Louise Thornton1, Catherine Quinn2, Louise Birrell1, Ashleigh Guillaumier3, Brad Shaw1, Erin Forbes3, Mark Deady4, Frances Kay-Lambkin1,3. 1. National Health and Medical Research Council's Centre for Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales. 2. Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology. 3. School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales. 4. Black Dog Institute, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to identify free, high-quality, smoking cessation mobile applications (apps) that adhere to Australian smoking cessation treatment guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search of smoking cessation apps was conducted using Google. The technical quality of relevant apps was rated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The content of apps identified as high quality was assessed for adherence to smoking cessation treatment guidelines. RESULTS: 112 relevant apps were identified. The majority were of poor technical quality and only six 'high-quality' apps were identified. These apps adhered to Australian treatment guidelines in part. The efficacy of two apps had been previously evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In lieu of more substantial research in this area, it is suggested that the high-quality apps identified in this review may be more likely than other available apps to encourage smoking cessation. Implications for public health: Smoking cessation apps have the potential to address many barriers that prevent smoking cessation support being provided; however few high-quality smoking cessation apps are currently available in Australia, very few have been evaluated and the app market is extremely volatile. More research to evaluate smoking cessation apps, and sustained funding for evidence-based apps, is needed.
OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to identify free, high-quality, smoking cessation mobile applications (apps) that adhere to Australian smoking cessation treatment guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search of smoking cessation apps was conducted using Google. The technical quality of relevant apps was rated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The content of apps identified as high quality was assessed for adherence to smoking cessation treatment guidelines. RESULTS: 112 relevant apps were identified. The majority were of poor technical quality and only six 'high-quality' apps were identified. These apps adhered to Australian treatment guidelines in part. The efficacy of two apps had been previously evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In lieu of more substantial research in this area, it is suggested that the high-quality apps identified in this review may be more likely than other available apps to encourage smoking cessation. Implications for public health: Smoking cessation apps have the potential to address many barriers that prevent smoking cessation support being provided; however few high-quality smoking cessation apps are currently available in Australia, very few have been evaluated and the app market is extremely volatile. More research to evaluate smoking cessation apps, and sustained funding for evidence-based apps, is needed.
Authors: Eva-Maria Messner; Niklas Sturm; Yannik Terhorst; Lasse B Sander; Dana Schultchen; Alexandra Portenhauser; Simone Schmidbaur; Michael Stach; Jochen Klaus; Harald Baumeister; Benjamin M Walter Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Ildiko Tombor; Emma Beard; Jamie Brown; Lion Shahab; Susan Michie; Robert West Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Breno Bernardes-Souza; Francisco Patruz Ananias De Assis Pires; Gustavo Moreira Madeira; Túlio Felício Da Cunha Rodrigues; Martina Gatzka; Markus V Heppt; Albert J Omlor; Alexander H Enk; David A Groneberg; Werner Seeger; Christof von Kalle; Carola Berking; Paulo César Rodrigues Pinto Corrêa; Janina Leonie Suhre; Jonas Alfitian; Aisllan Assis; Titus Josef Brinker Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2018-07-17
Authors: Minda A Gowarty; Meghan R Longacre; Roger Vilardaga; Nathan J Kung; Ashley E Gaughan-Maher; Mary F Brunette Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2021-07-07
Authors: Titus J Brinker; Jonas Alfitian; Werner Seeger; David A Groneberg; Christof von Kalle; Alexander H Enk; Felix J F Herth; Michael Kreuter; Claudia M Bauer; Martina Gatzka; Janina L Suhre Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 3.390