Literature DB >> 22409275

Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review.

Pu Wang1, Junmei Zhang, Weijing Liao, Lei Zhao, Yi Guo, Zhuoying Qiu, Guanghui Yue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify questionnaires and scales that measure functioning and disability in low-back pain (LBP) and determine whether the measurements are comparable with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICFDH).
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBase, CINAHL and PEDro in English, and CNKI and Wanfang Data in Chinese in a period from the date of the database establishment to September 2010. From the identified literature, questionnaires and scales used to assess LBP-related functioning and disability were collected and classified. Each item in each questionnaire and scale was extracted and classified according to the ICFDH categories.
RESULTS: We have reviewed 7968 published articles and identified a total of fifteen questionnaires. A total of 219 items were analyzed and a total of 354 concepts contained in these items and 345 could be linked to ICFDH components, 138 linked to body function, 20 to body structure, 174 to activities and participation, and 13 to environmental factors, and 9 to a non-classifiable cluster. In the body functions component, only the single category "sensation of pain" was covered by most questionnaires. In the activity and participation component, "changing basic body position"; "walking" and "maintaining a body position" were covered by most questionnaires. Analyzing individual questionnaires, we found that two questionnaires (Clinical Back Pain Questionnaire and Million Disability Questionnaire) demonstrate a well-balanced distribution of items across different ICFDH components.
CONCLUSION: This study may help researchers and clinicians to choose the most appropriate questionnaires for a specific purpose as well as help compare studies that have used different questionnaires for low back pain assessment and provide valuable information on the content quality of these questionnaires for them. Furthermore, based on our results, more comprehensive and balanced instruments may be developed for more accurate assessment of functioning in LBP and perhaps other clinical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22409275     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.637602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  5 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS ® pain interference item bank.

Authors:  Erik Farin; Michaela Nagl; Lukas Gramm; Katja Heyduck; Manuela Glattacker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.

Authors:  Kyoung-Sim Jung; Jin-Hwa Jung; Sang-Hun Jang; Hyun-Soo Bang; Tae-Sung In
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-07-15

3.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Back Pain Functional Scale.

Authors:  Gokhan Maras; Shahed Sheidayi; Gokhan Yazici; Melek Volkan Yazici; Gurkan Gunaydin; Seyit Citaker
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-03-15

4.  Using existing questionnaires in latent class analysis: should we use summary scores or single items as input? A methodological study using a cohort of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Anne Molgaard Nielsen; Werner Vach; Peter Kent; Lise Hestbaek; Alice Kongsted
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  What are important consequences in children with non-specific spinal pain? A qualitative study of Danish children aged 9-12 years.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Anna Bjellekjær Stolpe; Cornelius Myburgh; Lise Hestbæk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.