Literature DB >> 15925574

The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation.

Padraic Monaghan1, Nick Chater, Morten H Christiansen.   

Abstract

Recognising the grammatical categories of words is a necessary skill for the acquisition of syntax and for on-line sentence processing. The syntactic and semantic context of the word contribute as cues for grammatical category assignment, but phonological cues, too, have been implicated as important sources of information. The value of phonological and distributional cues has not, with very few exceptions, been empirically assessed. This paper presents a series of analyses of phonological cues and distributional cues and their potential for distinguishing grammatical categories of words in corpus analyses. The corpus analyses indicated that phonological cues were more reliable for less frequent words, whereas distributional information was most valuable for high frequency words. We tested this prediction in an artificial language learning experiment, where the distributional and phonological cues of categories of nonsense words were varied. The results corroborated the corpus analyses. For high-frequency nonwords, distributional information was more useful, whereas for low-frequency words there was more reliance on phonological cues. The results indicate that phonological and distributional cues contribute differentially towards grammatical categorisation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15925574     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  36 in total

1.  Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Jocelyn R Folk; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Ruskin H Hunt; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Morten H Christiansen; Padraic Monaghan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Probabilistically-Cued Patterns Trump Perfect Cues in Statistical Language Learning.

Authors:  Jill Lany; Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.

Authors:  Kathryn D Schuler; Patricia A Reeder; Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Interactions between statistical and semantic information in infant language development.

Authors:  Jill Lany; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-09

8.  Psych verbs, the linking problem, and the acquisition of language.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Timothy J O'Donnell; Yasutada Sudo; Miki Uruwashi; Miseon Lee; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-29

9.  What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

10.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.