Literature DB >> 28738126

Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau-Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers.

Richard Rubenstein1, Binggong Chang1, John K Yue2, Allen Chiu1, Ethan A Winkler2,3, Ava M Puccio4, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia5, Esther L Yuh2,6, Pratik Mukherjee2,6, Alex B Valadka7, Wayne A Gordon8, David O Okonkwo4, Peter Davies9, Sanjeev Agarwal10, Fan Lin11, George Sarkis11,12, Hamad Yadikar11,13, Zhihui Yang11, Geoffrey T Manley2,3, Kevin K W Wang11, Shelly R Cooper14, Kristen Dams-O'Connor8, Allison J Borrasso4, Tomoo Inoue2,3, Andrew I R Maas15, David K Menon16, David M Schnyer17, Mary J Vassar2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Annually in the United States, at least 3.5 million people seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The development of therapies for TBI is limited by the absence of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Microtubule-associated protein tau is an axonal phosphoprotein. To date, the presence of the hypophosphorylated tau protein (P-tau) in plasma from patients with acute TBI and chronic TBI has not been investigated. Objective: To examine the associations between plasma P-tau and total-tau (T-tau) levels and injury presence, severity, type of pathoanatomic lesion (neuroimaging), and patient outcomes in acute and chronic TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the TRACK-TBI Pilot study, plasma was collected at a single time point from 196 patients with acute TBI admitted to 3 level I trauma centers (<24 hours after injury) and 21 patients with TBI admitted to inpatient rehabilitation units (mean [SD], 176.4 [44.5] days after injury). Control samples were purchased from a commercial vendor. The TRACK-TBI Pilot study was conducted from April 1, 2010, to June 30, 2012. Data analysis for the current investigation was performed from August 1, 2015, to March 13, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Plasma samples were assayed for P-tau (using an antibody that specifically recognizes phosphothreonine-231) and T-tau using ultra-high sensitivity laser-based immunoassay multi-arrayed fiberoptics conjugated with rolling circle amplification.
Results: In the 217 patients with TBI, 161 (74.2%) were men; mean (SD) age was 42.5 (18.1) years. The P-tau and T-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio in patients with acute TBI were higher than those in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the 3 tau indices demonstrated accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000, 0.916, and 1.000, respectively, for discriminating mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, 13-15, n = 162) from healthy controls. The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio were higher in individuals with more severe TBI (GCS, ≤12 vs 13-15). The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed the T-tau level in distinguishing cranial computed tomography-positive from -negative cases (AUC = 0.921, 0.923, and 0.646, respectively). Acute P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio weakly distinguished patients with TBI who had good outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended GOS-E, 7-8) (AUC = 0.663 and 0.658, respectively) and identified those with poor outcomes (GOS-E, ≤4 vs >4) (AUC = 0.771 and 0.777, respectively). Plasma samples from patients with chronic TBI also showed elevated P-tau levels and a P-tau-T-tau ratio significantly higher than that of healthy controls, with both P-tau indices strongly discriminating patients with chronic TBI from healthy controls (AUC = 1.000 and 0.963, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Plasma P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed T-tau level as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for acute TBI. Compared with T-tau levels alone, P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratios show more robust and sustained elevations among patients with chronic TBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28738126      PMCID: PMC5710183          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  46 in total

1.  Medical aspects of boxing, particularly from a neurological standpoint.

Authors:  M CRITCHLEY
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1957-02-16

2.  Alzheimer CSF biomarkers in routine clinical setting.

Authors:  F Tabaraud; J P Leman; A M Milor; J M Roussie; G Barrière; M Tartary; F Boutros-Toni; M Rigaud
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarker in cognitively normal subjects.

Authors:  Jon B Toledo; Henrik Zetterberg; Argonde C van Harten; Lidia Glodzik; Pablo Martinez-Lage; Luisella Bocchio-Chiavetto; Lorena Rami; Oskar Hansson; Reisa Sperling; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Ricardo S Osorio; Hugo Vanderstichele; Manu Vandijck; Harald Hampel; Stefan Teipl; Abhay Moghekar; Marilyn Albert; William T Hu; Jose A Monge Argilés; Ana Gorostidi; Charlotte E Teunissen; Peter P De Deyn; Bradley T Hyman; Jose L Molinuevo; Giovanni B Frisoni; Gurutz Linazasoro; Mony J de Leon; Wiesje M van der Flier; Philip Scheltens; Kaj Blennow; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model.

Authors:  Lee E Goldstein; Andrew M Fisher; Chad A Tagge; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Libor Velisek; John A Sullivan; Chirag Upreti; Jonathan M Kracht; Maria Ericsson; Mark W Wojnarowicz; Cezar J Goletiani; Giorgi M Maglakelidze; Noel Casey; Juliet A Moncaster; Olga Minaeva; Robert D Moir; Christopher J Nowinski; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu; James Geiling; Jan K Blusztajn; Benjamin L Wolozin; Tsuneya Ikezu; Thor D Stein; Andrew E Budson; Neil W Kowall; David Chargin; Andre Sharon; Sudad Saman; Garth F Hall; William C Moss; Robin O Cleveland; Rudolph E Tanzi; Patric K Stanton; Ann C McKee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Accumulation of amyloid beta and tau and the formation of neurofilament inclusions following diffuse brain injury in the pig.

Authors:  D H Smith; X H Chen; M Nonaka; J Q Trojanowski; V M Lee; K E Saatman; M J Leoni; B N Xu; J A Wolf; D F Meaney
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  Predicting health-related quality of life 2 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  M V Forslund; C Roe; S Sigurdardottir; N Andelic
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  Should the neurointensive care management of traumatic brain injury patients be individualized according to autoregulation status and injury subtype?

Authors:  Ulf Johnson; Anders Lewén; Elisabeth Ronne-Engström; Tim Howells; Per Enblad
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John K Yue; Mary J Vassar; Hester F Lingsma; Shelly R Cooper; David O Okonkwo; Alex B Valadka; Wayne A Gordon; Andrew I R Maas; Pratik Mukherjee; Esther L Yuh; Ava M Puccio; David M Schnyer; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Advances in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: focusing on tau-mediated neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Yale Duan; Suzhen Dong; Feng Gu; Yinghe Hu; Zheng Zhao
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 8.014

Review 10.  Tau imaging in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  M Dani; D J Brooks; P Edison
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  65 in total

1.  Plasma Tau and Amyloid Are Not Reliably Related to Injury Characteristics, Neuropsychological Performance, or White Matter Integrity in Service Members with a History of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sara M Lippa; Ping-Hong Yeh; Jessica Gill; Louis M French; Tracey A Brickell; Rael T Lange
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Correlation of Blood Biomarkers and Biomarker Panels with Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jussi P Posti; Riikka S K Takala; Linnéa Lagerstedt; Alex M Dickens; Iftakher Hossain; Mehrbod Mohammadian; Henna Ala-Seppälä; Janek Frantzén; Mark van Gils; Peter J Hutchinson; Ari J Katila; Henna-Riikka Maanpää; David K Menon; Virginia F Newcombe; Jussi Tallus; Kevin Hrusovsky; David H Wilson; Jessica Gill; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Olli Tenovuo; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: a short review.

Authors:  Marcela Usberti Gutierre; João Paulo Mota Telles; Leonardo Christiaan Welling; Nícollas Nunes Rabelo; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  The current state of biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Han Jun Kim; Jack W Tsao; Ansley Grimes Stanfill
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-01-11

Review 5.  Neurochemical biomarkers in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Ona Bloom; Ina-Beate Wanner; Armin Curt; Jan M Schwab; James Fawcett; Kevin K Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Neuroimaging of traumatic brain injury in military personnel: An overview.

Authors:  Avnish Bhattrai; Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 7.  Protein biomarkers of epileptogenicity after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston; Alaa Kamnaksh
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  Proteomic Profiling of Mouse Brains Exposed to Blast-Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Reveals Changes in Axonal Proteins and Phosphorylated Tau.

Authors:  Mei Chen; Hailong Song; Jiankun Cui; Catherine E Johnson; Graham K Hubler; Ralph G DePalma; Zezong Gu; Weiming Xia
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 9.  Targeting NRF2 to suppress ferroptosis in brain injury.

Authors:  Shunchen Song; Yaxuan Gao; Yi Sheng; Tongyu Rui; Chengliang Luo
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Age-Related Differences in Diagnostic Accuracy of Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Tau for Identifying Acute Intracranial Trauma on Computed Tomography: A TRACK-TBI Study.

Authors:  Raquel C Gardner; Richard Rubenstein; Kevin K W Wang; Frederick K Korley; John K Yue; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherje; Alex B Valadka; David O Okonkwo; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.