| Literature DB >> 30984189 |
Shabnum Patel1,2, Haili Lang1, Gelina Sani1, Alexandra F Freeman3, Jennifer Leiding4,5,6, Patrick J Hanley1,7, Conrad Russell Cruz1,2, Melanie Grant1, Yunfei Wang8, Benjamin Oshrine6, Cindy Palmer3, Steven M Holland3, Catherine M Bollard1,2,7, Michael D Keller1,9.
Abstract
Mycobacterial Infections can be severe in patients with T-cell deficiency or phagocyte disorders, and treatment is frequently complicated by antimicrobial resistance. Restoration of T-cell immunity via stem cell transplantation facilitates control of mycobacterial infections, but presence of active infections during transplantation is associated with a higher risk of mortality. Adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been successful in targeting viruses, but has not been attempted to treat mycobacterial infections. We sought to expand and characterize mycobacterial-specific T-cells derived from healthy donors in order to determine suitability for adoptive immunotherapy. Mycobacteria-specific T-cells (MSTs) were generated from 10 healthy donors using a rapid ex vivo expansion protocol targeting five known mycobacterial target proteins (AG85B, PPE68, ESXA, ESXB, and ADK). MSTs were compared to T-cells expanded from the same donors using lysate from M. tuberculosis or purified protein derivative from M. avium (sensitin). MST expansion from seven patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PID) and two patients with IFN-γ autoantibodies and invasive M. avium infections. MSTs expanded from healthy donors recognized a median of 3 of 5 antigens, with production of IFN-γ, TNF, and GM-CSF in CD4+ T cells. Comparison of donors who received BCG vaccine (n = 6) to those who did not (n = 4) showed differential responses to PPE68 (p = 0.028) and ADK (p = 0.015) by IFN-γ ELISpot. MSTs expanded from lysate or sensitin also recognized multiple mycobacterial antigens, with a statistically significant differences noted only in the response to PPE68 (p = 0.016). MSTs expanded from patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) and invasive mycobacterial infections showed activity against mycobacterial antigens in only two of seven subjects, whereas both patients with IFN-γ autoantibodies recognized mycobacterial antigens. Thus, MSTs can be generated from donors using a rapid expansion protocol regardless of history of BCG immunization. Most tested PID patients had no detectable T-cell immunity to mycobacteria despite history of infection. MSTs may have clinical utility for adoptive immunotherapy in T-cell deficient patients with invasive mycobacterial infections.Entities:
Keywords: T cells; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; immunotherapy; mendelian suspectibility to mycobacteria; mycobacteria; primary immunodeficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 30984189 PMCID: PMC6450173 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Manufacturing schema of ex vivo expansion of mycobacteria-specific T cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are stimulated with overlapping peptide pools encompassing listed mycobacterial antigens and cultured in a G-Rex-10 bioreactor with cytokines for 10–12 days.
Figure 2MSTs expanded from healthy donors recognize multiple mycobacterial antigens. IFN-γ ELISpot of ex vivo expanded MSTs at day 10 showed specificity to multiple mycobacterial antigens in both BCG immunized donors (A) and non-BCG vaccinated donors (B). Significant differences between groups was noted in the responses against PPE68 (*p = 0.028) and ADK (**p = 0.015). SFC, Spot forming colonies.
Figure 3Expanded MSTs are mostly CD4+ effectors. (A) Mycobacterial-specific T cells expanded during culture with a mean fold-expansion of 4.4. BCG- = BCG non-immunized; BCG+ = BCG immunized. (B) Surface phenotyping of MSTs following expansion showed a predominance of CD4+ T cells with large effector memory population and smaller central memory population. Lines, median value. (C) Example plots from MSTs expanded from Donor 9 show a large CD4+ effector memory (TEM) population and smaller effector (Teff) and central memory (Tcm) population, with minimal naïve T cells (Tn).
Figure 4MSTs expanded from healthy donors are polyfunctional. Intracellular flow cytometry demonstrated production of IFN-γ and TNF in response to mycobacterial pepmix restimulation exclusively in CD4+ T cells from MSTs expanded from healthy donors, with no responses seen in CD8+ T cells.
Figure 5MSTs are deficient in most patients with PID. (A) IFN-γ ELISpot of T cells expanded from patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PID) showed decreased to absent responses to mycobacterial antigens, with exception of a patient with NFKB1 haploinsufficiency. Two patients with IFN-γ autoantibodies had detectable responses. SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B; CID, combined immunodeficiency. (B) Ex vivo culture of T cells from patients with PID yielded no expansion in all but two patients.
Figure 6MST responses are comparable using peptide stimulation vs. lysate or sensitin. IFN-γ ELISpot from MSTs expanded using TB lysate (A) or M avium sensitin (B) showed specificity to multiple mycobacterial pepmixes, which were comparable in magnitude to the response to restimulation with lysate or sensitin. Differences in responses were only significant for PPE68 (*p = 0.032). SFC, spot forming colonies; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B.
Figure 7MSTs recognize multiple epitopes within AG85B and ESXB. Epitope mapping of AG85B (A) and ESXB (B) via IFN-γ ELISpot showed eight peptides from AG85B and three from ESXB recognized by MSTs from multiple healthy donors. SFC, spot forming colonies; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B.
Predicted MHC Restrictions of T cell epitopes within AG85B and ESXB.
| AG85B | DIKVQFQSGGNNSPA | Donor 3 | 02:01, 24:07 | 15:02, 35:05 | 04:01, 08:01 | 03:01, 03:03 | 09:01, 12:02 | 03:01 | ||||
| Donor 7 | 03:01, 29:02 | 14:02, 35:01 | 04:01, 08:02 | 02:02, 05:03 | 14:54, | |||||||
| Donor 8 | 02:01, 24:02 | 14:01, 18:01 | 08:02, 12:03 | 02:02, 03:01 | 11:04, | 04:02, 06:01 | ||||||
| Donor 9 | 11:01, 24:02 | 15:02, 48:02 | 04:01, 08:01 | 03:02, 05:01 | 10:01, 04:11 | |||||||
| GCQTYKWETFLTSEL | Donor 5 | 02:01, 24:07 | 15:02, 35:05 | 04:01, 08:01 | 03:01, 03:03 | 09:01, 12:02 | 03:01 | 01:01 | 04:02, 05:01 | |||
| Donor 7 | 03:01, 29:02 | 14:02, 35:01 | 04:01, 08:02 | 02:02, 05:03 | 14:54, 07:01 | 02:02 | ||||||
| Donor 9 | 11:01, 24:02 | 15:02, 48:02 | 04:01, 08:01 | 03:02, 05:01 | 10:01, 04:11 | |||||||
| Donor 10 | 01:xx, 24:xx | 08:xx, 58:xx | 03:xx, 07:xx | 02:xx | 03:xx | 02:xx, 01:xx | ||||||
| LTSELPQWLSANRAV | Donor 7 | 03:01, 29:02 | 14:02, 35:01 | 04:01, 08:02 | 02:02, 05:03 | 14:54, | 04:01, 15:01 | |||||
| Donor 8 | 02:01, 24:02 | 14:01, 18:01 | 08:02, 12:03 | 02:02, 03:01 | 11:04, | 04:02, 06:01 | ||||||
| QQFIYAGSLSALLDP | Donor 3 | 02:01, 24:07 | 15:02, 35:05 | 04:01, 08:01 | 03:01, 03:03 | 09:01, 12:02 | 03:01 | 01:01 | ||||
| Donor 7 | 03:01, 29:02 | 14:02, 35:01 | 04:01, 08:02 | 02:02, 05:03 | 14:54, | 02:02 | 01:01 | |||||
| Donor 8 | 02:01, 24:02 | 14:01, 18:01 | 08:02, 12:03 | 02:02, 03:01 | 11:04, | 02:02 | 01:01 | |||||
| ESXB | EISTNIRQAGVQYSR | Donor 3 | 02:01, 24:07 | 15:02, 35:05 | 04:01, 08:01 | 09:01, 12:02 | 03:01 | |||||
| Donor 9 | 11:01, 24:02 | 15:02, 48:02 | 04:01, 08:01 | 10:01, 04:11 | ||||||||
| VQYSRADEEQQQALS | Donor 3 | 02:01, 24:07 | 15:02, 35:05 | 04:01, 08:01 | 09:01, 12:02 | 03:01 | ||||||
| Donor 9 | 11:01, 24:02 | 15:02, 48:02 | 04:01, 08:01 | 10:01, 04:11 |
Bold significant shared HLA alleles and Blue significant top predicted HLA restriction.