Literature DB >> 25667948

Practical estimate of gradient nonlinearity for implementation of apparent diffusion coefficient bias correction.

Dariya I Malkyarenko1, Thomas L Chenevert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe an efficient procedure to empirically characterize gradient nonlinearity and correct for the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) bias on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spatial nonlinearity scalars for individual gradient coils along superior and right directions were estimated via diffusion measurements of an isotropicic e-water phantom. Digital nonlinearity model from an independent scanner, described in the literature, was rescaled by system-specific scalars to approximate 3D bias correction maps. Correction efficacy was assessed by comparison to unbiased ADC values measured at isocenter.
RESULTS: Empirically estimated nonlinearity scalars were confirmed by geometric distortion measurements of a regular grid phantom. The applied nonlinearity correction for arbitrarily oriented diffusion gradients reduced ADC bias from 20% down to 2% at clinically relevant offsets both for isotropic and anisotropic media. Identical performance was achieved using either corrected diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) intensities or corrected b-values for each direction in brain and ice-water. Direction-average trace image correction was adequate only for isotropic medium.
CONCLUSION: Empiric scalar adjustment of an independent gradient nonlinearity model adequately described DWI bias for a clinical scanner. Observed efficiency of implemented ADC bias correction quantitatively agreed with previous theoretical predictions and numerical simulations. The described procedure provides an independent benchmark for nonlinearity bias correction of clinical MRI scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25667948      PMCID: PMC4324556          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  19 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; J F Mangin; C Poupon; C A Clark; S Pappata; N Molko; H Chabriat
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Tumor response assessments with diffusion and perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Sonia P Li; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data.

Authors:  Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Douglas Greve; Elizabeth Haley; Andre van der Kouwe; Randy Gollub; David Kennedy; Franz Schmitt; Gregory Brown; James Macfall; Bruce Fischl; Anders Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients.

Authors:  S F Riches; K Hawtin; E M Charles-Edwards; N M de Souza
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Improved correction for gradient nonlinearity effects in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Zachary W Slavens; Kevin F King; Christopher J Hardy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature-controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies.

Authors:  Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Marko K Ivancevic; Susan E Rohrer; Frank J Londy; Thomas C Kwee; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Optimized isotropic diffusion weighting.

Authors:  E C Wong; R W Cox; A W Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Magnet field profiling: analysis and correcting coil design.

Authors:  F Roméo; D I Hoult
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors.

Authors:  T L Chenevert; L D Stegman; J M Taylor; P L Robertson; H S Greenberg; A Rehemtulla; B D Ross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  15 in total

1.  Phantom-based field maps for gradient nonlinearity correction in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Justin Blaber; Allen T Newton; Colin B Hansen; E Brian Welch; Adam W Anderson; Jeffrey J Luci; Carlo Pierpaoli; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03

2.  Stability of Gradient Field Corrections for Quantitative Diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Justin Blaber; E Brian Welch; Zhaohua Ding; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; David Newitt; Lisa J Wilmes; Alina Tudorica; Karl G Helmer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Michael A Jacobs; Guido Jajamovich; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; Wei Huang; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.

Authors:  Ashley T Tao; Yunhong Shu; Ek T Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Shengzhen Tao; Robert D Reid; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Empirical validation of gradient field models for an accurate ADC measured on clinical 3T MR systems in body oncologic applications.

Authors:  Yuxi Pang; Dariya I Malyarenko; Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Enzo Barberi; Michael Cole; Axel Vom Endt; Johannes Peeters; Ek T Tan; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kate Downey; Ayoma D Attygalle; Veronica A Morgan; Sharon L Giles; A MacDonald; M Davis; Thomas E J Ind; John H Shepherd; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  QIN DAWG Validation of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias Correction Workflow for Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Multicenter Trials.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Lisa J Wilmes; Lori R Arlinghaus; Michael A Jacobs; Wei Huang; Karl G Helmer; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; David Newitt; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

8.  Empirical field mapping for gradient nonlinearity correction of multi-site diffusion weighted MRI.

Authors:  Colin B Hansen; Baxter P Rogers; Kurt G Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A Blaber; Okan Irfanoglu; Alan Barnett; Carlo Pierpaoli; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.119

10.  Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias in Quantitative Diffusion Parameters of Renal Tissue with Intra Voxel Incoherent Motion.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Yuxi Pang; Julien Senegas; Marko K Ivancevic; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.