Thomas J Luben1, Jennifer L Nichols2, Steven J Dutton2, Ellen Kirrane2, Elizabeth O Owens3, Laura Datko-Williams4, Meagan Madden5, Jason D Sacks2. 1. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Electronic address: Luben.tom@epa.gov. 2. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 3. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; CROS NT, LLC., Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; Economics Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Black carbon (BC) is a ubiquitous component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from combustion-related sources and is associated with a number of health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the potential for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality following exposure to ambient BC, or the related component elemental carbon (EC), in the context of what is already known about the associations between exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and cardiovascular health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a stepwise systematic literature search of the PubMed database and employed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting our results. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies meeting inclusion criteria (i.e., include a quantitative measurement of BC or EC used to characterize exposure and an effect estimate of the association of the exposure metric with ED visits, hospital admissions, or mortality due to cardiovascular disease) were evaluated for risk of bias in study design and results. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Risk of bias evaluations assess some aspects of internal validity of study findings based on study design, conduct, and reporting and identify potential issues related to confounding or other biases. RESULTS: The results of our systematic review demonstrate similar results for BC or EC and PM2.5; that is, a generally modest, positive association of each pollutant measurement with cardiovascular emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality. There is no clear evidence that health risks are greater for either BC or EC when compared to one another, or when either is compared to PM2.5. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to adequately evaluate the role of copollutant confounding or differential spatial heterogeneity for BC or EC compared to PM2.5. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Overall, the evidence at present indicates that BC or EC is consistently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but is not sufficient to conclude that BC or EC is independently associated with these effects rather than being an indicator for PM2.5 mass. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not available. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Black carbon (BC) is a ubiquitous component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from combustion-related sources and is associated with a number of health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the potential for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality following exposure to ambient BC, or the related component elemental carbon (EC), in the context of what is already known about the associations between exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and cardiovascular health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a stepwise systematic literature search of the PubMed database and employed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting our results. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies meeting inclusion criteria (i.e., include a quantitative measurement of BC or EC used to characterize exposure and an effect estimate of the association of the exposure metric with ED visits, hospital admissions, or mortality due to cardiovascular disease) were evaluated for risk of bias in study design and results. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Risk of bias evaluations assess some aspects of internal validity of study findings based on study design, conduct, and reporting and identify potential issues related to confounding or other biases. RESULTS: The results of our systematic review demonstrate similar results for BC or EC and PM2.5; that is, a generally modest, positive association of each pollutant measurement with cardiovascular emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality. There is no clear evidence that health risks are greater for either BC or EC when compared to one another, or when either is compared to PM2.5. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to adequately evaluate the role of copollutant confounding or differential spatial heterogeneity for BC or EC compared to PM2.5. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Overall, the evidence at present indicates that BC or EC is consistently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but is not sufficient to conclude that BC or EC is independently associated with these effects rather than being an indicator for PM2.5 mass. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not available. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Air pollution; Black carbon; Cardiovascular; Morbidity; Mortality; Particulate matter
Authors: Jennifer L Nichols; Elizabeth Oesterling Owens; Steven J Dutton; Thomas J Luben Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2013-07-28 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Elizabeth Mostofsky; Joel Schwartz; Brent A Coull; Petros Koutrakis; Gregory A Wellenius; Helen H Suh; Diane R Gold; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu; Roger D Peng; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Roger D Peng; Michelle L Bell; Alison S Geyh; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kazuhiko Ito; Robert Mathes; Zev Ross; Arthur Nádas; George Thurston; Thomas Matte Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Nicole A H Janssen; Gerard Hoek; Milena Simic-Lawson; Paul Fischer; Leendert van Bree; Harry ten Brink; Menno Keuken; Richard W Atkinson; H Ross Anderson; Bert Brunekreef; Flemming R Cassee Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Andrea Winquist; James J Schauer; Jay R Turner; Jeremy A Sarnat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem; Weiye Wang; Onyemaechi Nwanaji-Enwerem; Pantel Vokonas; Andrea Baccarelli; Marc Weisskopf; Leon W Herndon; Janey L Wiggs; Sung Kyun Park; Joel Schwartz Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jessica R Deslauriers; Carrie A Redlich; Choong-Min Kang; Stephanie T Grady; Martin Slade; Petros Koutrakis; Eric Garshick Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 6.371
Authors: Pierre Masselot; Francesco Sera; Rochelle Schneider; Haidong Kan; Éric Lavigne; Massimo Stafoggia; Aurelio Tobias; Hong Chen; Richard T Burnett; Joel Schwartz; Antonella Zanobetti; Michelle L Bell; Bing-Yu Chen; Yue-Liang Leon Guo; Martina S Ragettli; Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera; Christofer Åström; Bertil Forsberg; Carmen Íñiguez; Rebecca M Garland; Noah Scovronick; Joana Madureira; Baltazar Nunes; César De la Cruz Valencia; Magali Hurtado Diaz; Yasushi Honda; Masahiro Hashizume; Chris Fook Cheng Ng; Evangelia Samoli; Klea Katsouyanni; Alexandra Schneider; Susanne Breitner; Niilo R I Ryti; Jouni J K Jaakkola; Marek Maasikmets; Hans Orru; Yuming Guo; Nicolás Valdés Ortega; Patricia Matus Correa; Shilu Tong; Antonio Gasparrini Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Kristina Shkirkova; Krista Lamorie-Foote; Michelle Connor; Arati Patel; Giuseppe Barisano; Hans Baertsch; Qinghai Liu; Todd E Morgan; Constantinos Sioutas; William J Mack Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Emma Busenkell; Christina M Collins; Marilyn L Moy; Jaime E Hart; Stephanie T Grady; Brent A Coull; Joel D Schwartz; Petros Koutrakis; Eric Garshick Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Masoumeh Rahmatinia; Mostafa Hadei; Philip K Hopke; Xavier Querol; Abbas Shahsavani; Zahra Namvar; Majid Kermani Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng Date: 2021-04-30
Authors: Max Gerrit Adam; Phuong Thi Minh Tran; David Kok Wai Cheong; Sitaraman Chandra Sekhar; Kwok Wai Tham; Rajasekhar Balasubramanian Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Borut Jereb; Brigita Gajšek; Gregor Šipek; Špela Kovše; Matevz Obrecht Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 3.390