| Literature DB >> 28747912 |
Raquel Ruiz-García1,2, Carmen Rodríguez-Vigil3, Francisco Manuel Marco4, Fernando Gallego-Bustos1, María José Castro-Panete1,2, Laura Diez-Alonso1, Carlos Muñoz-Ruiz4, Jesús Ruiz-Contreras2,5, Estela Paz-Artal1,2,6,7, Luis Ignacio González-Granado2,5, Luis Miguel Allende1,2.
Abstract
GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) deficiency is a rare disorder of hematopoiesis, lymphatics, and immunity caused by spontaneous or autosomal dominant mutations in the GATA2 gene. Clinical manifestations range from neutropenia, lymphedema, deafness, to severe viral and mycobacterial infections, bone marrow failure, and acute myeloid leukemia. Patients also present with monocytopenia, dendritic cell, B- and natural killer (NK)-cell deficiency. We studied the T-cell and NK-cell compartments of four GATA2-deficient patients to assess if changes in these lymphocyte populations could be correlated with clinical phenotype. Patients with more severe clinical complications demonstrated a senescent T-cell phenotype whereas patients with lower clinical score had undetectable changes relative to controls. In contrast, patients' NK-cells demonstrated an immature/activated phenotype that did not correlate with clinical score, suggesting an intrinsic NK-cell defect. These studies will help us to determine the contribution of T- and NK-cell dysregulation to the clinical phenotype of GATA2 patients, and may help to establish the most accurate therapeutic options for these patients. Asymptomatic patients may be taken into consideration for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation when dysregulation of T-cell and NK-cell compartment is present.Entities:
Keywords: GATA binding protein 2; T-cell; myelodysplastic syndrome; natural killer-cell; primary immunodeficiency
Year: 2017 PMID: 28747912 PMCID: PMC5506090 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Immunologic features of the patients.
| Variables | Normal rangechildren | Normal range adults | P1 (12 years) | P2 (26 years) | P3 (11 years) | P4 (32 years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutrophils (n°/μL) | 1,800–7,600 | 1,800–7,400 | 1,800 | 6,600 | 800 | 6,310 |
| Monocytes (n°/μL) | 200–900 | 300–900 | 16 | 7 | 250 | 217 |
| Lymphocyte (n°/μL) | 1,500–4,000 | 1,200–3,000 | 3,169 | 679 | 913 | 2,188 |
| CD3+ (n°/μL) | 800–2,600 | 850–2,250 | 3,106 | 638 | 880 | 2,168 |
| CD4+ (n°/μL) | 600–1,500 | 500–1,450 | 1,648 | 285 | 240 | 905 |
| CD8+ (n°/μL) | 250–1,000 | 160–950 | 1,458 | 319 | 492 | 1,206 |
| DN T cells CD3+TCRαβ+CD4−CD8− (%) | 0–4 | 0–4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 0.4 |
| CD4+CD45RA+CD31+ (%) | 44–60 | 20–44 | 63 | 31 | 16 | NA |
| PHA (cpm) | >50,000 | >50,000 | NA | NA | 45,441 | NA |
| Anti-CD3 (cpm) | >2,000 | >9,000 | NA | NA | 14,337 | NA |
| PMA + ionomicin (cpm) | >60,000 | >60,000 | NA | NA | 84,411 | NA |
| CD3−CD56+ (n°/μL) | 80–600 | 60–500 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
| CD3+CD56+ (n°/μL) | 40–115 | 35–85 | 253 | 109 | 621 | 525 |
| CD19+ (n°/μL) | 200–700 | 100–500 | 48 | 34 | 21 | 18 |
| CD19+CD27+ (%) | 7–19 | 11.8–34.7 | 36 | 71.3 | 24 | 62 |
| CD19+IgD+CD27− (naive) (%) | 75–89 | 57.4–83.9 | NA | 15.3 | 50.6 | 25 |
| CD19+IgD+CD27+ (marginal zone) (%) | 2.5–7 | 4–11.8 | NA | 18.4 | 16.5 | 31.9 |
| CD19+IgD−CD27+ (switching) (%) | 4.5–13 | 6.3–24.9 | NA | 52.5 | 16.2 | 28.7 |
| CD19+CD21 low (%) | 3.3–9.5 | 3.36–9.53 | 14.3 | NA | 12 | 20.7 |
| CD19+CD38+IgM+ (transitionals) (%) | 1–9 | 1–9 | NA | NA | 7.8 | 0.5 |
| CD19+CD38+IgM− (plasmablasts) (%) | 0–2.5 | 0–2.5 | NA | NA | 2.5 | 6 |
| Dendritic cells CD4+HLA−DR+CD123+ (%) | 0.5–1 | 0.5–1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| IgG (mg/dL) | 600–1,230 | 700–1,600 | 1,040 | 2,070 | 643 | 2,580 |
| IgA (mg/dL) | 30–200 | 70–400 | 64 | 588 | 43 | 415 |
| IgM (mg/dL) | 50–200 | 40–230 | 73 | 207 | 98 | 218 |
| IgG vs pneumococcus (mg/dL) | >5.40 | >5.40 | NA | NA | 10.4 | NA |
| IgG2 vs pneumococcus (mg/dL) | >2.14 | >2.14 | NA | NA | 2.88 | NA |
| IgG vs tetanus toxoid (IU/mL) | >0.15 | >0.15 | 0.40 | NA | 0.88 | NA |
| Cytogenetics | 46,XX | 46,XY | +8 | NA | ||
| Mutations | R337X | M236Ifs325X | K378X | T354M | ||
| AD | ||||||
| Clinical score | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||
Figure 1Peripheral blood T-cell compartment in GATA2-deficient patients. (A) Percentage of CD3+TCRαβ+ and CD3+TCRγδ+ T cells of GATA2 patients and healthy donors. Example representing CD3+TCRαβ+ and CD3+TCRγδ+ T cells from P3 and a healthy control. (B) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells subsets and examples of P1, P4, and a control (adult). Naïve CD4+ (CCR7+CD45RA+), memory CD4+ (CCR7+CD45RA−), naïve CD8+ (CCR7+CD45RA+), memory CD8+ (CCR7±CD45RA−), and TEMRA CD8+ (CCR7−CD45RA+). P1 and P3 were compared with children controls whereas P2 and P4 were compared with adult controls. Lines represent mean and bars represent the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Senescence and maturation markers of peripheral T cells in GATA2-deficient patients. (A) CD27 expression in naïve T cells. (B) CD95 expression in naïve T cells. (C) CD57 expression in CD4 and CD8 T cells. P1 and P3 were compared with child controls whereas P2 and P4 were compared with adult controls. Lines represent mean and bars represent the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3NK- and NKT-cell phenotype in GATA2-deficient patients. (A) Percentage of NK cells (CD3−CD56+) of GATA2 patients and controls. (B) Percentage of NKT cells (CD3+CD56+) of GATA2 patients and healthy donors. (C) CD27 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. (D) CD25 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. (E) CD69 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. (F) DNAM1 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. (G) CD16 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. (H) CD8 expression in CD56 dim NK cells. Lines represent mean and bars represent the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.