Literature DB >> 28744901

Input and Age-Dependent Variation in Second Language Learning: A Connectionist Account.

Marius Janciauskas1, Franklin Chang1.   

Abstract

Language learning requires linguistic input, but several studies have found that knowledge of second language (L2) rules does not seem to improve with more language exposure (e.g., Johnson & Newport, 1989). One reason for this is that previous studies did not factor out variation due to the different rules tested. To examine this issue, we reanalyzed grammaticality judgment scores in Flege, Yeni-Komshian, and Liu's (1999) study of L2 learners using rule-related predictors and found that, in addition to the overall drop in performance due to a sensitive period, L2 knowledge increased with years of input. Knowledge of different grammar rules was negatively associated with input frequency of those rules. To better understand these effects, we modeled the results using a connectionist model that was trained using Korean as a first language (L1) and then English as an L2. To explain the sensitive period in L2 learning, the model's learning rate was reduced in an age-related manner. By assigning different learning rates for syntax and lexical learning, we were able to model the difference between early and late L2 learners in input sensitivity. The model's learning mechanism allowed transfer between the L1 and L2, and this helped to explain the differences between different rules in the grammaticality judgment task. This work demonstrates that an L1 model of learning and processing can be adapted to provide an explicit account of how the input and the sensitive period interact in L2 learning.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Cognitive Science - A Multidisciplinary Journal published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age of acquisition; Connectionist neural network; Input-based learning; Language acquisition; Second language learning; Sensitive period

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744901      PMCID: PMC6001481          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  42 in total

1.  Nominal versus verbal morpheme use in late talkers at ages 3 and 4.

Authors:  Leslie Rescorla; Julie Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation.

Authors:  Padraic Monaghan; Nick Chater; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-24

Review 3.  Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

5.  The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

6.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Karsten Steinhauer; Erdmut Pfeifer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Acoustical cues and grammatical units in speech to two preverbal infants.

Authors:  Melanie Soderstrom; Megan Blossom; Rina Foygel; James L Morgan
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition.

Authors:  Ben Ambridge; Evan Kidd; Caroline F Rowland; Anna L Theakston
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2015-03

10.  Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models.

Authors:  Paul Cd Johnson
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 7.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.