Literature DB >> 28736467

Stability of Gradient Field Corrections for Quantitative Diffusion MRI.

Baxter P Rogers1, Justin Blaber2, E Brian Welch1, Zhaohua Ding1, Adam W Anderson1, Bennett A Landman2.   

Abstract

In magnetic resonance diffusion imaging, gradient nonlinearity causes significant bias in the estimation of quantitative diffusion parameters such as diffusivity, anisotropy, and diffusion direction in areas away from the magnet isocenter. This bias can be substantially reduced if the scanner- and coil-specific gradient field nonlinearities are known. Using a set of field map calibration scans on a large (29 cm diameter) phantom combined with a solid harmonic approximation of the gradient fields, we predicted the obtained b-values and applied gradient directions throughout a typical field of view for brain imaging for a typical 32-direction diffusion imaging sequence. We measured the stability of these predictions over time. At 80 mm from scanner isocenter, predicted b-value was 1-6% different than intended due to gradient nonlinearity, and predicted gradient directions were in error by up to 1 degree. Over the course of one month the change in these quantities due to calibration-related factors such as scanner drift and variation in phantom placement was <0.5% for b-values, and <0.5 degrees for angular deviation. The proposed calibration procedure allows the estimation of gradient nonlinearity to correct b-values and gradient directions ahead of advanced diffusion image processing for high angular resolution data, and requires only a five-minute phantom scan that can be included in a weekly or monthly quality assurance protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; b-values; gradient field nonlinearity; quantitative diffusion imaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 28736467      PMCID: PMC5521266          DOI: 10.1117/12.2254609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  10 in total

1.  Analysis and generalized correction of the effect of spatial gradient field distortions in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  R Bammer; M Markl; A Barnett; B Acar; M T Alley; N J Pelc; G H Glover; M E Moseley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Practical estimate of gradient nonlinearity for implementation of apparent diffusion coefficient bias correction.

Authors:  Dariya I Malkyarenko; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A method for calibrating diffusion gradients in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The b matrix in diffusion tensor echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  J Mattiello; P J Basser; D Le Bihan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Improved correction for gradient nonlinearity effects in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Zachary W Slavens; Kevin F King; Christopher J Hardy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Gradient nonlinearity correction to improve apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy and standardization in the american college of radiology imaging network 6698 breast cancer trial.

Authors:  David C Newitt; Ek T Tan; Lisa J Wilmes; Thomas L Chenevert; John Kornak; Luca Marinelli; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; David Newitt; Lisa J Wilmes; Alina Tudorica; Karl G Helmer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Michael A Jacobs; Guido Jajamovich; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; Wei Huang; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Saad Jbabdi; Junqian Xu; Jesper L Andersson; Steen Moeller; Edward J Auerbach; Matthew F Glasser; Moises Hernandez; Guillermo Sapiro; Mark Jenkinson; David A Feinberg; Essa Yacoub; Christophe Lenglet; David C Van Essen; Kamil Ugurbil; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; J Anthony Wilson; Timothy S Coalson; Bruce Fischl; Jesper L Andersson; Junqian Xu; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew Webster; Jonathan R Polimeni; David C Van Essen; Mark Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Phantom-based field maps for gradient nonlinearity correction in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Justin Blaber; Allen T Newton; Colin B Hansen; E Brian Welch; Adam W Anderson; Jeffrey J Luci; Carlo Pierpaoli; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03

2.  Measuring non-parametric distributions of intravoxel mean diffusivities using a clinical MRI scanner.

Authors:  Alexandru V Avram; Joelle E Sarlls; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Empirical field mapping for gradient nonlinearity correction of multi-site diffusion weighted MRI.

Authors:  Colin B Hansen; Baxter P Rogers; Kurt G Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A Blaber; Okan Irfanoglu; Alan Barnett; Carlo Pierpaoli; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  The effect of gradient nonlinearities on fiber orientation estimates from spherical deconvolution of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Fenghua Guo; Alberto de Luca; Greg Parker; Derek K Jones; Max A Viergever; Alexander Leemans; Chantal M W Tax
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.