| Literature DB >> 28747648 |
Gaia Olivo1, Wei Zhou2, Magnus Sundbom3, Christina Zhukovsky2, Pleunie Hogenkamp2, Lamia Nikontovic2, Julia Stark2, Lyle Wiemerslage2, Elna-Marie Larsson4, Christian Benedict2, Helgi B Schiöth2.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is an effective method to rapidly induce weight loss in severely obese people, however its impact on brain functional connectivity after longer periods of follow-up is yet to be assessed. We investigated changes in connectivity in 16 severely obese women one month before, one month after and one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB). 12 lean controls were also enrolled. Resting-state fMRI was acquired for all participants following an overnight fast and after a 260 kcal load. Connectivity between regions involved in food-related saliency attribution and reward-driven eating behavior was stronger in presurgery patients compared to controls, but progressively weakened after follow-up. At one year, changes in networks related to cognitive control over eating and bodily perception also occurred. Connectivity between regions involved in emotional control and social cognition had a temporary reduction early after treatment but had increased again after one year of follow-up. Furthermore, we could predict the BMI loss by presurgery connectivity in areas linked to emotional control and social interaction. RYGBP seems to reshape brain functional connectivity, early affecting cognitive control over eating, and these changes could be an important part of the therapeutic effect of bariatric surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28747648 PMCID: PMC5529553 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06663-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Lean controls vs presurgery patients: effect of group on connectivity.
| F-test | Seed ROI | F | p uncorr |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Precuneus | 29.48 | 0.000 |
| Cerebellum 9 L | 22.84 | 0.001 | |
| Superior Lateral Occipital Cortex R | 22.82 | 0.001 | |
| Medial Frontal Cortex | 21.8 | 0.001 | |
| Posterior Cingulate Cortex | 21.4 | 0.002 | |
| Amygdala L | 21.31 | 0.002 | |
| Planum Temporale R | 18.05 | 0.006 | |
| Anterior Parahippocampal Gyrus R | 16.89 | 0.010 |
Within patients main effect of time and feeding condition on connectivity.
| Test | Seed ROI | F | p uncorr |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Posterior Cingulate Cortex | 25.54 | 0.002 |
| Precuneus | 20.38 | 0.003 | |
| Supplementary Motor Area L | 16.91 | 0.004 | |
| Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus R | 16.32 | 0.005 | |
| Amygdala R | 14.77 | 0.006 | |
| Vermis 10 | 11.42 | 0.010 | |
|
| Occipital Fusiform Gyrus L | 46.30 | 0.000 |
| Posterior Temporal Fusiform Gyrus L | 20.70 | 0.001 |
Seed-to-target changes in connectivity over time.
| Seed ROI | Target ROI | T-values | p FDR-corr | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS > LC | PS > 1 m | PS > 1 y | PS > LC | PS > 1 m | PS > 1 y | ||
|
| Anterior Superior Temporal Gyrus L | 7.9 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Posterior Supramarginal Gyrus L | 3.7 | 4.2 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||
| Temporo-occipital Middle Temporal Gyrus R | 3.5 | 3.7 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |||
| Amygdala R | 3.3 | 8.1 | 0.05 | 0.00 | |||
|
| Posterior Temporal Fusiform Gyrus R | 5.7 | 5.8 | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||
| Anterior Superior Temporal Gyrus L | 4.1 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Inferior Lateral Occipital Cortex R | 3.7 | 3.4 | 0.03 | 0.05 | |||
| Amygdala R | 3.5 | 5.3 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |||
| Anterior Middle Temporal Gyrus R | 3.4 | 4.1 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |||
| Precentral Gyrus L | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0.05 | 0.03 | |||
| Anterior Temporal Fusiform Gyrus R | 3.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
PS = presurgery. 1 m = 1-month follow-up. 1 y = 1-year follow-up.
Figure 1Seed-to-target connectivity changes over time. The figure shows the seed-to-ROI connectivity found to be significantly different between groups. The red lines represent connections found to be stronger in presurgery patients (PS) compared to all other groups (lean controls, 1 month follow-up and 1 year follow-up). The yellow lines represent connections where a minor change occurred, as they were found to be stronger in presurgery patients compared with both lean controls (LS) and 1 month follow-up (1 m), but not to 1 year follow-up (1 y) nor between lean controls and 1 year follow-up. The green lines represent the connections where a change in connectivity was observed more slowly, as their connectivity was stronger in presurgery patients compared with lean controls and 1 year follow-up, but not compared with 1 month follow-up. All results were significant with a p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons with a FDR approach. The image was generated with the CONN software used for the analysis.
Within-patients: connections with greater seed-to-target connectivity in the sated compared with the fasted state.
| Seed ROI | Target ROI | T | p FDR-corr analyses-level |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Posterior Temporal Fusiform Gyrus L | 6.21 | 0.01 |
| Cerebellum 1 R | 6.06 | 0.01 | |
| Occipital Pole L | 4.53 | 0.05 | |
| Cerebellum 2 R | 4.24 | 0.05 | |
| Superior Lateral Occipital Cortex L | 4.21 | 0.05 | |
|
| Occipital Fusiform Gyrus L | 6.21 | 0.01 |
| Occipital Fusiform Gyrus R | 6.12 | 0.01 | |
| Precentral Gyrus R | 4.35 | 0.05 |
Figure 2Within-patients effect of the feeding condition on connectivity. The figure shows connections where connectivity was found to be greater in the sated state compared to the fasted state, in patients. Blue circles represent seeds regions; green circles represent target ROIs. The image was generated with the CONN software used for the analysis.
Figure 3Positive correlation between baseline connectivity and BMI loss at 1 year follow-up. The figures shows seed (black font) to target (grey font) connections where a positive correlations was found between presurgery connectivity and BMI loss over 1 year of follow-up. Results are corrected for multiple comparisons with a FDR approach. The image was generated with the CONN software used for the analysis.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria from the study.
| Inclusion Criteria: | Exclusion Criteria: |
|---|---|
| 1 Patients completing bariatric surgery | 1 Claustrophobia, metallic implants, or other contraindications for MRI scanning |
| 2 Sex = female | 2 Previous bariatric surgery |
| 3 BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 | 3 Illicit drug use |
| 4 Age = 18–60 years | 4 Diabetic or use of insulin |
| 5 Right-handed | 5 History of alcohol, drug, or medication abuse in last 2 years |
| 6 Non-smoking | 6 Current psychiatric diagnosis |
| 7 Use of psychoactive drugs | |
| 8 Use of opiates or benzodiazapines | |
| 9 Severe medical impairment | |
| 10 Unstable social situation/unlikely to comply |