Literature DB >> 23965915

Sitting sagittal balance is different from standing balance in children with scoliosis.

Joshua J Vaughn1, Richard M Schwend.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several variables can have effect on sagittal balance. The changes that occur between standing and sitting have been inadequately studied, especially in the, pediatric population.
METHODS: Preoperative sagittal radiographs were obtained in both standing and sitting positions for 26 patients with idiopathic scoliosis before spinal fusion and instrumentation. Standard measurements of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and lumbar intervertebral angles were, recorded. Differences were compared between positions using 2-sided paired t tests.
RESULTS: When moving from standing to a seated position, the spine loses 5-degree thoracic kyphosis (P=0.007), 29-degree lumbar lordosis (P<0.0001), and the sacrum rotates 20 degrees (P<0.0001) to a more vertical position. The greatest change in sitting sagittal balance occurs due to increased pelvic tilt with decreased SS. The next greatest change is increased forward flexion of the lowest 2 lumbar vertebrae, 6.5 degrees between L4-L5 (P<0.0001) and 5.9 degrees between L5-S1 (P<0.0001). Flexion occurs throughout the lumbar spine but its magnitude decreases in the more proximal lumbar segments, 1.6 degrees between L1-L2 (P=0.028). The sagittal vertical axis also moves more anterior by 44 mm (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sitting significantly straightens the spine with decreases of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and SS. The majority of the changes occur in the lumbar spine and pelvis. As humans spend much of their time sitting, this difference should be considered when spinal instrumentation is performed. These findings may be important to those who only sit, especially when instrumentation is extended to the pelvis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II--retrospective prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23965915     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

1.  The standing and sitting sagittal spinopelvic alignment of Chinese young and elderly population: does age influence the differences between the two positions?

Authors:  Siyu Zhou; Zhuoran Sun; Wei Li; Wei Wang; Tong Su; Chengbo Du; Weishi Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does sitting versus standing radiographic assessment of odontoid fractures matter? A case report.

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Yazeed Gussous; Michael King; Jeremy Fogelson; Ahmad Nassr; Bradford L Currier
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

3.  Do the three-dimensional parameters of brace-wearing patients with AIS change when transitioning from standing to sitting position? A preliminary study on Lenke I.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Daoyang Yang; Shuo Zhang; Jun Wang; Yuan Chen; Xiaoran Dou; Yanan Liu; Xianglan Li; Bagen Liao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Iliac screw instrumentation to the pelvis in children with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis. No lateral connectors and respect sagittal balance.

Authors:  Zhenkai Wu; Richard M Schwend; John T Anderson; Joanne Abby M Marasigan; Nigel J Price
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Alignment in Middle-Aged and Older Men and Women in the Natural and Erect Sitting Positions: A Prospective Study in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Siyu Zhou; Wei Li; Wei Wang; Da Zou; Zhuoran Sun; Fei Xu; Chengbo Du; Weishi Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-25

Review 6.  The sitting vs standing spine.

Authors:  Christos Tsagkaris; Jonas Widmer; Florian Wanivenhaus; Andrea Redaelli; Claudio Lamartina; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  The radiographic assessments of spino-pelvic compensation using IoT-based real-time ischial pressure adjustment.

Authors:  Moon-Jun Sohn; Haenghwa Lee; Byung-Jou Lee; Hae-Won Koo; Kwang Hyeon Kim; Sang-Won Yoon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.