Literature DB >> 28734710

Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice.

Enisa Shevroja1, Olivier Lamy2, Lynn Kohlmeier3, Fjorda Koromani4, Fernando Rivadeneira4, Didier Hans5.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common bone disease characterized by low bone mass and altered bone microarchitecture, resulting in decreased bone strength with an increased risk of fractures. In clinical practice, physicians can assess the risk of fracture for a patient based on several risk factors. Some such as age, weight, and history of fractures after 50 years of age, parental fracture, smoking status, and alcohol intake are incorporated into FRAX, an assessment tool that estimates the 10-year probability of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fractures based on the individual's risk factors profile. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is currently based on bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Among other widely recognized limitations of BMD is that BMD considers only the density of the bone and fails in measuring bone microarchitecture, for which novel techniques, such as trabecular bone score (TBS), have been developed. TBS is a texture parameter related to bone microarchitecture that may provide skeletal information that is not captured from the standard BMD measurement. Several studies have examined the value of TBS on predicting osteoporotic fractures. Our study aimed to summarize a review of the current scientific literature with focus on fracture risk assessment and to present both its findings and its conclusions regarding how and when TBS should be used. The existing literature indicates that low lumbar spine TBS is associated with a history of fracture and the incidence of new fracture. The effect is largely independent of BMD and of sufficient magnitude to enhance risk stratification with BMD. The TBS effect is also independent of FRAX, with likely greatest utility for those individuals whose BMD levels lie close to an intervention threshold. The clinical and scientific evidence supporting the use of TBS, with the ability of this technology to be seamlessly integrated into a daily workflow, makes TBS an attractive and useful clinical tool for physicians to improve patient management in osteoporosis. Further research is ongoing and necessary to further clarify the role of TBS in additional specific disorders.
Copyright © 2017 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; TBS; fracture risk assessment; osteoporosis; secondary osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734710     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  35 in total

1.  Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis consume high amounts of vegetables but insufficient dairy products and calcium to benefit from their virtues: the CoLaus/OsteoLaus cohort.

Authors:  A Lanyan; P Marques-Vidal; E Gonzalez-Rodriguez; D Hans; O Lamy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Early changes in bone turnover predict longer-term changes in bone mineral density but not trabecular bone score in frail older women.

Authors:  Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; Neil M Resnick; David A Nace; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 4.  X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine.

Authors:  M T Löffler; N Sollmann; K Mei; A Valentinitsch; P B Noël; J S Kirschke; T Baum
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

6.  Evaluation of bone texture imaging parameters on panoramic radiographs of patients with Sheehan's syndrome: a STROBE-compliant case-control study.

Authors:  D de Sá Cavalcante; M G da Silva Castro; A R P Quidute; M R A Martins; A M P L Cid; P G de Barros Silva; J Cadwell Williams; F S Neves; T R Ribeiro; F W G Costa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Trabecular Bone Score in Obese and Nonobese Subjects With Primary Hyperparathyroidism Before and After Parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Kwang Donovan Tay; Natalie E Cusano; Mishaela R Rubin; John Williams; Beatriz Omeragic; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Effect of compression fracture on trabecular bone score at lumbar spine.

Authors:  Y Hsu; T-J Hsieh; C-H Ho; C-H Lin; C K-H Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The reference value of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the Iranian population.

Authors:  Gita Shafiee; Farshad Sharifi; Ramin Heshmat; Afshin Ostovar; Mahbube Ebrahimpur; Ali Sheidaei; Iraj Nabipour; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-05-11

10.  Computed Tomography Osteodensitometry for Assessment of Bone Mineral Density of the Canine Head-Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Glynn Woods; Nicolas Israeliantz Gunz; Ian Handel; Tiziana Liuti; Richard J Mellanby; Tobias Schwarz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.