Literature DB >> 28744514

Does sitting versus standing radiographic assessment of odontoid fractures matter? A case report.

Ilyas S Aleem1, Yazeed Gussous2, Michael King, Jeremy Fogelson, Ahmad Nassr, Bradford L Currier.   

Abstract

Fractures of the odontoid are the most common cervical spine injury in the geriatric population. The relationship between odontoid fracture displacement and postural change has not been previously described. We present the first described case of an elderly female patient with thoracic kyphosis and a type II odontoid fracture demonstrating significant fracture displacement with a postural change from sitting to standing. Various radiographic parameters are assessed and discussed in an attempt to characterize and explain this finding. We highlight the importance of regional and global spinal alignment and quantify physiologic odontoid fracture behavior with postural changes in this growing demographic. Upright radiographs in both sitting and standing positions may be considered when concern for odontoid fracture stability is questioned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2 fracture; Odontoid fracture; cervical fracture; odontoid displacement; postural change; spinal alignment; spinal parameters

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744514      PMCID: PMC5506295          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.05.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  9 in total

Review 1.  Odontoid fractures: update on management.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting: a radiologic investigation including reliability and repeatability of the lumbar lordosis measure.

Authors:  Diana E De Carvalho; David Soave; Kim Ross; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Spino-pelvic postural changes between the standing and sitting human position: proposal of a method for its systematic analysis.

Authors:  E Berthonnaud; R Hilmi; H Labelle; J Dimnet
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Sitting sagittal balance is different from standing balance in children with scoliosis.

Authors:  Joshua J Vaughn; Richard M Schwend
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Evidence of a pelvis-driven flexion pattern: are the joints of the lower lumbar spine fully flexed in seated postures?

Authors:  Nadine M Dunk; Angela E Kedgley; Thomas R Jenkyn; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Variations of cervical lordosis and head alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery for sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  R Cecchinato; F Langella; R Bassani; V Sansone; C Lamartina; P Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery.

Authors:  Yoon Ha; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Gregory Mundis; Christopher Shaffrey; Justin Smith; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Predictors of treatment outcomes in geriatric patients with odontoid fractures: AOSpine North America multi-centre prospective GOF study.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Ranganathan Arun; Alexander R Vaccaro; Paul M Arnold; Jens R Chapman; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.