Louise K Thornton1, Frances J Kay-Lambkin1,2. 1. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 2. School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread development of mobile health apps, there is a paucity of research investigating user views of apps and their features, particularly among people with mental health problems. This study aimed to gain an understanding of the acceptability of specific features of current and emerging mobile health apps among people with and without mental health problems. METHODS: Adults living in Australia were recruited to complete a self-report questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics, mental health, technology use, and attitudes regarding specific features of mobile health apps. RESULTS: A total of 284 participants were recruited, including 53% with a history of mental illness. Few concerns were reported with mobile app features (mean =1.8 features; SD =2.19) and statistical analyses found that age, gender, income, rurality, mental health status and technology use did not affect the expression of these concerns. Key issues identified included privacy and security of personal information, apps acting automatically, sharing personal information and the invasive nature of some features. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mental illness may not be a barrier to widespread use of mobile technologies for health purposes. It is hoped that this research will assist developers and clinicians to develop and integrate mobile health apps into everyday care more effectively.
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread development of mobile health apps, there is a paucity of research investigating user views of apps and their features, particularly among people with mental health problems. This study aimed to gain an understanding of the acceptability of specific features of current and emerging mobile health apps among people with and without mental health problems. METHODS: Adults living in Australia were recruited to complete a self-report questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics, mental health, technology use, and attitudes regarding specific features of mobile health apps. RESULTS: A total of 284 participants were recruited, including 53% with a history of mental illness. Few concerns were reported with mobile app features (mean =1.8 features; SD =2.19) and statistical analyses found that age, gender, income, rurality, mental health status and technology use did not affect the expression of these concerns. Key issues identified included privacy and security of personal information, apps acting automatically, sharing personal information and the invasive nature of some features. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mental illness may not be a barrier to widespread use of mobile technologies for health purposes. It is hoped that this research will assist developers and clinicians to develop and integrate mobile health apps into everyday care more effectively.
Entities:
Keywords:
Smartphones; mental disorder; mobile applications; mobile health
Authors: Wendy Brouwer; Willemieke Kroeze; Rik Crutzen; Jascha de Nooijer; Nanne K de Vries; Johannes Brug; Anke Oenema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Michael Bauer; Tasha Glenn; John Geddes; Michael Gitlin; Paul Grof; Lars V Kessing; Scott Monteith; Maria Faurholt-Jepsen; Emanuel Severus; Peter C Whybrow Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2020-01-10
Authors: Kevin Christopher McKenna; Cindy Geoghegan; Teresa Swezey; Brian Perry; William A Wood; Virginia Nido; Steve L Morin; Brigid K Grabert; Zachary P Hallinan; Amy L Corneli Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Martha Neary; John Bunyi; Kristina Palomares; David C Mohr; Adam Powell; Josef Ruzek; Leanne M Williams; Til Wykes; Stephen M Schueller Journal: Digit Health Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Sophie Eis; Oriol Solà-Morales; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Josep Vidal-Alaball; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Noemí Robles; Carme Carrion Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Julia A Schweiger; Ginger E Nicol; Amanda R Ricchio; Christopher L Metts; Michael D Yingling; Alex T Ramsey; J Philip Miller; Eric J Lenze Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 4.773