BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of routine placement of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pPEG) tubes was assessed in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who are undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS: From 1998 through 2009, 400 consecutive patients with OPC who underwent chemoradiation were included. Of these, 325 had a pPEG and 75 did not (nPEG). Weight and albumin change from baseline to mid-IMRT, end of IMRT, 1 month post-IMRT, and 3 months post-IMRT were evaluated. The treating physicians prospectively recorded acute and late toxicities. RESULTS: Significantly lower absolute weight loss at end of IMRT (6.80 kg vs 8.38 kg, P = .007), 1 month post-IMRT (9.06 kg vs 11.33 kg, P = .006), and 3 months post-IMRT (11.10 kg vs 13.09 kg, P = .044) was noted in the pPEG versus nPEG groups. This benefit in reduction of percent weight loss was consistently significant only among patients with BMI < 25. Significant differences were noted in hospital admission rate (15.1% vs 26.7%, P = .026) and volume of nonchemotherapy hydration (8.9 liters vs 17.2 liters, P = .004). There were no differences in percent albumin change, acute dysphagia, acute mucositis, acute xerostomia, chronic dysphagia, radiation treatment duration, and overall survival. Multivariate analysis noted age >55 years (P < .001), female sex (P < .001), and T3/4 category disease (P < .001) were significantly associated with prolonged PEG use. CONCLUSIONS: Although pPEG reduced absolute and percent weight loss and need for hospitalizations in our cohort of patients with OPC undergoing chemoradiation, no differences were noted in radiation treatment duration, toxicity, and overall survival. Prolonged PEG use correlated with age >55 years, female sex, and T3/T4 tumors.
BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of routine placement of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pPEG) tubes was assessed in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who are undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS: From 1998 through 2009, 400 consecutive patients with OPC who underwent chemoradiation were included. Of these, 325 had a pPEG and 75 did not (nPEG). Weight and albumin change from baseline to mid-IMRT, end of IMRT, 1 month post-IMRT, and 3 months post-IMRT were evaluated. The treating physicians prospectively recorded acute and late toxicities. RESULTS: Significantly lower absolute weight loss at end of IMRT (6.80 kg vs 8.38 kg, P = .007), 1 month post-IMRT (9.06 kg vs 11.33 kg, P = .006), and 3 months post-IMRT (11.10 kg vs 13.09 kg, P = .044) was noted in the pPEG versus nPEG groups. This benefit in reduction of percent weight loss was consistently significant only among patients with BMI < 25. Significant differences were noted in hospital admission rate (15.1% vs 26.7%, P = .026) and volume of nonchemotherapy hydration (8.9 liters vs 17.2 liters, P = .004). There were no differences in percent albumin change, acute dysphagia, acute mucositis, acute xerostomia, chronic dysphagia, radiation treatment duration, and overall survival. Multivariate analysis noted age >55 years (P < .001), female sex (P < .001), and T3/4 category disease (P < .001) were significantly associated with prolonged PEG use. CONCLUSIONS: Although pPEG reduced absolute and percent weight loss and need for hospitalizations in our cohort of patients with OPC undergoing chemoradiation, no differences were noted in radiation treatment duration, toxicity, and overall survival. Prolonged PEG use correlated with age >55 years, female sex, and T3/T4 tumors.
Authors: Jeremy Setton; Nicola Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Lawrence Koutcher; Suzanne L Wolden; Michael J Zelefsky; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J Sherman; Matthew G Fury; David G Pfister; Richard J Wong; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D Schupak; Daphna Y Gelblum; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nam P Nguyen; Paul Vos; Herbert J Smith; Phuc D Nguyen; Alan Alfieri; Ulf Karlsson; Suresh Dutta; Claire Lemanski; Ly M Nguyen; Sabah Sallah Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.808
Authors: N P Nguyen; C C Moltz; C Frank; P Vos; H J Smith; U Karlsson; S Dutta; F A Midyett; J Barloon; S Sallah Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: D M Brizel; M E Albers; S R Fisher; R L Scher; W J Richtsmeier; V Hars; S L George; A T Huang; L R Prosnitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T F Pajak; G E Laramore; V A Marcial; J T Fazekas; J Cooper; P Rubin; W J Curran; L W Davis Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Paul B Romesser; Oren Cahlon; Eli D Scher; Eugen B Hug; Kevin Sine; Carl DeSelm; Jana L Fox; Dennis Mah; Madhur K Garg; John Han-Chih Chang; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Paul B Romesser; Oren Cahlon; Eli Scher; Ying Zhou; Sean L Berry; Alisa Rybkin; Kevin M Sine; Shikui Tang; Eric J Sherman; Richard Wong; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Nedeljko Jovanovic; Colleen Dreyer; Sarah Hawkins; Kendra Thouless; David Palma; Philip C Doyle; Julie A Theurer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 3.603