Literature DB >> 25758543

Gradient nonlinearity correction to improve apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy and standardization in the american college of radiology imaging network 6698 breast cancer trial.

David C Newitt1, Ek T Tan2, Lisa J Wilmes1, Thomas L Chenevert3, John Kornak4, Luca Marinelli2, Nola Hylton1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a gradient nonlinearity correction (GNC) program for quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements on phantom and human subject diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in a multicenter breast cancer treatment response study
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A GNC program using fifth-order spherical harmonics for gradient modeling was applied retrospectively to qualification phantom and human subject scans. Ice-water phantoms of known diffusion coefficient were scanned at five different study centers with different scanners and receiver coils. Human in vivo data consisted of baseline and early-treatment exams on 54 patients from four sites. ADC maps were generated with and without GNC. Regions of interest were defined to quantify absolute errors and changes with GNC over breast imaging positions.
RESULTS: Phantom ADC errors varied with region of interest (ROI) position and scanner configuration; the mean error by configuration ranged from 1.4% to 19.9%. GNC significantly reduced the overall mean error for all sites from 9.9% to 0.6% (P = 0.016). Spatial dependence of GNC was highest in the right-left (RL) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. Human subject mean tumor ADC was reduced 0.2 to 12% by GNC at different sites. By regression, every 1-cm change in tumor ROI position between baseline and follow-up visits resulted in an estimated change of 2.4% in the ADC early-treatment response measurement.
CONCLUSION: GNC is effective for removing large, system-dependent errors in quantitative breast DWI. GNC may be important in ensuring reproducibility in multicenter studies and in reducing errors in longitudinal treatment response measures arising from spatial variations in tumor position between visits.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC; breast cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging; gradient nonlinearity; multicenter studies; quantitative imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758543      PMCID: PMC4629811          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  17 in total

1.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin D Pickles; Peter Gibbs; Martin Lowry; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Revathi S Murthy; Ali Ziadloo; Steven W White; Kimberly H Allison; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Improved correction for gradient nonlinearity effects in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Zachary W Slavens; Kevin F King; Christopher J Hardy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The effect of concomitant gradient fields on diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  C A Baron; R M Lebel; A H Wilman; C Beaulieu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature-controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies.

Authors:  Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Marko K Ivancevic; Susan E Rohrer; Frank J Londy; Thomas C Kwee; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics.

Authors:  S C Partridge; H Rahbar; R Murthy; X Chai; B F Kurland; W B DeMartini; C D Lehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.

Authors:  Edward F Jackson; Daniel P Barboriak; Luc M Bidaut; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  A Fangberget; L B Nilsen; K H Hole; M M Holmen; O Engebraaten; B Naume; H-J Smith; D R Olsen; T Seierstad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  24 in total

1.  Phantom-based field maps for gradient nonlinearity correction in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Justin Blaber; Allen T Newton; Colin B Hansen; E Brian Welch; Adam W Anderson; Jeffrey J Luci; Carlo Pierpaoli; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03

2.  Stability of Gradient Field Corrections for Quantitative Diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Justin Blaber; E Brian Welch; Zhaohua Ding; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.

Authors:  Vivian Youngjean Park; Sungheon G Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Hee Jung Shin; Madeline Dang; Habib Rahbar; Katja Pinker; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Design of a breast phantom for quantitative MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Lisa J Wilmes; Sheye O Aliu; David C Newitt; Ella F Jones; Michael A Boss; Karl F Stupic; Stephen E Russek; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.

Authors:  Ashley T Tao; Yunhong Shu; Ek T Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Shengzhen Tao; Robert D Reid; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Reduced acoustic noise in diffusion tensor imaging on a compact MRI system.

Authors:  Ek T Tan; Christopher J Hardy; Yunhong Shu; Myung-Ho In; Arnaud Guidon; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Thomas K F Foo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Adele P Peskin; Lisa J Wilmes; Sheye O Aliu; Ella F Jones; Wen Li; John Kornak; David C Newitt; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Retrospective Correction of ADC for Gradient Nonlinearity Errors in Multicenter Breast DWI Trials: ACRIN6698 Multiplatform Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; David C Newitt; Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Lisa J Wilmes; Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Ajit Devaraj; Johannes M Peeters; Shivraman Giri; Axel Vom Endt; Nola M Hylton; Savannah C Partridge; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.