brian W McCrindle; Edgar T Jaeggi; Luc Mertens; Mark K Friedberg Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Brage H Amundsen; Thomas Helle-Valle; Thor Edvardsen; Hans Torp; Jonas Crosby; Erik Lyseggen; Asbjørn Støylen; Halfdan Ihlen; João A C Lima; Otto A Smiseth; Stig A Slørdahl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nazia Husain; Janaki Gokhale; Lisa Nicholson; Ann Perkins; Amy L Cooper; John P Cheatham; Ralf J Holzer; Clifford L Cua Journal: Acta Cardiol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Sanjiv Kaul; James G Miller; Paul A Grayburn; Shinichi Hashimoto; Mark Hibberd; Mark R Holland; Hélène C Houle; Allan L Klein; Peg Knoll; Roberto M Lang; Jonathan R Lindner; Marti L McCulloch; Stephen Metz; Victor Mor-Avi; Alan S Pearlman; Patricia A Pellikka; Nancy DeMars Plambeck; David Prater; Thomas R Porter; David J Sahn; James D Thomas; Kai E Thomenius; Neil J Weissman Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Niels Risum; Sophia Ali; Niels T Olsen; Christian Jons; Michel G Khouri; Trine K Lauridsen; Zainab Samad; Eric J Velazquez; Peter Sogaard; Joseph Kisslo Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Thor Edvardsen; Bernhard L Gerber; Jérôme Garot; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Otto A Smiseth Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David Steflik; Ryan J Butts; George H Baker; Varsha Bandisode; Andrew Savage; Andrew M Atz; Shahryar M Chowdhury Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 1.724