Literature DB >> 28748260

Clinical predictors for reactive tube feeding in patients with advanced oropharynx cancer receiving radiotherapy ± chemotherapy.

Belinda Vangelov1,2, Robert I Smee3,4,5.   

Abstract

Enteral feeding is often required for nutrition support in head and neck cancer patients when oral intake is inadequate. When to initiate the insertion of a feeding tube continues to be a debated issue in our institution. We investigated the use of reactive feeding tubes (RFTs) in patients with advanced stage oropharynx cancer (OPC). Data were retrospectively collected on 131 patients who had radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy from 2005 to 2015. Predictors for RFT insertion were investigated. Weight loss during RT was compared between those with RFT versus prophylactic tubes (PFTs) versus no tube, and survival outcomes evaluated. RFTs were more likely to be needed in patients who had bilateral neck node irradiation (p = 0.001) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (p = 0.038). Patients with RFTs had significantly higher mean percentage weight loss during RT (9.5 ± 3.4%) (p < 0.001) when compared to those with a PFT (5.2 ± 4.7%) and those with no tube (5.4 ± 3.1%). No difference was seen in 5-year survival rates in patients who did not have a feeding tube to those who required a RFT. RFT use is frequent in OPC, although difficult to predict. CRT and bilateral neck node irradiation were found to be associated with the need for the insertion of a feeding tube during RT. These patients also experience significantly higher weight loss, therefore, prophylactic tubes may need to be considered more often in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Nutrition; Oropharynx cancer; Prophylactic feeding tubes; Reactive feeding tubes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748260     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4681-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  35 in total

1.  Decreased hospital stay and significant cost savings after routine use of prophylactic gastrostomy for high-risk patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy at a tertiary cancer institution.

Authors:  Brett G M Hughes; Vikram K Jain; Teresa Brown; Ann-Louise Spurgin; Gemma Hartnett; Jacqui Keller; Lee Tripcony; Mark Appleyard; Robert Hodge
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Jonathan C Romanyshyn; Karen D Schupak; Jeremy Setton; Nadeem Riaz; Suzanne L Wolden; Daphna Y Gelblum; Eric J Sherman; Dennis Kraus; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prophylactic versus reactive PEG tube placement in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Scott Kramer; Matthew Newcomb; Joshua Hessler; Farzan Siddiqui
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  The impact of nutritional status on the prognoses of patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  P A van Leeuwen; D J Kuik; W M Klop; H P Sauerwein; G B Snow; J J Quak
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Gastrostomy tubes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Khwaja Asif Ahmed; Sandeep Samant; Francisco Vieira
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation for cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  J H Lee; M Machtay; L D Unger; G S Weinstein; R S Weber; A A Chalian; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-08

Review 7.  Nutritional support during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the role of prophylactic feeding tube placement.

Authors:  Jormain Cady
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.027

8.  Early nutritional intervention in oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marie-Astrid Piquet; Mahmut Ozsahin; Isabelle Larpin; Abderrahim Zouhair; Pauline Coti; May Monney; Philippe Monnier; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Michel Roulet
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Factors associated with long-term dysphagia after definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Jimmy J Caudell; Philip E Schaner; Ruby F Meredith; Julie L Locher; Lisle M Nabell; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson; Sharon A Spencer; James A Bonner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Comparative effects of different enteral feeding methods in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhang; Yu Zhu; Yun Ling; Lijuan Zhang; Hongwei Wan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Conformity and Homogeneity Indices Consistency Throughout the Course of Head and Neck Cancer Treatment With and Without Using Adaptive Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Salam Abdulrazzaq Ibrahim Al-Rawi; Hassan Abouelenein; Magdy Mohammed Khalil; Haidar Hamza Alabdei; Awf Abdulrahman Sulaiman; Dalya Saad Al-Nuaimi; Mohamed El-Sayed El Nagdy
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.