Literature DB >> 28744058

The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.

Kyoung-Sim Jung1, Jin-Hwa Jung1, Sang-Hun Jang2, Hyun-Soo Bang2, Tae-Sung In2.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) translated into Korean for use with patients' low back pain.
[Subjects and Methods] Sixty-two subjects with low back pain, 28 men and 34 women, participated in the study. Reliability was determined by using the intra class correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating the JOABPEQ scores with the 36 item short form health survey (SF 36).
[Results] Test-retest reliability was 0.75-0.83. The criterion-related validity was established by comparison with the Korean version of the SF 36.
[Conclusion] The Korean version of the JOABPEQ was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing low back pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ); Reliability; Validity

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744058      PMCID: PMC5509602          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder that more than 80% of the global population experiences at least once during their lifetime1, 2). In addition, low back pain is more frequently observed in the age group from the 40s to 80s, and especially in females3). To restore normal function, patients with low back pain receive physical therapy4). Therefore, for effective treatment, a measurement tool to evaluate functions and monitor changes is needed5, 6). Outcome measurement is important in decision making and evaluating the results, and is advantageous in continuous management of the patients7). In order to accurately evaluate low back pain, outcome measurement should include topics regarding pain, low back function, general health condition, work disability, and patient satisfaction8). While there are many scales that evaluate low back pain, there is no gold standard questionnaire on low back pain9). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was developed from the original Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and is a disease specific outcome measure that the patients with low back pain can self-report10). Most components are related to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICFDH)11). The JOABPEQ has been translated into various languages, such as Iranian12), Thai13), and Turkish9), and has been determined to be highly reliable and valid. However, the reliability and validity of the Korean translation of the JOABPEQ have not yet been confirmed. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the JOABPEQ.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects were 62 outpatients with low back disorder receiving physical therapy at C Orthopedic Clinic in Gyeonggii-do. The inclusion criterion was that the patients be diagnosed with lumbar spine disease. The exclusion criteria were the inability to read Korean or respond to the questionnaire, infection at the lumbar spine, tumor at lumbar vertebra or intradural tumor, traumatic lumbar instability, rheumatoid arthritis, recent surgery lumbar spine, or congenital spinal disorder. After the subjects were informed about the study, they agreed to participate and signed consent forms. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gachon University. The JOABPEQ is a self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate low back disorder, dysfunction, and disabilities resulting from low back complaints. The questionnaire consists of 25 items in 5 subscales: low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, mental health, and social function. The scores range from 0 to 100 and a low score indicates worse health status10). The forward- and back-translations of the JOABPEQ presented no major language problems for an expert committee including professors and language experts14). To evaluate reliability, the test-retest method was used. The patients completed a Korean version of the JOABPEQ at first visit and again 2 weeks later. All tests were again collected by the same physiotherapist. The 14-day test-retest reliability was analyzed according to the intra class correlation coefficient (2,1) as well as internal consistency with Cronbach’s α. Criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating the 8 subscales of the Korean SF 36; General Health (GH), Physical Function (PF), Social Function (SF), Mental health (MH), Role Physical (RP), Role Emotional (RE), Bodily Pain (BP), and Vitality (VT).

RESULTS

The general characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

The demographic characteristics of study participants (n=62)

Mean ± SD
Characteristic
Gender, male/female62 (28/34)
Age (years)42.5 ± 16.6
Height (cm)162.1 ± 15.4
Weight (kg)63.6 ± 15.4
Pain duration (months)20.1 ± 10.2
The type of low back pain
Lumbar disc herniation42
Lumbar canal stenosis7
Spondylolisthesis2
Scoliosis3
Non-specific low back pain8
The ICC score was found to be 0.76, 0.83, 0.75, 0.80, and 0.79 for “low back pain,” “lumbar function,” “walking ability,” “social life function.” and “mental health” subscales respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.

Test-retest reliability for JOABPEQ

Internal consistency (α)ICC (95% CI)
Low back pain0.70.76 (0.65–0.89)
Lumbar function0.680.83 (0.72–0.93)
Walking ability0.740.75 (0.61–0.87)
Social life function0.720.80 (0.73–0.92)
Mental health0.780.79 (0.67–0.90)

JOABPEQ: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient.

JOABPEQ: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient. The JOABPEQ parameter values showed significant correlations in all 8 subscales of the Korean version of the SF 36 (Table 3). Low back pain showed strong correlation with the RP, RE, and BP subscales. Lumbar function showed strong correlation with the PF subscale. Walking ability showed moderate correlation with the SF 36 subscales, except for VT. Social life function showed strong correlation with the PF subscale. Mental health showed strong correlation with the GH, MH, and RE subscales.
Table 3.

Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the JOABPEQ with the SF-36

JOABPEQGHPFSFMHRPREBPVT
Low back pain0.420.400.470.270.540.630.620.48
Lumbar function0.330.540.420.250.400.460.410.31
Walking ability0.410.490.440.320.440.440.370.25
Social life function0.300.510.370.210.470.430.400.40
Mental health0.510.440.460.600.400.600.350.50

All correlations are significant at the 0.05 level. JOABPEQ: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; SF-36: 36-item short form health survey; GH: general health; PF: physical function; SF: social function; MH: mental health; RP: role physical; RE: role emotional; BP: bodily pain; VT: vitality

All correlations are significant at the 0.05 level. JOABPEQ: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; SF-36: 36-item short form health survey; GH: general health; PF: physical function; SF: social function; MH: mental health; RP: role physical; RE: role emotional; BP: bodily pain; VT: vitality

DISCUSSION

In this study, the test-retest reliability of the Korean version of the JOABPEQ was determined to be high. The reliability of the Thai version was tested with a two-week interval because the symptoms did not show dramatic changes and difficulty in remembering the contents of the questionnaire13). The subscales of low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health all showed ICC >0.7, revealing high reliability. In this study, the reliability was also tested with a two-week interval, and all subscales showed high reliability with ICC >0.7. In the Iranian version, internal consistency of the subscales was analyzed. Cronbach’s α coefficient was acceptable, with the results ranging from 0.71–0.8112). In the Thai version, internal consistency of the subscales, excluding lumbar function, revealed to be acceptable with the score greater than 0.7. For all the questions, internal consistency was very high, with a score of 0.86613). In this study, the result of the internal consistency of the subscales was also acceptable like the Iranian and Thai versions. Cronbach’s α coefficient was lower than 0.95, confirming no item redundancy15). In the Thai version, correlations in the 8 subscales of the SF 36 were analyzed to confirm the validity of the JOABPEQ. All subscales of the JOABPEQ showed significant positive correlation, which was explained as a result of the original JOABPEQ having been developed from the Rolland Morris Disability questionnaire and SF 3613). Further, in the Turkish version, correlations with social function, mental health, bodily pain, and physical function from the subscales of the SF 36 were measured, confirming good to very good correlation. Excellent correlation was identified with the Oswestry Disability Index9). In this study, similar to the Thai version, correlations in the 8 subscales of the SF 36 were analyzed to evaluate the validity of the JOABPEQ. The results were similar to the Thai version with r=0.21–0.63, showing significant positive correlation in all subscales. In the Iranian version, responsiveness was analyzed to observe whether or not the JOABPEQ detects change before and after the intervention. In all the subscales, improvement was observed12). The Thai version reported no floor and ceiling effect13). In this study, a similar result to the aforementioned study was observed regarding the floor and ceiling effect, signifying that it consists of appropriate ranges to detect change16). Cross-cultural adaptations of existing language questionnaires, by translating them into specific languages for each country, would enable comparisons of different populations and permit the exchange of information between the countries17). Therefore, it is important that translations of the questionnaires adapted for the specific culture in order to deliver the same meaning. The JOABPEQ was translated into Korean to verify the reliability and validity. However, due to the small sample size, it is difficult to generalize the results. Further, responsiveness that detects change over time was not evaluated. In the future, a broader spectrum of patients with lower back disorder should be included to determine reliability; furthermore, correlation analysis with functional disability measurement tool related to various low back disorders other than quality of life are needed.
  17 in total

1.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D F Fardon; P C Milette
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pu Wang; Junmei Zhang; Weijing Liao; Lei Zhao; Yi Guo; Zhuoying Qiu; Guanghui Yue
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paulo Henrique Ferreira; Giovanni Campos Pozzi; Rodrigo Nogueira Ribeiro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.

Authors:  Thanate Poosiripinyo; Permsak Paholpak; Kitti Jirarattanaphochai; Weerachai Kosuwon; Winai Sirichativapee; Taweechok Wisanuyotin; Pat Laupattarakasem; Kamolsak Sukhonthamarn; Polasak Jeeravipoolvarn; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

Authors:  Megan Davidson; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-01

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Gurkan Gunaydin; Zeynep Hazar Kanik; Gul Oznur Karabicak; Ugur Sozlu; Omer Osman Pala; Zeynep Beyza Alkan; Selda Basar; Seyit Citaker
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  C Philip Gabel; Lori A Michener; Brendan Burkett; Anne Neller
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuo Yonenobu; Eiji Wada; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Combined Traditional Acupuncture, Pharmacopuncture and Applied Kinesiology on Lumbar Diseases of Resident Patients.

Authors:  Sang-Ju Lee; Chang Beohm Ahn
Journal:  J Pharmacopuncture       Date:  2019-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.