BACKGROUND: Model predictive control (MPC) performance depends on the accuracy of the prediction model implemented by the controller. Complex physiology and modeling limitations often prevent the ability to provide long and accurate glucose predictions, which results in the need to account for prediction errors. METHOD: Optimal insulin dosage by Zone-MPC is calculated by solving an optimization problem in which a scalar index is minimized by penalizing relative input deviations and glucose predictions out of the reference zone. The controller's tuning parameters are the penalties on the input variable (insulin). Positive and negative relative inputs are penalized differently. A dynamic adaptation of the tuning parameters based on the accuracy of the model in recent history is implemented in this article and compared in silico to aggressive and conservative tunings of the same controller structure. RESULTS: Similar average glucose and time in the safe glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) are achieved for the adaptive design and traditional controller configurations. However, percentage time under 70 mg/dL is significantly reduced, both for announced meals using bolus compensation and unannounced meals with a meal detection algorithm triggered bolus. No differences in the average insulin delivered were observed between the adaptive design and the conservative or aggressive tuning for the bolus strategy, and the adaptive controller delivered less insulin in the other scenario considered. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive strategy provides safe and effective glucose management as well as significant reduction of hypoglycemia events. No abnormal insulin delivery profiles were observed upon the application of the adaptive strategy.
BACKGROUND: Model predictive control (MPC) performance depends on the accuracy of the prediction model implemented by the controller. Complex physiology and modeling limitations often prevent the ability to provide long and accurate glucose predictions, which results in the need to account for prediction errors. METHOD: Optimal insulin dosage by Zone-MPC is calculated by solving an optimization problem in which a scalar index is minimized by penalizing relative input deviations and glucose predictions out of the reference zone. The controller's tuning parameters are the penalties on the input variable (insulin). Positive and negative relative inputs are penalized differently. A dynamic adaptation of the tuning parameters based on the accuracy of the model in recent history is implemented in this article and compared in silico to aggressive and conservative tunings of the same controller structure. RESULTS: Similar average glucose and time in the safe glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) are achieved for the adaptive design and traditional controller configurations. However, percentage time under 70 mg/dL is significantly reduced, both for announced meals using bolus compensation and unannounced meals with a meal detection algorithm triggered bolus. No differences in the average insulin delivered were observed between the adaptive design and the conservative or aggressive tuning for the bolus strategy, and the adaptive controller delivered less insulin in the other scenario considered. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive strategy provides safe and effective glucose management as well as significant reduction of hypoglycemia events. No abnormal insulin delivery profiles were observed upon the application of the adaptive strategy.
Entities:
Keywords:
artificial pancreas; model accuracy; model predictive control; residuals analysis
Authors: Matthew W Percival; Wendy C Bevier; Youqing Wang; Eyal Dassau; Howard C Zisser; Lois Jovanovič; Francis J Doyle Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-09-01
Authors: Lalo Magni; Davide M Raimondo; Luca Bossi; Chiara Dalla Man; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2007-11
Authors: Rebecca A Harvey; Eyal Dassau; Wendy C Bevier; Dale E Seborg; Lois Jovanovič; Francis J Doyle; Howard C Zisser Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Boris P Kovatchev; Eric Renard; Claudio Cobelli; Howard C Zisser; Patrick Keith-Hynes; Stacey M Anderson; Sue A Brown; Daniel R Chernavvsky; Marc D Breton; Anne Farret; Marie-Josée Pelletier; Jérôme Place; Daniela Bruttomesso; Simone Del Favero; Roberto Visentin; Alessio Filippi; Rachele Scotton; Angelo Avogaro; Francis J Doyle Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jordan E Pinsker; Alejandro J Laguna Sanz; Joon Bok Lee; Mei Mei Church; Camille Andre; Laura E Lindsey; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Navid Resalat; Wade Hilts; Joseph El Youssef; Nichole Tyler; Jessica R Castle; Peter G Jacobs Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-10-09
Authors: John H Abel; Marcus A Badgeley; Taylor E Baum; Sourish Chakravarty; Patrick L Purdon; Emery N Brown Journal: Proc IFAC World Congress Date: 2021-04-14